{"prompt":"AegisQuartzPlayerService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find AegisBirchMigratorStore's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for AegisCraneWorkspaceService, and the basic data flow in projects/aegis/ml/pipeline/features.py already works. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing Tokio deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisCraneWorkspaceService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisFlintTimelineCoordinator: ship, then document","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc now contains AegisSummitProxyService's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The AegisHarborIndexStore surface in projects/aegis/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split AegisDriftConsoleStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisGarnetModalCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: AegisCraneWorkspaceStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisCraneWorkspaceStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nThe cause and exact value change are already known, so keep this as a contained correction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, AegisOpalRouterStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de NATS JetStream. La causa ya está clara: cambia solo el timeout de staging de 15 a 30 segundos y ajusta su assertion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con NATS JetStream\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a AegisOpalRouterStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41124: retire the legacy replay path for AegisLumenChartFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible AegisLumenChartFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/aegis/config/staging.toml\n[worker.aegiscinderauthflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegiscinderauthflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegiscinderauthflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisCinderAuthFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41123\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/config/staging.toml and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: # projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.aegisflinttimelineflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisflinttimelineflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisflinttimelineflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisFlintTimelineFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41121\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Align AegisFlintTimelineFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Bring AegisIrisBatchStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale AegisRainfallDBService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisPrismCacheStore is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around AegisEmberRelayCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate AegisRainfallDBCoordinator's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisQuartzPlayerCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisFrostPanelCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn AegisFrostPanelService's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe AegisWillowCodecStore's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisMoonlitSDKCoordinator: sequence, then restructure","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisOrbitSyncCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: // projects/aegis/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class AegisMarbleTokenFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure AegisMarbleTokenFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: // projects/aegis/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nfinal class AegisDriftConsoleFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about AegisDriftConsoleFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisCoralUploadCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the AegisSpruceDaemonService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for AegisFlintTimelineStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For AegisEchoRegistryCoordinator, separate AegisEchoRegistryCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts, stay with PostgreSQL 17, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-41153\n\n08:02 deploy AegisCedarPolicyCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Turn the material above into a concise AegisCedarPolicyCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-41151: finish the compact AegisJuniperCLICoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nFramework: NATS JetStream\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete AegisJuniperCLICoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: projects/aegis/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte 里的 AegisMarbleTokenService 最近在 PostgreSQL 17 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请实现幂等 endpoint，包含持久 cursor、tenant 鉴权、spans 和 retry 测试。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 PostgreSQL 17\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 AegisMarbleTokenService","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current AegisNovaPickerStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisNovaPickerStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a AegisAmberFilterService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is AegisPrismCacheFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-41145: finish the compact AegisAcornWidgetFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nFramework: PostgreSQL 17\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Use the UI evidence to complete AegisAcornWidgetFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-41115\n\n08:02 deploy AegisSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible AegisSableParserFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisIrisBatchCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisVelaDrawerCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'AegisMicaProfileFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[AegisMicaProfileFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/aegis/infra/modules/edge/main.tf:144: error: -[AegisMicaProfileFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[AegisMicaProfileFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFind the source of this AegisMicaProfileFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'AegisEmberRelayFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[AegisEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/aegis/pkg/cache/lease.rs:144: error: -[AegisEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[AegisEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring AegisEmberRelayFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: Incident timeline — INC-41119\n\n08:02 deploy AegisNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the AegisNimbusFormFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unifie les validateurs de AegisNimbusFormService","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Why is AegisMapleQueueService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: # projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n[worker.aegisledgergatecoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisledgergatecoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisledgergatecoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisLedgerGateCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41150\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move AegisEmberRelayStore behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41132: retire the legacy replay path for AegisMapleQueueFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged AegisMapleQueueFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move AegisQuartzPlayerStore from the legacy store to NATS JetStream. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft AegisSpruceDaemonStore's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisBirchMigratorService's SyncWorker.kt needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The next client release depends on a new AegisNovaPickerService capability in projects/aegis/internal/auth/refresh.go, with WebGPU already chosen by the platform group. Implement the endpoint and durable cursor, enforce tenant authorization and idempotency, emit useful spans, cap work per request, and include focused tests for retries, cancellation, and malformed cursors.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisNovaPickerService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisMarbleTokenCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify AegisEchoRegistryStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did AegisWillowCodecService's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: UI ticket DES-41113: finish the compact AegisOspreyJobFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nFramework: SQLite\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Bring AegisOspreyJobFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"AegisNovaPickerCoordinator is blocking the next release because two validators with subtly different error strings. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish AegisNovaPickerCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing WebGPU conventions in projects/aegis/infra/modules/edge/main.tf; keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.75,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says AegisCloudReconcilerStore is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether AegisFernSnapshotStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/aegis/cmd/exporter/main.py and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve AegisSlateEditorStore, assess whether two validators with subtly different error strings is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for AegisPrismCacheCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change AegisPrismCacheCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/aegis/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n- platform constraint: Tokio\n- known complication: a misleading timeout name used in five packages\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: diff --git a/projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nWire AegisEchoRegistryFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41142: retire the legacy replay path for AegisBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for AegisBeaconStoreFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/aegis/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx hat AegisOpalRouterService ein sporadisches Problem im NATS JetStream-Ablauf. Verfolge Queue, Scheduler und Abbruch, vergleiche Hypothesen und finde die Ursache vor jeder Änderung.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- NATS JetStream weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf AegisOpalRouterService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um AegisOpalRouterService mit NATS JetStream kompatibel.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"The API work is done; what remains for AegisSableParserStore is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisSableParserStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around AegisSummitProxyStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For AegisBasilRunnerCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for AegisBasilRunnerCoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go, stay with WebGPU, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged AegisTideWorkerService for a read-only pass because its PostgreSQL 17 boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/aegis/cmd/exporter/main.py\n[worker.aegiscraneworkspacecoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegiscraneworkspacecoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegiscraneworkspacecoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisCraneWorkspaceCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41159\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/cmd/exporter/main.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve AegisLedgerGateStore, assess whether two validators with subtly different error strings is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/aegis/packages/api/openapi.yaml 里的 AegisCoralUploadStore 最近在 SQLite 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请给出阶段、兼容层、指标、rollback 和 ownership，先不要修改代码。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 SQLite\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 AegisCoralUploadStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Observation: # projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc\n[worker.aegisdeltacanvasflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisdeltacanvasflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisdeltacanvasflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisDeltaCanvasFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41116\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: projects/aegis/pkg/cache/lease.rs now contains AegisCloudReconcilerFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up AegisTideWorkerCoordinator. First, separate AegisTideWorkerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts, which follows PostgreSQL 17 conventions and currently suffers from duplicate retries after a network handoff. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach AegisMosaicGridStore to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisBeaconStoreCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does AegisFrostPanelStore's WebGPU worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: Ticket OPS-41139: retire the legacy replay path for AegisIrisBatchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess AegisIrisBatchFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell AegisDriftConsoleService's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: // projects/aegis/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class AegisHarborIndexCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit AegisHarborIndexCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisDeltaCanvasCoordinator: polish, then correct","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to AegisPineMetricsStore rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does AegisCopperBridgeFlow enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip AegisMoonlitSDKStore's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited AegisOspreyJobStore and need a careful read of projects/aegis/config/staging.toml before I can sign off on the next release. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing SQLite deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisOspreyJobStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the AegisMicaProfileStore validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: Two engineers disagree about whether AegisIrisBatchService's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/aegis/cmd/exporter/main.py and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisAtlasSearchCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bump AegisLumenChartService's timeout to 30s","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-41125: finish the compact AegisBirchMigratorFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nFramework: PostgreSQL 17\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring AegisBirchMigratorFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/aegis/pkg/cache/lease.rs and tell me whether AegisSlateEditorService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ist AegisNimbusFormStore sicher?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: # projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.aegisorbitsyncflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisorbitsyncflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisorbitsyncflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisOrbitSyncFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41141\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: Ticket OPS-41112: retire the legacy replay path for AegisNovaPickerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess AegisNovaPickerFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate AegisOrbitSyncStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set AegisRavenSessionStore's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around AegisPineMetricsService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisPineMetricsService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-41111\n\n08:02 deploy AegisOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise AegisOpalRouterFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41148: retire the legacy replay path for AegisSlateEditorFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess AegisSlateEditorFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisSlateEditorCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: # projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.aegisveladrawerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisveladrawerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisveladrawerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisVelaDrawerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41134\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence AegisGarnetModalService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current AegisHarborIndexService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisHarborIndexService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: Ticket OPS-41144: retire the legacy replay path for AegisWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged AegisWrenExportFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate AegisCedarPolicyFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: Ticket OPS-41136: retire the legacy replay path for AegisSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible AegisSummitProxyFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisWrenExportCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisSummitProxyCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: projects/aegis/engine/render/atlas.cpp has grown through several launches, and AegisCopperBridgeService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing NATS JetStream deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisCopperBridgeService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrija o timeout de AegisBasilRunnerService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"CI: Ticket OPS-41118: retire the legacy replay path for AegisMoonlitSDKFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess AegisMoonlitSDKFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged AegisAsterWebhookService for a read-only pass because its WebGPU boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across AegisCopperBridgeStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe AegisSableParserService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why is AegisDeltaCanvasService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around AegisCloudReconcilerService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside AegisCloudReconcilerService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThe relevant code crosses payments, iOS, Kubernetes. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is AegisAtlasSearchFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/aegis/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n[worker.aegisfrostpanelflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisfrostpanelflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisfrostpanelflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisFrostPanelFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41147\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around AegisBirchMigratorCoordinator: (1) change AegisBirchMigratorCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: Is there a cleaner way to separate AegisCraneWorkspaceFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/aegis/config/staging.toml, AegisCedarPolicyService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de SQLite. Añade el endpoint idempotente con cursor durable, autorización tenant, spans y tests de retry.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con SQLite\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a AegisCedarPolicyService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con SQLite alrededor de AegisCedarPolicyService.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended AegisJuniperCLIService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current NATS JetStream operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/aegis/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.aegisfernsnapshotflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisfernsnapshotflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisfernsnapshotflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisFernSnapshotFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41149\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/aegis/ml/pipeline/features.py. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind AegisWrenExportService's Tokio choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisWrenExportStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move AegisVelaDrawerStore from the legacy store to Tokio. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited AegisDeltaCanvasStore and need a careful read of projects/aegis/engine/render/atlas.cpp before I can sign off on the next release. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing NATS JetStream deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisDeltaCanvasStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/aegis/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for AegisOpalRouterCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate AegisOpalRouterCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n- platform constraint: NATS JetStream\n- known complication: a query plan that changes after statistics refresh\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of AegisGarnetModalStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/aegis/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisRavenSessionCoordinator: sequence, then ship","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is AegisRavenSessionFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move AegisBeaconStoreService from the legacy store to WebGPU. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisAtlasSearchStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match AegisMoonlitSDKService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisCinderAuthCoordinator: sequence, then ship","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for AegisLedgerGateService, and the basic data flow in projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts already works. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisLedgerGateService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the AegisEchoRegistryService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: # projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n[worker.aegistideworkerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegistideworkerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegistideworkerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisTideWorkerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41110\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/aegis/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: We need to move AegisPineMetricsFlow from the legacy store to WebGPU. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: // projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class AegisMosaicGridFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Split AegisMosaicGridFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/aegis/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and tell me whether AegisAmberFilterStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Make AegisFlintTimelineService keyboard navigable","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisFernSnapshotCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind AegisAtlasSearchService's SQLite choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisSpruceDaemonCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for AegisSpruceDaemonCoordinator, plus then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Use projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc as the source of truth, preserve the NATS JetStream contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisMapleQueueCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for AegisMapleQueueCoordinator, plus then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Use projects/aegis/infra/modules/edge/main.tf as the source of truth, preserve the WebGPU contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: diff --git a/projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go b/projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go\n+++ b/projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is AegisGarnetModalFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisRainfallDBStore occasionally exhibits cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary, but only after a reconnect. Follow the data and cancellation paths in projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and identify the cause before changing anything.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-41133: finish the compact AegisKiteSchedulerFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nFramework: SQLite\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete AegisKiteSchedulerFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: // projects/aegis/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nfinal class AegisCloudReconcilerCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about AegisCloudReconcilerCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: The AegisMosaicGridService empty state in projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a AegisVelaDrawerService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisNimbusFormCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisEmberRelayService leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: projects/aegis/config/staging.toml の AegisCoralUploadService で、SQLite の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 queue、scheduler、cancel 経路を追い、仮説を比較して、変更前に原因を特定してください。\n\n制約:\n- SQLite を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は AegisCoralUploadService のみ","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Iris: The AegisBeaconStoreStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in AegisAcornWidgetStore lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around AegisDriftConsoleCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/aegis/services/ledger/replay.go recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: # projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc\n[worker.aegiscopperbridgecoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegiscopperbridgecoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegiscopperbridgecoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisCopperBridgeCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41156\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/aegis/lib/codec/frame.cc and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=aegisbasilrunnerflow pod=aegisbasilrunnerflow-7cf8 request_id=41127 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=aegisbasilrunnerflow request_id=41127 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nReconstruct the AegisBasilRunnerFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41157: retire the legacy replay path for AegisAsterWebhookCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess AegisAsterWebhookCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split AegisCinderAuthStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For AegisLumenChartCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for AegisLumenChartCoordinator; once that is complete, consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Work from projects/aegis/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, stay with Tokio, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Payments: Support wants the behavior in projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisMosaicGridCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give AegisKiteSchedulerService a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-41143: finish the compact AegisCoralUploadFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/aegis/config/staging.toml\nFramework: SQLite\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring AegisCoralUploadFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: Split projects/aegis/packages/api/openapi.yaml by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisWillowCodecCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for AegisWillowCodecCoordinator, plus then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Use projects/aegis/cmd/exporter/main.py as the source of truth, preserve the Tokio contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-41126: retire the legacy replay path for AegisSpruceDaemonFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nDeliver the AegisSpruceDaemonFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de AegisBasilRunnerStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"AegisMicaProfileCoordinator: document, then correct","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up AegisOspreyJobCoordinator. First, produce a consumer guide for AegisOspreyJobCoordinator. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/aegis/config/staging.toml, which follows SQLite conventions and currently suffers from memory growth during hour-long imports. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map AegisRavenSessionService's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-41129\n\n08:02 deploy AegisWillowCodecFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Turn the material above into a concise AegisWillowCodecFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"AegisSableParserCoordinator is blocking the next release because stale cursors when a page is resumed. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish AegisSableParserCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing PostgreSQL 17 conventions in projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt; keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a deadlock that appears only during shutdown in AegisRainfallDBFlow, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The AegisFernSnapshotService surface in projects/aegis/ml/pipeline/features.py is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename AegisLumenChartStore's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/aegis/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex の AegisJuniperCLIFlow で、NATS JetStream の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- NATS JetStream を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は AegisJuniperCLIFlow のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Any races in AegisMicaProfileService?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts has grown through several launches, and AegisTideWorkerStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to AegisTideWorkerStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans payments, iOS, Kubernetes; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nThe individual edits look tiny, but the semantic cleanup spans the repository and must preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"AegisAmberFilterCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For AegisKiteSchedulerCoordinator, ship the idempotent AegisKiteSchedulerCoordinator replay endpoint; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/aegis/config/staging.toml, stay with SQLite, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: # projects/aegis/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.aegisquartzplayerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.aegisquartzplayerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.aegisquartzplayerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.AegisQuartzPlayerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-41146\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/aegis/engine/render/atlas.cpp. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the AegisMapleQueueStore changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of AegisOspreyJobService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/aegis/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this payments, iOS, Kubernetes monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/aegis/src/sync/reconcile.ts, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/aegis/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, o AegisMarbleTokenStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de PostgreSQL 17. Finalize o layout responsivo, estados vazio e retry, foco por teclado, dark mode e reduced motion.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com PostgreSQL 17\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao AegisMarbleTokenStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"AegisAcornWidgetCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in AegisPrismCacheService?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Queue AegisKiteSchedulerStore's expired sessions","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: Ticket OPS-41140: retire the legacy replay path for AegisAmberFilterFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the AegisAmberFilterFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: Ticket OPS-41152: retire the legacy replay path for AegisPineMetricsCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the AegisPineMetricsCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Investigate the AegisCinderAuthService hang","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42142\n\n08:02 deploy BorealNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current BorealNimbusFormFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a BorealFlintTimelineService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve BorealGarnetModalStore, assess whether lost focus when the drawer animation finishes is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for BorealOpalRouterService, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealBirchMigratorCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set BorealSlateEditorService's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: # projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.borealravensessionflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.borealravensessionflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.borealravensessionflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.BorealRavenSessionFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-42143\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale BorealIrisBatchService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe BorealOrbitSyncService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat BorealRainfallDBStore","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Why does BorealLumenChartService's Kafka worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give BorealCraneWorkspaceService a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: // projects/boreal/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class BorealFrostPanelFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate BorealFrostPanelFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSummitProxyService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Cloudflare Workers operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: // projects/boreal/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nfinal class BorealJuniperCLIFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about BorealJuniperCLIFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealFlintTimelineCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42115: retire the legacy replay path for BorealBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current BorealBeaconStoreFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealJuniperCLICoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for BorealJuniperCLICoordinator, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/boreal/pkg/cache/lease.rs as the source of truth, preserve the Cloudflare Workers contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: Incident timeline — INC-42136\n\n08:02 deploy BorealOspreyJobFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the BorealOspreyJobFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealQuartzPlayerCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealMicaProfileCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: Release verification found a single stale BorealAmberFilterStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Kotlin coroutines operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'BorealEchoRegistryCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[BorealEchoRegistryCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue:144: error: -[BorealEchoRegistryCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[BorealEchoRegistryCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Use the UI evidence to complete BorealEchoRegistryCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for BorealNimbusFormService events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp now contains BorealWillowCodecStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Incident timeline — INC-42140\n\n08:02 deploy BorealGarnetModalFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise BorealGarnetModalFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give BorealMoonlitSDKStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'BorealKiteSchedulerCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[BorealKiteSchedulerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/boreal/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql:144: error: -[BorealKiteSchedulerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[BorealKiteSchedulerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nReconstruct the BorealKiteSchedulerCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: The destination for BorealWrenExportStore is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/boreal/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex to that target. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealWrenExportStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind BorealDriftConsoleStore's Cloudflare Workers choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through BorealFernSnapshotStore's atlas.cpp","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new BorealSpruceDaemonStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind BorealCinderAuthStore's GraphQL choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42157: retire the legacy replay path for BorealVelaDrawerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current BorealVelaDrawerCoordinator behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py b/projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py\n+++ b/projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate BorealNovaPickerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around BorealBirchMigratorService now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dokumentiere BorealQuartzPlayerStore kurz","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"For BorealHarborIndexCoordinator, separate BorealHarborIndexCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/boreal/internal/auth/refresh.go, stay with Kotlin coroutines, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is BorealBeaconStoreService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, BorealBasilRunnerFlow's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around BorealCedarPolicyCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of two validators with subtly different error strings; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSableParserService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/boreal/lib/codec/frame.cc has grown through several launches, and BorealIrisBatchStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealIrisBatchStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSpruceDaemonCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSableParserCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_42122'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_42122'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDetermine why BorealFernSnapshotFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealNimbusFormCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealAcornWidgetCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.27,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSlateEditorCoordinator: sequence, then polish","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealPrismCacheService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move BorealSummitProxyFlow's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/boreal/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The BorealDeltaCanvasStore empty state in projects/boreal/config/staging.toml needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current BorealEmberRelayService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealEmberRelayService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, BorealCinderAuthService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealRainfallDBCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate BorealRainfallDBCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/boreal/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx as the source of truth, preserve the Kafka contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current BorealDriftConsoleService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealDriftConsoleService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: BorealMarbleTokenService has one known configuration mistake in projects/boreal/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, not an open-ended failure investigation. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Kotlin coroutines deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealMarbleTokenService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42128\n\n08:02 deploy BorealHarborIndexFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise BorealHarborIndexFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure BorealPineMetricsFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/boreal/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt hat BorealAtlasSearchService ein sporadisches Problem im GraphQL-Ablauf. Vervollständige Responsive Layout, Empty- und Retry-State, Tastaturfokus, Dark Mode und Reduced Motion.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- GraphQL weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf BorealAtlasSearchService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um BorealAtlasSearchService mit GraphQL kompatibel.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Split BorealAsterWebhookStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across BorealMarbleTokenFlow's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n[worker.borealquartzplayerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.borealquartzplayerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.borealquartzplayerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.BorealQuartzPlayerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-42119\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe BorealFrostPanelStore's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Stream BorealFernSnapshotService's audit events","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does BorealOspreyJobStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for BorealFlintTimelineStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealOrbitSyncCoordinator is blocking the next release because cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/boreal/crates/index/src/segment.rs, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Cloudflare Workers conventions in projects/boreal/crates/index/src/segment.rs; leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42114: retire the legacy replay path for BorealOrbitSyncFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess BorealOrbitSyncFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealOspreyJobCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new BorealVelaDrawerStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove BorealFrostPanelService's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealGarnetModalCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: The BorealMicaProfileStore surface in projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue 里的 BorealRavenSessionStore 最近在 Kotlin coroutines 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Kotlin coroutines\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 BorealRavenSessionStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up BorealBeaconStoreCoordinator. First, finish BorealBeaconStoreCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py, which follows Spring Boot conventions and currently suffers from a feature flag whose default differs between environments. Leave generated files and vendored code alone.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: Two asks around BorealCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: (1) change BorealCraneWorkspaceCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: Ticket OPS-42151: retire the legacy replay path for BorealEmberRelayCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current BorealEmberRelayCoordinator behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did BorealHarborIndexService's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/boreal/infra/modules/edge/main.tf:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: borealbirchmigratorflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/boreal/infra/modules/edge/main.tf:217:18\n   4: borealbirchmigratorflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nFind the source of this BorealBirchMigratorFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'BorealSpruceDaemonFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[BorealSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/boreal/config/staging.toml:144: error: -[BorealSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[BorealSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nDetermine why BorealSpruceDaemonFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 42147: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Kafka\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] BorealLumenChartFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] BorealLumenChartFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nWire BorealLumenChartFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: projects/boreal/src/sync/reconcile.ts now contains BorealKiteSchedulerFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'BorealWrenExportFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[BorealWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/boreal/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx:144: error: -[BorealWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[BorealWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete BorealWrenExportFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: # projects/boreal/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n[worker.borealprismcacheflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.borealprismcacheflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.borealprismcacheflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.BorealPrismCacheFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-42137\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. The intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/boreal/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: // projects/boreal/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nfinal class BorealAsterWebhookFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit BorealAsterWebhookFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42112\n\n08:02 deploy BorealIrisBatchFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the BorealIrisBatchFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42129: retire the legacy replay path for BorealCopperBridgeFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Turn the artifact into a reversible BorealCopperBridgeFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer BorealCraneWorkspaceStore cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-42110: finish the compact BorealMosaicGridFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/boreal/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nFramework: Spring Boot\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible BorealMosaicGridFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue b/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n+++ b/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit BorealTideWorkerFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealCinderAuthCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should BorealLedgerGateStore be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py, o BorealNovaPickerStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Spring Boot. Proponha fases, compatibilidade, métricas, rollback e ownership; pare antes de alterar código.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Spring Boot\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao BorealNovaPickerStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: Incident timeline — INC-42146\n\n08:02 deploy BorealCinderAuthFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise BorealCinderAuthFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around BorealOpalRouterStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: The BorealWillowCodecFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the BorealMosaicGridService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealMosaicGridService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealMapleQueueStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealAsterWebhookCoordinator needs a paired pass: change BorealAsterWebhookCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/boreal/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift as the source of truth, preserve the Spring Boot contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealCopperBridgeService flakes under UTC","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go の BorealRavenSessionService で、Kotlin coroutines の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 responsive layout、empty/retry state、keyboard focus、dark mode、reduced motion を仕上げてください。\n\n制約:\n- Kotlin coroutines を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は BorealRavenSessionService のみ","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: BorealMarbleTokenStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealMarbleTokenStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: // projects/boreal/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nfinal class BorealRainfallDBFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about BorealRainfallDBFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-42134: finish the compact BorealOpalRouterFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/boreal/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nFramework: Cloudflare Workers\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible BorealOpalRouterFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through BorealJuniperCLIService's segment.rs","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealPrismCacheCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealDeltaCanvasCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the BorealWrenExportService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealMoonlitSDKCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml b/projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n+++ b/projects/boreal/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit BorealDeltaCanvasFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match BorealPineMetricsService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42158\n\n08:02 deploy BorealMarbleTokenCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise BorealMarbleTokenCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a BorealDriftConsoleFlow changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why is BorealLedgerGateService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let BorealDeltaCanvasService adopt Cloudflare Workers with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Enforce BorealTideWorkerStore's idempotency key","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of BorealCoralUploadStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current GraphQL operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de BorealRainfallDBService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current BorealAmberFilterService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealAmberFilterService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract BorealCedarPolicyService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does BorealPineMetricsStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/boreal/cmd/exporter/main.py has grown through several launches, and BorealBeaconStoreStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealBeaconStoreStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42155: retire the legacy replay path for BorealMapleQueueCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged BorealMapleQueueCoordinator migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: diff --git a/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue b/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n+++ b/projects/boreal/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Restructure BorealAmberFilterFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"BorealSableParserStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/boreal/infra/modules/edge/main.tf value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale BorealKiteSchedulerService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current GraphQL operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: Ticket OPS-42150: retire the legacy replay path for BorealBasilRunnerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess BorealBasilRunnerCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does BorealJuniperCLIStore own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer BorealAcornWidgetService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: Incident timeline — INC-42144\n\n08:02 deploy BorealFlintTimelineFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for BorealFlintTimelineFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: # projects/boreal/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.borealacornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.borealacornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.borealacornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.BorealAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-42118\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/boreal/internal/auth/refresh.go. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte の BorealEmberRelayFlow で、GraphQL の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 consumer 向けに contract、error、retry、コピー可能な例を含む文書を書き、handler は変更しないでください。\n\n制約:\n- GraphQL を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は BorealEmberRelayFlow のみ","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for BorealMosaicGridCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: finish BorealMosaicGridCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/boreal/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n- platform constraint: Spring Boot\n- known complication: two validators with subtly different error strings\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Leave generated files and vendored code alone; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the BorealVelaDrawerService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealVelaDrawerService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Repository: Release verification found a single stale BorealMosaicGridStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/boreal/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and tell me whether BorealGarnetModalService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the BorealAcornWidgetStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealLumenChartStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/boreal/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give BorealEchoRegistryFlow's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/boreal/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of BorealBasilRunnerService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses computer vision, React, PostgreSQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealFrostPanelCoordinator: sequence, then restructure","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42154\n\n08:02 deploy BorealDriftConsoleCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the BorealDriftConsoleCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat BorealQuartzPlayerService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"How does BorealEchoRegistryStore propagate cancellation through the Kotlin coroutines boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter BorealAtlasSearchFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × BorealAtlasSearchFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=42111 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=42111 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=42111 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=42111 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the BorealAtlasSearchFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: What is the safest way to split projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte into independently owned modules while BorealMoonlitSDKService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded BorealBasilRunnerStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up BorealIrisBatchCoordinator. First, separate BorealIrisBatchCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/boreal/lib/codec/frame.cc, which follows Kafka conventions and currently suffers from a misleading timeout name used in five packages. Leave generated files and vendored code alone.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For BorealPineMetricsCoordinator, finish BorealPineMetricsCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py, stay with Spring Boot, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, BorealAtlasSearchStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de GraphQL. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con GraphQL\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a BorealAtlasSearchStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con GraphQL alrededor de BorealAtlasSearchStore.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"BorealLumenChartCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around BorealCopperBridgeCoordinator: (1) ship the idempotent BorealCopperBridgeCoordinator replay endpoint; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify BorealSlateEditorStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-42116: finish the compact BorealCoralUploadFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/boreal/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nFramework: GraphQL\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible BorealCoralUploadFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealTideWorkerCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go as the source of truth, preserve the Kotlin coroutines contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify BorealCloudReconcilerService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: borealmoonlitsdkflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:217:18\n   4: borealmoonlitsdkflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the BorealMoonlitSDKFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42159: retire the legacy replay path for BorealSummitProxyCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess BorealSummitProxyCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealOpalRouterCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealSpruceDaemonService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for BorealAmberFilterCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate BorealAmberFilterCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go\n- platform constraint: Kotlin coroutines\n- known complication: stale cursors when a page is resumed\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Leave generated files and vendored code alone; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare BorealHarborIndexStore's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The BorealOspreyJobService feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealNovaPickerCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For BorealCloudReconcilerCoordinator, finish BorealCloudReconcilerCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, stay with GraphQL, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The first BorealPrismCacheStore request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealWrenExportCoordinator: ship, then document","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte b/projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n+++ b/projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Split BorealSlateEditorFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: Ticket OPS-42131: retire the legacy replay path for BorealCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise BorealCloudReconcilerFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealLedgerGateCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/boreal/ml/pipeline/features.py 里的 BorealNovaPickerService 最近在 Spring Boot 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请写一份面向调用方的说明，包含 contract、错误、retry 和可复制示例，不要改 handler。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Spring Boot\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 BorealNovaPickerService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Rename BorealTideWorkerService's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-42145: retire the legacy replay path for BorealMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Map a safe route from the current BorealMicaProfileFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"En projects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go, BorealEchoRegistryService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Kotlin coroutines. Lee el flujo actual y dime si ownership, cancelación y orden son seguros; solo necesito el análisis.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Kotlin coroutines\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a BorealEchoRegistryService","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"BorealCoralUploadCoordinator: polish, then assess","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Persist BorealCoralUploadService's replay cursor","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter BorealCraneWorkspaceFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × BorealCraneWorkspaceFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=42132 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=42132 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=42132 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=42132 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the BorealCraneWorkspaceFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-42138\n\n08:02 deploy BorealSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for BorealSableParserFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in BorealMicaProfileService lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: BorealOrbitSyncStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside BorealOrbitSyncStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nThis repository spans computer vision, React, PostgreSQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealAtlasSearchCoordinator is blocking the next release because memory growth during hour-long imports. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change BorealAtlasSearchCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing GraphQL conventions in projects/boreal/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte; leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the BorealCloudReconcilerStore changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does BorealBirchMigratorStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect BorealMapleQueueService to outgrow its current Spring Boot arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealMapleQueueService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_42126'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_42126'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nWire BorealCedarPolicyFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealFernSnapshotCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp b/projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n+++ b/projects/boreal/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is BorealWillowCodecCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in BorealMapleQueueFlow lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did BorealCedarPolicyStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate BorealVelaDrawerFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe BorealAsterWebhookService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect BorealSummitProxyStore to outgrow its current Cloudflare Workers arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Cloudflare Workers deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealSummitProxyStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is BorealCopperBridgeStore safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: BorealWillowCodecService has one known configuration mistake in projects/boreal/lib/codec/frame.cc, not an open-ended failure investigation. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to BorealWillowCodecService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this computer vision, React, PostgreSQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"BorealRavenSessionCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'BorealLedgerGateFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[BorealLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/boreal/services/ledger/replay.go:144: error: -[BorealLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[BorealLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete BorealLedgerGateFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaKiteSchedulerStore's FilterDrawer.vue needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ist CalderaCinderAuthStore sicher?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let CalderaOrbitSyncService adopt Swift 6 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around CalderaDriftConsoleCoordinator: (1) separate CalderaDriftConsoleCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: Ticket OPS-43138: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the CalderaBeaconStoreFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaWrenExportCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaAmberFilterStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/caldera/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: The CalderaCedarPolicyStore empty state in projects/caldera/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43123\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaBasilRunnerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current CalderaBasilRunnerFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for CalderaFernSnapshotStore across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py\nfinal class CalderaSableParserFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about CalderaSableParserFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de CalderaDriftConsoleStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: diff --git a/projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is CalderaHarborIndexCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for CalderaNimbusFormCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n- platform constraint: gRPC\n- known complication: out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Do not introduce another runtime dependency; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaBirchMigratorCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: We expect CalderaMoonlitSDKStore to outgrow its current FastAPI arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaMoonlitSDKStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited CalderaPrismCacheService and need a careful read of projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs before I can sign off on the next release. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaPrismCacheService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de CalderaCinderAuthService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"CalderaBeaconStoreService's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The destination for CalderaGarnetModalStore is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/caldera/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx to that target. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaGarnetModalStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py: remove the obsolete CalderaHarborIndexStore import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: CalderaRavenSessionStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaRavenSessionStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-43155: finish the compact CalderaCraneWorkspaceCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/caldera/config/staging.toml\nFramework: gRPC\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete CalderaCraneWorkspaceCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/caldera/config/staging.toml 里的 CalderaIrisBatchService 最近在 gRPC 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请写一份面向调用方的说明，包含 contract、错误、retry 和可复制示例，不要改 handler。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 gRPC\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 CalderaIrisBatchService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: CalderaHarborIndexService has one known configuration mistake in projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing OpenTelemetry deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaHarborIndexService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaFernSnapshotCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For CalderaEchoRegistryCoordinator, separate CalderaEchoRegistryCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/caldera/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, stay with OpenTelemetry, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaSlateEditorCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaCinderAuthCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaBeaconStoreCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaOrbitSyncCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 43116: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: OpenTelemetry\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] CalderaRavenSessionFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] CalderaRavenSessionFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nWire CalderaRavenSessionFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure CalderaPineMetricsFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/caldera/services/ledger/replay.go by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of CalderaCraneWorkspaceService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/caldera/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, CalderaAsterWebhookService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Room. La causa ya está clara: cambia solo el timeout de staging de 15 a 30 segundos y ajusta su assertion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Room\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a CalderaAsterWebhookService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: diff --git a/projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml b/projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n+++ b/projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Read the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is CalderaFernSnapshotFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Currently: projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py の CalderaHarborIndexFlow で、OpenTelemetry の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 responsive layout、empty/retry state、keyboard focus、dark mode、reduced motion を仕上げてください。\n\n制約:\n- OpenTelemetry を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は CalderaHarborIndexFlow のみ","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'CalderaPrismCacheFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[CalderaPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs:144: error: -[CalderaPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[CalderaPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete CalderaPrismCacheFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new CalderaCraneWorkspaceStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaCedarPolicyCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: Is there a cleaner way to separate CalderaCraneWorkspaceFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe CalderaKiteSchedulerService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/caldera/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 43122: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Swift 6\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] CalderaSpruceDaemonFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] CalderaSpruceDaemonFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nReconstruct the CalderaSpruceDaemonFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for CalderaOpalRouterFlow across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaPrismCacheCoordinator is blocking the next release because a misleading timeout name used in five packages. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: ship the idempotent CalderaPrismCacheCoordinator replay endpoint, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing gRPC conventions in projects/caldera/pkg/cache/lease.rs; do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaWillowCodecCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for CalderaWillowCodecCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/caldera/config/staging.toml as the source of truth, preserve the gRPC contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up CalderaSableParserCoordinator. First, separate CalderaSableParserCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py, which follows OpenTelemetry conventions and currently suffers from stale cursors when a page is resumed. Do not introduce another runtime dependency.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaJuniperCLICoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the CalderaTideWorkerService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaTideWorkerService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: The data is already available in projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around CalderaDeltaCanvasService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaDeltaCanvasService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does CalderaOpalRouterStore's Swift 6 worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts now contains CalderaQuartzPlayerStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the CalderaMosaicGridStore wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: The behavior of CalderaNovaPickerService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current Room operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for CalderaCloudReconcilerService, and the basic data flow in projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go already works. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaCloudReconcilerService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does CalderaEmberRelayStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for CalderaBeaconStoreStore events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.calderasummitproxyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.calderasummitproxyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.calderasummitproxyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.CalderaSummitProxyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-43132\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: The first CalderaAcornWidgetStore request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: # projects/caldera/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.calderagarnetmodalflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.calderagarnetmodalflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.calderagarnetmodalflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.CalderaGarnetModalFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-43113\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Align CalderaGarnetModalFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around CalderaMosaicGridCoordinator: (1) produce a consumer guide for CalderaMosaicGridCoordinator; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaSpruceDaemonCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify CalderaSpruceDaemonService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaFrostPanelCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-43136: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaAmberFilterFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise CalderaAmberFilterFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: # projects/caldera/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n[worker.calderawrenexportflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.calderawrenexportflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.calderawrenexportflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.CalderaWrenExportFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-43140\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign CalderaWrenExportFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For CalderaSummitProxyCoordinator, ship the idempotent CalderaSummitProxyCoordinator replay endpoint; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql, stay with Swift 6, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaMarbleTokenCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for CalderaMarbleTokenCoordinator, plus consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py as the source of truth, preserve the OpenTelemetry contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaRainfallDBStore needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by gRPC; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The CalderaCoralUploadService empty state in projects/caldera/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for CalderaDeltaCanvasCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate CalderaDeltaCanvasCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n- platform constraint: Swift 6\n- known complication: cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Do not introduce another runtime dependency; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/caldera/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex 里的 CalderaFrostPanelStore 最近在 Room 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请写一份面向调用方的说明，包含 contract、错误、retry 和可复制示例，不要改 handler。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Room\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 CalderaFrostPanelStore","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Why is CalderaLumenChartStore stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer CalderaFlintTimelineService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename CalderaSummitProxyService's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43131\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaMarbleTokenFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for CalderaMarbleTokenFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split CalderaBirchMigratorStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple CalderaSummitProxyStore's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify CalderaMapleQueueStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give CalderaAsterWebhookStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale CalderaNimbusFormStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace CalderaMarbleTokenService's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaMapleQueueCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish CalderaMapleQueueCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp as the source of truth, preserve the Room contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about CalderaGarnetModalService, but the current prose in projects/caldera/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaGarnetModalService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect CalderaFlintTimelineStore to outgrow its current Swift 6 arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaFlintTimelineStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin CalderaBasilRunnerStore's Room dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-43154: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaCloudReconcilerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise CalderaCloudReconcilerCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Store CalderaMapleQueueService's delivery receipts","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43115\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise CalderaNimbusFormFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence CalderaBasilRunnerService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map CalderaEchoRegistryService's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: Two asks around CalderaEmberRelayCoordinator: (1) change CalderaEmberRelayCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.29,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/caldera/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure CalderaDeltaCanvasFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'CalderaLumenChartFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[CalderaLumenChartFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/caldera/pkg/cache/lease.rs:144: error: -[CalderaLumenChartFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[CalderaLumenChartFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring CalderaLumenChartFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does CalderaLedgerGateStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaAmberFilterCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaQuartzPlayerCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaPineMetricsCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bump CalderaMoonlitSDKService's timeout to 30s","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: // projects/caldera/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nfinal class CalderaMoonlitSDKFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about CalderaMoonlitSDKFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin CalderaWillowCodecService's gRPC dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up CalderaMoonlitSDKCoordinator. First, change CalderaMoonlitSDKCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go, which follows FastAPI conventions and currently suffers from a deadlock that appears only during shutdown. Do not introduce another runtime dependency.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The first CalderaOspreyJobFlow request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should CalderaSpruceDaemonStore be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_43121'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_43121'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Determine why CalderaBirchMigratorFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Give CalderaNimbusFormService a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: Ticket OPS-43158: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaNovaPickerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for CalderaNovaPickerCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does CalderaMosaicGridService own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaLedgerGateCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/caldera/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte has grown through several launches, and CalderaOpalRouterService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaOpalRouterService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind CalderaTideWorkerFlow's OpenTelemetry choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter? The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp and tell me whether CalderaPineMetricsStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_43149'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_43149'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nReconstruct the CalderaCedarPolicyFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/caldera/packages/api/openapi.yaml, o CalderaIrisBatchStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de gRPC. Leia o fluxo atual e avalie ownership, cancelamento e ordem; preciso apenas da análise.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com gRPC\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao CalderaIrisBatchStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"FYI: # projects/caldera/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.calderakiteschedulerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.calderakiteschedulerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.calderakiteschedulerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.CalderaKiteSchedulerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-43129\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Make the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/caldera/services/ledger/replay.go. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"In projects/caldera/cmd/exporter/main.py hat CalderaSableParserService ein sporadisches Problem im OpenTelemetry-Ablauf. Trenne Verantwortlichkeiten und entferne Duplikate, ohne API, Wire-Werte, Reihenfolge oder sichtbares Verhalten zu ändern.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- OpenTelemetry weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf CalderaSableParserService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um CalderaSableParserService mit OpenTelemetry kompatibel.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"CalderaAtlasSearchCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaPineMetricsService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match CalderaVelaDrawerStore's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 43143: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Room\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] CalderaFrostPanelFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] CalderaFrostPanelFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nReconstruct the CalderaFrostPanelFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify CalderaVelaDrawerService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn CalderaJuniperCLIStore's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaMicaProfileCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: Incident timeline — INC-43159\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaOspreyJobCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the CalderaOspreyJobCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-43146: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaLedgerGateFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess CalderaLedgerGateFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set CalderaEchoRegistryStore's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaDriftConsoleService é seguro?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around CalderaVelaDrawerCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/caldera/pkg/cache/lease.rs; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says CalderaOspreyJobStore is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current FastAPI operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp has grown through several launches, and CalderaNovaPickerStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to CalderaNovaPickerStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses embedded, Go services, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaLumenChartCoordinator: sequence, then polish","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaCoralUploadCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across CalderaAtlasSearchService's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/caldera/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift and tell me whether CalderaTideWorkerStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in CalderaMicaProfileStore?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43125\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaWillowCodecFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for CalderaWillowCodecFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring CalderaAsterWebhookFlow's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_43135'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_43135'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nFind the source of this CalderaIrisBatchFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set CalderaLumenChartService's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43117\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaFlintTimelineFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current CalderaFlintTimelineFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded CalderaNovaPickerFlow export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-43137: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaOrbitSyncFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Assess CalderaOrbitSyncFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"CalderaFlintTimelineCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: Incident timeline — INC-43119\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaCinderAuthFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible CalderaCinderAuthFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: The data is already available in projects/caldera/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: Incident timeline — INC-43147\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaJuniperCLIFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the CalderaJuniperCLIFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: Incident timeline — INC-43130\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaVelaDrawerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nDetermine why CalderaVelaDrawerFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'CalderaEmberRelayFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[CalderaEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go:144: error: -[CalderaEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[CalderaEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible CalderaEmberRelayFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current CalderaOspreyJobService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaOspreyJobService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of CalderaCopperBridgeService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaCloudReconcilerFlow's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaAcornWidgetCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does CalderaFernSnapshotService propagate cancellation through the gRPC boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across CalderaLedgerGateService's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaBasilRunnerCoordinator: polish, then correct","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could CalderaCopperBridgeStore show the active Swift 6 sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/caldera/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit CalderaRainfallDBCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=calderacoraluploadflow pod=calderacoraluploadflow-7cf8 request_id=43139 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=calderacoraluploadflow request_id=43139 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nDetermine why CalderaCoralUploadFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaGarnetModalCoordinator is blocking the next release because a feature flag whose default differs between environments. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change CalderaGarnetModalCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Room conventions in projects/caldera/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx; do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended CalderaDeltaCanvasStore independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans embedded, Go services, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract CalderaMarbleTokenStore's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Drop CalderaRavenSessionService's unused import","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for CalderaBirchMigratorService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: Ticket OPS-43134: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible CalderaAtlasSearchFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For CalderaKiteSchedulerCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for CalderaKiteSchedulerCoordinator; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/caldera/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, stay with FastAPI, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current CalderaRainfallDBService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaRainfallDBService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft CalderaMicaProfileService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/caldera/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class CalderaEchoRegistryFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about CalderaEchoRegistryFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/caldera/services/ledger/replay.go recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: // projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py\nfinal class CalderaAcornWidgetFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit CalderaAcornWidgetFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/caldera/ml/pipeline/features.py, CalderaSableParserStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de OpenTelemetry. Termina el layout responsive, estados vacío y retry, foco por teclado, dark mode y reduced motion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con OpenTelemetry\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a CalderaSableParserStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Delta: projects/caldera/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx の CalderaFrostPanelService で、Room の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 queue、scheduler、cancel 経路を追い、仮説を比較して、変更前に原因を特定してください。\n\n制約:\n- Room を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は CalderaFrostPanelService のみ","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Ember: The minimum supported FastAPI version in projects/caldera/infra/modules/edge/main.tf is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_43156'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_43156'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nFind the source of this CalderaTideWorkerCoordinator symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: The API work is done; what remains for CalderaPrismCacheStore is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside CalderaPrismCacheStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nSeveral teams work in this embedded, Go services, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did CalderaWillowCodecStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go and tell me whether CalderaSlateEditorService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp b/projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n+++ b/projects/caldera/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is CalderaMicaProfileFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: The CalderaRainfallDBFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: diff --git a/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/caldera/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nWire CalderaMapleQueueFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/caldera/internal/auth/refresh.go\nfinal class CalderaSlateEditorFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about CalderaSlateEditorFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Serve CalderaEmberRelayService health checks","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a CalderaQuartzPlayerService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/caldera/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte into independently owned modules while CalderaOrbitSyncStore's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: diff --git a/projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/caldera/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure CalderaQuartzPlayerFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-43127: finish the compact CalderaDriftConsoleFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/caldera/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nFramework: Swift 6\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible CalderaDriftConsoleFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaIrisBatchCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-43153\n\n08:02 deploy CalderaAsterWebhookCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Capture the CalderaAsterWebhookCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-43152: retire the legacy replay path for CalderaCopperBridgeCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible CalderaCopperBridgeCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could CalderaWrenExportService show the active gRPC sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/caldera/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: calderamosaicgridflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/caldera/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:217:18\n   4: calderamosaicgridflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nDetermine why CalderaMosaicGridFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: // projects/caldera/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nfinal class CalderaOpalRouterCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure CalderaOpalRouterCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CalderaRavenSessionCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve CalderaSlateEditorStore, assess whether two validators with subtly different error strings is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: projects/dovetail/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte 里的 DovetailLumenChartStore 最近在 Playwright 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Playwright\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 DovetailLumenChartStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Does DovetailSableParserService enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate DovetailSummitProxyStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'DovetailEmberRelayFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[DovetailEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/dovetail/ml/pipeline/features.py:144: error: -[DovetailEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[DovetailEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible DovetailEmberRelayFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: # projects/dovetail/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.dovetailnimbusformflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailnimbusformflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailnimbusformflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailNimbusFormFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44138\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/dovetail/src/sync/reconcile.ts and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of DovetailWrenExportService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/dovetail/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Playwright operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailFlintTimelineCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: The DovetailVelaDrawerFlow surface in projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged DovetailMarbleTokenService for a read-only pass because its Terraform boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Terraform operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-44128: finish the compact DovetailCraneWorkspaceFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/dovetail/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nFramework: Playwright\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring DovetailCraneWorkspaceFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does DovetailAmberFilterFlow propagate cancellation through the Terraform boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous? Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, o DovetailDeltaCanvasStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Redis Streams. A causa já é conhecida: mude apenas o timeout de staging de 15 para 30 segundos e ajuste a assertion.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Redis Streams\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao DovetailDeltaCanvasStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"For DovetailPrismCacheCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, stay with Playwright, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-44148\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailWillowCodecFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible DovetailWillowCodecFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailJuniperCLICoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py into independently owned modules while DovetailMoonlitSDKService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename DovetailTideWorkerStore's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-44133: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailPrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for DovetailPrismCacheFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: dovetailcopperbridgeflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue:217:18\n   4: dovetailcopperbridgeflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nFind the source of this DovetailCopperBridgeFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does DovetailBasilRunnerService enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailCedarPolicyCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: Ticket OPS-44111: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise DovetailBeaconStoreFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: What does DovetailOspreyJobService own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is DovetailTideWorkerService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale DovetailSlateEditorStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Core Data operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: Incident timeline — INC-44116\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailFrostPanelFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current DovetailFrostPanelFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind DovetailDriftConsoleStore's Redis Streams choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailFlintTimelineService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around DovetailCopperBridgeCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of stale cursors when a page is resumed; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailPineMetricsCoordinator: ship, then document","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe DovetailFernSnapshotStore's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: Ticket OPS-44149: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailEchoRegistryFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current DovetailEchoRegistryFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/dovetail/config/staging.toml, DovetailBeaconStoreStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de React 19. La causa ya está clara: cambia solo el timeout de staging de 15 a 30 segundos y ajusta su assertion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con React 19\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a DovetailBeaconStoreStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"DovetailRavenSessionService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: Incident timeline — INC-44118\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailFernSnapshotFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible DovetailFernSnapshotFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for DovetailAcornWidgetCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/dovetail/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/dovetail/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n- platform constraint: Terraform\n- known complication: an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Make rollback possible without deleting user data; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailCoralUploadCoordinator is blocking the next release because a deadlock that appears only during shutdown. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: find the unknown cause of a deadlock that appears only during shutdown, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Core Data conventions in projects/dovetail/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n[worker.dovetailasterwebhookflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailasterwebhookflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailasterwebhookflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailAsterWebhookFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44126\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, DovetailCinderAuthService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: Incident timeline — INC-44156\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailMosaicGridCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise DovetailMosaicGridCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: Ticket OPS-44143: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailLumenChartFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the DovetailLumenChartFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around DovetailWillowCodecStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx b/projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n+++ b/projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Read the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is DovetailTideWorkerFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"DovetailMicaProfileCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-44113: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Add the bounded DovetailWrenExportFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Ticket OPS-44136: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailGarnetModalFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess DovetailGarnetModalFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailFernSnapshotCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrija o timeout de DovetailCloudReconcilerService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve DovetailNimbusFormService, assess whether lost focus when the drawer animation finishes is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailKiteSchedulerFlow needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by Core Data; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailSpruceDaemonCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The next client release depends on a new DovetailCoralUploadService capability in projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, with Core Data already chosen by the platform group. Implement the endpoint and durable cursor, enforce tenant authorization and idempotency, emit useful spans, cap work per request, and include focused tests for retries, cancellation, and malformed cursors.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Core Data deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailCoralUploadService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: The data is already available in projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Parse DovetailHarborIndexStore's signed cursor","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up DovetailWrenExportCoordinator. First, find the unknown cause of out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, which follows Playwright conventions and currently suffers from out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing. Make rollback possible without deleting user data.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailSpruceDaemonService returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: Ticket OPS-44141: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged DovetailMicaProfileFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/dovetail/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nfinal class DovetailFlintTimelineFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about DovetailFlintTimelineFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailWillowCodecCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the DovetailIrisBatchService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailIrisBatchService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split DovetailJuniperCLIStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-44154\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailMarbleTokenCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for DovetailMarbleTokenCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailSlateEditorCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in DovetailEmberRelayService lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailTideWorkerCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex as the source of truth, preserve the Terraform contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: # projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py\n[worker.dovetailslateeditorflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailslateeditorflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailslateeditorflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailSlateEditorFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44117\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: Two asks around DovetailNovaPickerCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for DovetailNovaPickerCoordinator; (2) also add the visible loading and offline states. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/dovetail/packages/api/openapi.yaml hat DovetailBeaconStoreService ein sporadisches Problem im React 19-Ablauf. Lies den aktuellen Ablauf und bewerte Ownership, Abbruch und Reihenfolge; ich brauche nur die Analyse.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- React 19 weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf DovetailBeaconStoreService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um DovetailBeaconStoreService mit React 19 kompatibel.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"DovetailFrostPanelCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.22,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer DovetailCedarPolicyStore cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-44150\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailDriftConsoleCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise DovetailDriftConsoleCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for DovetailBeaconStoreCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate DovetailBeaconStoreCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/dovetail/config/staging.toml\n- platform constraint: React 19\n- known complication: a feature flag whose default differs between environments\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Make rollback possible without deleting user data; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: dovetailbasilrunnerflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs:217:18\n   4: dovetailbasilrunnerflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nFind the source of this DovetailBasilRunnerFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe DovetailJuniperCLIService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The DovetailEchoRegistryService empty state in projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: projects/dovetail/internal/auth/refresh.go now contains DovetailFlintTimelineStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailRainfallDBCoordinator: restructure, then document","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale DovetailOrbitSyncService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Redis Streams operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip DovetailNovaPickerStore's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: DovetailCoralUploadStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailCoralUploadStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailRavenSessionCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating two validators with subtly different error strings in DovetailCinderAuthStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip DovetailPrismCacheService's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailEchoRegistryCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating two validators with subtly different error strings in DovetailBirchMigratorService, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded DovetailBirchMigratorStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'DovetailSummitProxyCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[DovetailSummitProxyCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go:144: error: -[DovetailSummitProxyCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[DovetailSummitProxyCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring DovetailSummitProxyCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should DovetailQuartzPlayerService be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-44123: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailRainfallDBFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise DovetailRainfallDBFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: A flaky failure around DovetailAmberFilterStore survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailAmberFilterStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nA real symptom is present, so follow evidence to a cause rather than stopping at a walkthrough.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: Ticket OPS-44151: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailMapleQueueCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible DovetailMapleQueueCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for DovetailWrenExportStore, and the basic data flow in projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt already works. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Playwright deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailWrenExportStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Queue DovetailOpalRouterStore's expired sessions","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/dovetail/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.dovetailirisbatchcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailirisbatchcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailirisbatchcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailIrisBatchCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44158\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/dovetail/src/sync/reconcile.ts. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for DovetailIrisBatchFlow, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give DovetailEchoRegistryStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: // projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class DovetailCoralUploadFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate DovetailCoralUploadFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: DovetailQuartzPlayerStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailQuartzPlayerStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to DovetailDriftConsoleFlow rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, DovetailVelaDrawerService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Playwright. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Playwright\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a DovetailVelaDrawerService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con Playwright alrededor de DovetailVelaDrawerService.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Bring DovetailVelaDrawerStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended DovetailMapleQueueService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current React 19 operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract DovetailFrostPanelService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailMoonlitSDKCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: projects/dovetail/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt の DovetailLumenChartService で、Playwright の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- Playwright を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は DovetailLumenChartService のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"DovetailOspreyJobCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish DovetailOspreyJobCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/dovetail/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift as the source of truth, preserve the Core Data contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up DovetailOrbitSyncCoordinator. First, find the unknown cause of cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/dovetail/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, which follows Redis Streams conventions and currently suffers from cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary. Make rollback possible without deleting user data.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For DovetailHarborIndexCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/dovetail/lib/codec/frame.cc; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/dovetail/lib/codec/frame.cc, stay with Terraform, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: Incident timeline — INC-44144\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailBirchMigratorFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged DovetailBirchMigratorFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did DovetailOspreyJobStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For DovetailCloudReconcilerCoordinator, separate DovetailCloudReconcilerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py, stay with Core Data, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited DovetailFrostPanelStore and need a careful read of projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs before I can sign off on the next release. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing React 19 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailFrostPanelStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/dovetail/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and tell me whether DovetailWillowCodecService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-44131: retire the legacy replay path for DovetailNovaPickerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the DovetailNovaPickerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/dovetail/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.dovetailcloudreconcilerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailcloudreconcilerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailcloudreconcilerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailCloudReconcilerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44127\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign DovetailCloudReconcilerFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'DovetailLedgerGateFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[DovetailLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:144: error: -[DovetailLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[DovetailLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFind the source of this DovetailLedgerGateFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: Test Suite 'DovetailAmberFilterCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[DovetailAmberFilterCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:144: error: -[DovetailAmberFilterCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[DovetailAmberFilterCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible DovetailAmberFilterCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the DovetailRainfallDBService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: Test Suite 'DovetailVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[DovetailVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/dovetail/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:144: error: -[DovetailVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[DovetailVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Finish the visible DovetailVelaDrawerCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate DovetailEmberRelayStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Style DovetailCopperBridgeService's offline state","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged DovetailIrisBatchStore for a read-only pass because its Playwright boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Playwright operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around DovetailCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: (1) produce a consumer guide for DovetailCraneWorkspaceCoordinator; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The destination for DovetailKiteSchedulerService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/dovetail/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift to that target. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailKiteSchedulerService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/dovetail/ml/pipeline/features.py recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let DovetailMicaProfileService adopt React 19 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says DovetailAcornWidgetStore is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Terraform operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nA real symptom is present, so follow evidence to a cause rather than stopping at a walkthrough.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailNimbusFormCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: projects/dovetail/config/staging.toml の DovetailMapleQueueFlow で、React 19 の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- React 19 を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は DovetailMapleQueueFlow のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Move DovetailMapleQueueStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new DovetailAtlasSearchFlow adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: DovetailSummitProxyService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside DovetailSummitProxyService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThe relevant code crosses game tooling, data pipelines, macOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Diff: projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go 里的 DovetailDeltaCanvasService 最近在 Redis Streams 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请拆分职责并去掉重复，同时保持 API、wire value、顺序和可观察行为不变。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Redis Streams\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 DovetailDeltaCanvasService","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: projects/dovetail/infra/modules/edge/main.tf has grown through several launches, and DovetailOrbitSyncStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Redis Streams deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailOrbitSyncStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did DovetailAsterWebhookService's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare DovetailCraneWorkspaceService's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should DovetailNovaPickerService be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-44124: finish the compact DovetailHarborIndexFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/dovetail/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nFramework: Terraform\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete DovetailHarborIndexFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow pod=dovetailsprucedaemonflow-7cf8 request_id=44145 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=dovetailsprucedaemonflow request_id=44145 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Reconstruct the DovetailSpruceDaemonFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/dovetail/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the DovetailFernSnapshotService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: The name pendingAck means two different things across DovetailMarbleTokenFlow's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/dovetail/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/dovetail/crates/index/src/segment.rs and tell me whether DovetailGarnetModalService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map DovetailRainfallDBStore's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/dovetail/crates/index/src/segment.rs now contains DovetailBasilRunnerStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could DovetailMosaicGridStore show the active React 19 sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go b/projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go\n+++ b/projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate DovetailQuartzPlayerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailSableParserCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailCinderAuthCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-44130\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for DovetailOpalRouterFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could DovetailAsterWebhookStore migrate incrementally?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the DovetailCopperBridgeStore toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailLumenChartCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, DovetailSableParserStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: Split DovetailCedarPolicyService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: dovetailravensessionflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/dovetail/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:217:18\n   4: dovetailravensessionflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the DovetailRavenSessionFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract DovetailHarborIndexService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Repository: // projects/dovetail/config/staging.toml\nfinal class DovetailPineMetricsFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Wire DovetailPineMetricsFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale DovetailAtlasSearchService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Core Data operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this game tooling, data pipelines, macOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unifie les validateurs de DovetailCloudReconcilerStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"DovetailAsterWebhookCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for DovetailAsterWebhookCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/dovetail/crates/index/src/segment.rs as the source of truth, preserve the React 19 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailQuartzPlayerCoordinator is blocking the next release because a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish DovetailQuartzPlayerCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Redis Streams conventions in projects/dovetail/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue; make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailDeltaCanvasCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-44134\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the DovetailSableParserFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does DovetailSlateEditorService preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/dovetail/lib/codec/frame.cc\n[worker.dovetailacornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailacornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailacornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44114\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/dovetail/lib/codec/frame.cc and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailBasilRunnerCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailBirchMigratorCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve DovetailGarnetModalStore, assess whether lost focus when the drawer animation finishes is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about DovetailMosaicGridService, but the current prose in projects/dovetail/pkg/cache/lease.rs only describes the happy path. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing React 19 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailMosaicGridService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailLedgerGateCoordinator: polish, then correct","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate DovetailMicaProfileStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: diff --git a/projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Add the bounded DovetailMoonlitSDKFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: DovetailDriftConsoleService has one known configuration mistake in projects/dovetail/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, not an open-ended failure investigation. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Redis Streams deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailDriftConsoleService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For DovetailOpalRouterCoordinator, change DovetailOpalRouterCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/dovetail/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, stay with Redis Streams, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: projects/dovetail/lib/codec/frame.cc now contains DovetailMarbleTokenStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailGarnetModalCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: # projects/dovetail/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n[worker.dovetailcinderauthflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetailcinderauthflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetailcinderauthflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailCinderAuthFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44142\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign DovetailCinderAuthFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: Split DovetailOpalRouterService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat DovetailLedgerGateService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is DovetailOspreyJobFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: Incident timeline — INC-44157\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailAtlasSearchCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nReconstruct the DovetailAtlasSearchCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: # projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.dovetaildeltacanvasflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.dovetaildeltacanvasflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.dovetaildeltacanvasflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.DovetailDeltaCanvasFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-44135\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/dovetail/services/ledger/replay.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through DovetailCraneWorkspaceStore's reconcile.ts","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace DovetailAcornWidgetService's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: Incident timeline — INC-44110\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailOrbitSyncFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the DovetailOrbitSyncFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: // projects/dovetail/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class DovetailKiteSchedulerCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit DovetailKiteSchedulerCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the DovetailPineMetricsService migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Drop DovetailPineMetricsStore's unused import","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: Incident timeline — INC-44120\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailJuniperCLIFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged DovetailJuniperCLIFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the DovetailPrismCacheStore setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: Incident timeline — INC-44122\n\n08:02 deploy DovetailCedarPolicyFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the DovetailCedarPolicyFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether DovetailAtlasSearchStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/dovetail/cmd/exporter/main.py and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect DovetailAmberFilterService to outgrow its current Terraform arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Terraform deployment\n- keep the work scoped to DovetailAmberFilterService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans game tooling, data pipelines, macOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"DovetailEmberRelayCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ist DovetailLedgerGateStore sicher?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de EquinoxBasilRunnerService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"// projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py\nfinal class EquinoxDriftConsoleFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate EquinoxDriftConsoleFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45111: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxNimbusFormFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess EquinoxNimbusFormFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in EquinoxAcornWidgetStore lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up EquinoxCinderAuthCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/equinox/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/equinox/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, which follows PostgreSQL 17 conventions and currently suffers from timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-45115\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxCinderAuthFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current EquinoxCinderAuthFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: # projects/equinox/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n[worker.equinoxravensessionflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.equinoxravensessionflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.equinoxravensessionflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.EquinoxRavenSessionFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-45112\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/equinox/pkg/cache/lease.rs. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxCedarPolicyCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does EquinoxWrenExportStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxBeaconStoreCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: Incident timeline — INC-45119\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxBasilRunnerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise EquinoxBasilRunnerFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for EquinoxCinderAuthStore, and the basic data flow in projects/equinox/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex already works. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxCinderAuthStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around EquinoxMoonlitSDKService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxMoonlitSDKService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/equinox/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, o EquinoxCoralUploadStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de PostgreSQL 17. Separe responsabilidades e remova duplicação sem mudar API, wire values, ordem ou comportamento observável.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com PostgreSQL 17\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao EquinoxCoralUploadStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: EquinoxCraneWorkspaceService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxCraneWorkspaceService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: Two deliverables are holding up EquinoxRavenSessionCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs, which follows WebGPU conventions and currently suffers from an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxNovaPickerFlow has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, EquinoxSlateEditorService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45130: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the EquinoxAtlasSearchFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract EquinoxIrisBatchService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check EquinoxEmberRelayStore's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf now contains EquinoxPrismCacheFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: Ticket OPS-45144: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxPineMetricsFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for EquinoxPineMetricsFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin EquinoxDriftConsoleService's SQLite dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxFernSnapshotCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxEchoRegistryStore leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new EquinoxCedarPolicyService adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter EquinoxJuniperCLIFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × EquinoxJuniperCLIFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=45143 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=45143 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=45143 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=45143 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nDetermine why EquinoxJuniperCLIFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of EquinoxPrismCacheService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current NATS JetStream operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAcornWidgetCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxWillowCodecCoordinator: document, then correct","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: projects/equinox/services/ledger/replay.go の EquinoxCraneWorkspaceFlow で、NATS JetStream の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 consumer 向けに contract、error、retry、コピー可能な例を含む文書を書き、handler は変更しないでください。\n\n制約:\n- NATS JetStream を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は EquinoxCraneWorkspaceFlow のみ","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Goal: A flaky failure around EquinoxBirchMigratorStore survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxBirchMigratorStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: // projects/equinox/ml/pipeline/features.py\nfinal class EquinoxFlintTimelineFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Restructure EquinoxFlintTimelineFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxRainfallDBService's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing EquinoxSpruceDaemonService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxMapleQueueCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for EquinoxMapleQueueCoordinator, plus also add the visible loading and offline states. Use projects/equinox/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql as the source of truth, preserve the Tokio contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: // projects/equinox/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nfinal class EquinoxNovaPickerCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about EquinoxNovaPickerCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-45121\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxWillowCodecFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Find the source of this EquinoxWillowCodecFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve EquinoxBeaconStoreStore, assess whether lost focus when the drawer animation finishes is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxDriftConsoleCoordinator: correct, then document","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.27,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: // projects/equinox/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nfinal class EquinoxMapleQueueFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about EquinoxMapleQueueFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of EquinoxGarnetModalService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/equinox/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxSlateEditorCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'EquinoxTideWorkerCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[EquinoxTideWorkerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/equinox/pkg/cache/lease.rs:144: error: -[EquinoxTideWorkerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[EquinoxTideWorkerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible EquinoxTideWorkerCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document EquinoxCinderAuthService's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around EquinoxAmberFilterCoordinator: (1) finish EquinoxAmberFilterCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure EquinoxRainfallDBFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: Two engineers disagree about whether EquinoxHarborIndexStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxQuartzPlayerCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: // projects/equinox/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class EquinoxCraneWorkspaceCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit EquinoxCraneWorkspaceCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxPineMetricsCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document EquinoxMosaicGridStore's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename EquinoxSummitProxyStore's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxNimbusFormCoordinator is blocking the next release because out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish EquinoxNimbusFormCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing NATS JetStream conventions in projects/equinox/services/ledger/replay.go; preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAcornWidgetService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for EquinoxOpalRouterFlow across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the EquinoxBirchMigratorService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.equinoxlumenchartflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.equinoxlumenchartflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.equinoxlumenchartflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.EquinoxLumenChartFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-45116\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_45140'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_45140'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDetermine why EquinoxSlateEditorFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45136: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the EquinoxWrenExportFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set EquinoxMapleQueueStore's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: Ticket OPS-45128: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise EquinoxSummitProxyFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says EquinoxRavenSessionService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move EquinoxGarnetModalFlow's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged EquinoxLumenChartStore for a read-only pass because its NATS JetStream boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current NATS JetStream operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For EquinoxKiteSchedulerCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/equinox/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/equinox/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, stay with PostgreSQL 17, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The next client release depends on a new EquinoxGarnetModalStore capability in projects/equinox/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, with Tokio already chosen by the platform group. Wire the schema, repository, handler, and worker so duplicate deliveries return the original result and shutdown never acknowledges uncommitted work.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing Tokio deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxGarnetModalStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around EquinoxMosaicGridCoordinator: (1) produce a consumer guide for EquinoxMosaicGridCoordinator; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin EquinoxWillowCodecStore's NATS dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: // projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nfinal class EquinoxSableParserCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about EquinoxSableParserCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: The API work is done; what remains for EquinoxSableParserService is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxSableParserService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set EquinoxAmberFilterStore's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the EquinoxDeltaCanvasStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxDeltaCanvasStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/equinox/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n[worker.equinoxamberfilterflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.equinoxamberfilterflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.equinoxamberfilterflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.EquinoxAmberFilterFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-45132\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign EquinoxAmberFilterFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: EquinoxNovaPickerService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxNovaPickerService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/equinox/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue hat EquinoxNimbusFormService ein sporadisches Problem im NATS JetStream-Ablauf. Die Ursache ist klar: Ändere nur das Staging-Timeout von 15 auf 30 Sekunden und passe die Assertion an.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- NATS JetStream weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf EquinoxNimbusFormService begrenzen","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: The public surface of EquinoxFlintTimelineService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/equinox/ml/pipeline/features.py is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxFlintTimelineService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-45129: finish the compact EquinoxMosaicGridFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/equinox/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Use the UI evidence to complete EquinoxMosaicGridFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/equinox/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: equinoxgarnetmodalcoordinator::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/equinox/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:217:18\n   4: equinoxgarnetmodalcoordinator::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the EquinoxGarnetModalCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match EquinoxEchoRegistryService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring EquinoxFrostPanelService's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could EquinoxSlateEditorStore show the active PostgreSQL 17 sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why is EquinoxSummitProxyService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAtlasSearchStore leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of EquinoxMoonlitSDKStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nReturn the restructuring sequence and decision points, not the edits themselves.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45150: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxCloudReconcilerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for EquinoxCloudReconcilerCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple EquinoxMapleQueueService's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go b/projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go\n+++ b/projects/equinox/internal/auth/refresh.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate EquinoxPrismCacheCoordinator's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around EquinoxNovaPickerStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around EquinoxWrenExportService now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxLumenChartCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: Ticket OPS-45134: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise EquinoxBeaconStoreFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does EquinoxCedarPolicyStore propagate cancellation through the PostgreSQL 17 boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is EquinoxEmberRelayService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For EquinoxIrisBatchCoordinator, ship the idempotent EquinoxIrisBatchCoordinator replay endpoint; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/equinox/services/ledger/replay.go, stay with NATS JetStream, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind EquinoxRainfallDBStore's NATS JetStream choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit EquinoxSpruceDaemonFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split EquinoxWillowCodecService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current EquinoxMicaProfileStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside EquinoxMicaProfileStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nThis repository spans identity, Rust CLI, Vue; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxCoralUploadCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename EquinoxMicaProfileService's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unifie les validateurs de EquinoxMarbleTokenStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxOrbitSyncCoordinator needs a paired pass: find the unknown cause of lease renewal code copied across three workers, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py as the source of truth, preserve the SQLite contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across EquinoxLedgerGateService's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxBasilRunnerCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Skizziere die EquinoxBasilRunnerStore-Migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/equinox/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt into independently owned modules while EquinoxFrostPanelStore's public behavior remains frozen for the next release? Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: Ticket OPS-45153: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxOpalRouterCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Assess EquinoxOpalRouterCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxMicaProfileCoordinator is blocking the next release because lost focus when the drawer animation finishes. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: lay out a staged migration for EquinoxMicaProfileCoordinator, and consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use the existing Tokio conventions in projects/equinox/src/sync/reconcile.ts; preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move EquinoxBeaconStoreService from the legacy store to Tokio. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/equinox/config/staging.toml\nfinal class EquinoxMarbleTokenFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit EquinoxMarbleTokenFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: A copied hex color in EquinoxOspreyJobFlow lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-45114\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxMicaProfileFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nReconstruct the EquinoxMicaProfileFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: A copied hex color in EquinoxSableParserStore lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'EquinoxQuartzPlayerFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[EquinoxQuartzPlayerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift:144: error: -[EquinoxQuartzPlayerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[EquinoxQuartzPlayerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete EquinoxQuartzPlayerFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxWrenExportCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45135: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxCoralUploadFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess EquinoxCoralUploadFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the EquinoxSpruceDaemonStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: diff --git a/projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml b/projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n+++ b/projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Read the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is EquinoxAcornWidgetFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxFrostPanelCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxQuartzPlayerService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: projects/equinox/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql now contains EquinoxPineMetricsStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs has grown through several launches, and EquinoxTideWorkerService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxTideWorkerService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does EquinoxPrismCacheStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell EquinoxKiteSchedulerStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxJuniperCLICoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_45148'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_45148'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nAdd the bounded EquinoxCopperBridgeFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded EquinoxCloudReconcilerStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, EquinoxOspreyJobService has shown timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxOspreyJobService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a EquinoxCopperBridgeStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py, EquinoxOpalRouterService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de SQLite. Termina el layout responsive, estados vacío y retry, foco por teclado, dark mode y reduced motion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con SQLite\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a EquinoxOpalRouterService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Give EquinoxOspreyJobStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The next client release depends on a new EquinoxRavenSessionStore capability in projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs, with WebGPU already chosen by the platform group. Wire the schema, repository, handler, and worker so duplicate deliveries return the original result and shutdown never acknowledges uncommitted work.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxRavenSessionStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/equinox/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'EquinoxEmberRelayFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[EquinoxEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/equinox/lib/codec/frame.cc:144: error: -[EquinoxEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[EquinoxEmberRelayFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete EquinoxEmberRelayFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: Test Suite 'EquinoxEchoRegistryFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[EquinoxEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs:144: error: -[EquinoxEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[EquinoxEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible EquinoxEchoRegistryFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design the EquinoxOrbitSyncService rollback","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxEmberRelayCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/equinox/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.equinoxfernsnapshotflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.equinoxfernsnapshotflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.equinoxfernsnapshotflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.EquinoxFernSnapshotFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-45141\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign EquinoxFernSnapshotFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind EquinoxDeltaCanvasFlow's SQLite choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip EquinoxLumenChartService's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of EquinoxFlintTimelineStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nReturn the restructuring sequence and decision points, not the edits themselves.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded EquinoxLedgerGateStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the EquinoxVelaDrawerService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does EquinoxFernSnapshotService propagate cancellation through the NATS JetStream boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the EquinoxIrisBatchStore wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect EquinoxDeltaCanvasService to outgrow its current SQLite arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing SQLite deployment\n- keep the work scoped to EquinoxDeltaCanvasService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this identity, Rust CLI, Vue monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: # projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.equinoxledgergateflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.equinoxledgergateflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.equinoxledgergateflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.EquinoxLedgerGateFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-45142\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/equinox/crates/index/src/segment.rs. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: We need to move EquinoxTideWorkerStore from the legacy store to WebGPU. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for EquinoxOrbitSyncStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-45149\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxAsterWebhookFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise EquinoxAsterWebhookFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxMarbleTokenCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for EquinoxMarbleTokenCoordinator, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/equinox/packages/api/openapi.yaml as the source of truth, preserve the WebGPU contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: Incident timeline — INC-45155\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxOspreyJobCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged EquinoxOspreyJobCoordinator migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Wire a EquinoxOpalRouterStore background task in projects/equinox/ml/pipeline/features.py that expires abandoned sessions, records an OpenTelemetry span, and yields cleanly when shutdown begins.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/equinox/lib/codec/frame.cc and tell me whether EquinoxCloudReconcilerFlow can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAtlasSearchCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate EquinoxAtlasSearchCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/equinox/lib/codec/frame.cc as the source of truth, preserve the PostgreSQL 17 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: Incident timeline — INC-45133\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxOrbitSyncFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the EquinoxOrbitSyncFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxRainfallDBCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py の EquinoxJuniperCLIService で、SQLite の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 原因は判明済みです。staging timeout だけを 15 秒から 30 秒へ変え、対応する assertion を直してください。\n\n制約:\n- SQLite を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は EquinoxJuniperCLIService のみ","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-45139: finish the compact EquinoxFrostPanelFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/equinox/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring EquinoxFrostPanelFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For EquinoxSummitProxyCoordinator, separate EquinoxSummitProxyCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, stay with SQLite, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxHarborIndexCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/equinox/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is EquinoxDeltaCanvasCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAsterWebhookCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/equinox/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class EquinoxIrisBatchFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure EquinoxIrisBatchFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should EquinoxAtlasSearchService be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for EquinoxMoonlitSDKCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: lay out a staged migration for EquinoxMoonlitSDKCoordinator\n- companion outcome: then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler\n- repository entry point: projects/equinox/lib/codec/frame.cc\n- platform constraint: PostgreSQL 17\n- known complication: a deadlock that appears only during shutdown\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for EquinoxFlintTimelineCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/equinox/cmd/exporter/main.py\n- platform constraint: SQLite\n- known complication: a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxBirchMigratorCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxCopperBridgeCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, EquinoxQuartzPlayerStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to EquinoxPineMetricsService rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind EquinoxTideWorkerFlow's WebGPU choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxSpruceDaemonCoordinator: document, then correct","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45117: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxBirchMigratorFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess EquinoxBirchMigratorFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxEchoRegistryCoordinator: sequence, then ship","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/equinox/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate EquinoxVelaDrawerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of EquinoxCloudReconcilerService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/equinox/lib/codec/frame.cc. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses identity, Rust CLI, Vue. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-45110: retire the legacy replay path for EquinoxMoonlitSDKFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise EquinoxMoonlitSDKFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new EquinoxAsterWebhookStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/equinox/services/ledger/replay.go, EquinoxNimbusFormStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de NATS JetStream. Propón fases, compatibilidad, métricas, rollback y ownership; detente antes de tocar código.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con NATS JetStream\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a EquinoxNimbusFormStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con NATS JetStream alrededor de EquinoxNimbusFormStore.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the EquinoxVelaDrawerStore migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring EquinoxCraneWorkspaceStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxAsterWebhookService returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/equinox/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The EquinoxCopperBridgeService feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence EquinoxMosaicGridService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-45147\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxHarborIndexFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for EquinoxHarborIndexFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EquinoxLedgerGateCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip EquinoxAmberFilterService's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Make EquinoxDriftConsoleStore keyboard navigable","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/equinox/ml/pipeline/features.py 里的 EquinoxJuniperCLIStore 最近在 SQLite 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请实现幂等 endpoint，包含持久 cursor、tenant 鉴权、spans 和 retry 测试。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 SQLite\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 EquinoxJuniperCLIStore","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de EquinoxMarbleTokenService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Opal: projects/equinox/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx 里的 EquinoxCoralUploadService 最近在 PostgreSQL 17 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请阅读现有流程，判断 ownership、取消和顺序是否安全，只需要分析。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 PostgreSQL 17\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 EquinoxCoralUploadService","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Remove EquinoxKiteSchedulerService's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around EquinoxVelaDrawerCoordinator: (1) separate EquinoxVelaDrawerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: The EquinoxHarborIndexService surface in projects/equinox/config/staging.toml is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: // projects/equinox/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nfinal class EquinoxKiteSchedulerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nDeliver the EquinoxKiteSchedulerFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: Incident timeline — INC-45145\n\n08:02 deploy EquinoxCedarPolicyFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Map a safe route from the current EquinoxCedarPolicyFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"How does EquinoxSableParserFlow propagate cancellation through the WebGPU boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited FoxglovePineMetricsStore and need a careful read of projects/foxglove/services/ledger/replay.go before I can sign off on the next release. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxglovePineMetricsStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveLumenChartStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/foxglove/cmd/exporter/main.py and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveNimbusFormCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around FoxgloveSableParserCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/foxglove/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Cover the awkward empty and retry states, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does FoxgloveHarborIndexStore own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: Two deliverables are holding up FoxgloveFernSnapshotCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, which follows Cloudflare Workers conventions and currently suffers from an accessibility label that reads the internal enum. Cover the awkward empty and retry states.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx の FoxgloveSummitProxyFlow で、GraphQL の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- GraphQL を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は FoxgloveSummitProxyFlow のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a FoxgloveKiteSchedulerService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For FoxgloveGarnetModalCoordinator, change FoxgloveGarnetModalCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go, stay with Kafka, and cover the awkward empty and retry states. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46118\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveCedarPolicyFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged FoxgloveCedarPolicyFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveAcornWidgetCoordinator is blocking the next release because an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change FoxgloveAcornWidgetCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Spring Boot conventions in projects/foxglove/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql; cover the awkward empty and retry states. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_46157'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_46157'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDeliver the FoxgloveBeaconStoreCoordinator server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin FoxgloveAsterWebhookService's Kafka dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Ticket OPS-46155: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveAmberFilterCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible FoxgloveAmberFilterCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split FoxgloveCedarPolicyStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveBasilRunnerCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring FoxgloveMapleQueueStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: Two deliverables are holding up FoxgloveQuartzPlayerCoordinator. First, separate FoxgloveQuartzPlayerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, which follows GraphQL conventions and currently suffers from a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting. Cover the awkward empty and retry states.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveBirchMigratorCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'FoxglovePrismCacheFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[FoxglovePrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/foxglove/cmd/exporter/main.py:144: error: -[FoxglovePrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[FoxglovePrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Bring FoxglovePrismCacheFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Willow: The first FoxgloveAtlasSearchFlow request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveVelaDrawerCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: Ticket OPS-46141: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveSpruceDaemonFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current FoxgloveSpruceDaemonFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended FoxgloveAmberFilterService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveHarborIndexCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: The API work is done; what remains for FoxgloveAcornWidgetStore is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveAcornWidgetStore\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: Two asks around FoxgloveMoonlitSDKCoordinator: (1) finish FoxgloveMoonlitSDKCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Cover the awkward empty and retry states, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around FoxgloveOrbitSyncFlow now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveRainfallDBCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: Incident timeline — INC-46130\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged FoxgloveSableParserFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For FoxglovePrismCacheCoordinator, finish FoxglovePrismCacheCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py, stay with Cloudflare Workers, and cover the awkward empty and retry states. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does FoxgloveCoralUploadFlow enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/foxglove/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nfinal class FoxgloveCinderAuthFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit FoxgloveCinderAuthFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveBeaconStoreFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/foxglove/services/ledger/replay.go and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: Incident timeline — INC-46150\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveMarbleTokenCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the FoxgloveMarbleTokenCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does FoxgloveBeaconStoreStore's Kafka worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: Incident timeline — INC-46124\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveCraneWorkspaceFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise FoxgloveCraneWorkspaceFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract FoxgloveFernSnapshotService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in FoxgloveWrenExportFlow lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for FoxgloveLedgerGateCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: produce a consumer guide for FoxgloveLedgerGateCoordinator\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n- platform constraint: Spring Boot\n- known complication: lease renewal code copied across three workers\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Cover the awkward empty and retry states; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell FoxgloveGarnetModalStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveDriftConsoleCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveTideWorkerCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for FoxgloveTideWorkerCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt as the source of truth, preserve the Spring Boot contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The FoxgloveMicaProfileStore surface in projects/foxglove/services/ledger/replay.go is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does FoxgloveVelaDrawerStore's Cloudflare Workers worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n[worker.foxglovecopperbridgeflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxglovecopperbridgeflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxglovecopperbridgeflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveCopperBridgeFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46121\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. The intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"We need to move FoxgloveFlintTimelineStore from the legacy store to GraphQL. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveCloudReconcilerCoordinator: polish, then correct","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give FoxgloveAsterWebhookStore a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a FoxgloveBirchMigratorStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move FoxgloveMarbleTokenStore from the legacy store to Spring Boot. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let FoxgloveSpruceDaemonStore adopt GraphQL with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind FoxgloveBirchMigratorService's Spring Boot choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the FoxgloveFrostPanelService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveFrostPanelService\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx has grown through several launches, and FoxgloveSummitProxyService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing GraphQL deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveSummitProxyService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go b/projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is FoxgloveBasilRunnerFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: // projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml\nfinal class FoxgloveAtlasSearchCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Walk through what the artifact proves about FoxgloveAtlasSearchCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveSpruceDaemonCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-46137: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. From this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for FoxgloveMicaProfileFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: // projects/foxglove/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nfinal class FoxgloveFrostPanelFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure FoxgloveFrostPanelFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveLumenChartCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current FoxgloveJuniperCLIStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveJuniperCLIStore\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveEmberRelayCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46152\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveMosaicGridCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for FoxgloveMosaicGridCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Style FoxgloveLedgerGateService's offline state","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveDeltaCanvasCoordinator needs a paired pass: ship the idempotent FoxgloveDeltaCanvasCoordinator replay endpoint, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx as the source of truth, preserve the GraphQL contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Serve FoxglovePrismCacheService health checks","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-46122: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveAsterWebhookFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess FoxgloveAsterWebhookFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: projects/foxglove/infra/modules/edge/main.tf now contains FoxgloveBasilRunnerStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveFlintTimelineCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new FoxgloveAmberFilterStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, FoxgloveSlateEditorService has shown a feature flag whose default differs between environments; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Kotlin coroutines deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveSlateEditorService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt 里的 FoxgloveRavenSessionService 最近在 Spring Boot 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请写一份面向调用方的说明，包含 contract、错误、retry 和可复制示例，不要改 handler。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Spring Boot\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 FoxgloveRavenSessionService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveAsterWebhookCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Diff: projects/foxglove/services/ledger/replay.go has grown through several launches, and FoxgloveBeaconStoreService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveBeaconStoreService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve FoxgloveCinderAuthStore, assess whether two validators with subtly different error strings is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The FoxgloveAmberFilterFlow surface in projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveCedarPolicyCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: The FoxgloveLumenChartService empty state in projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating an accessibility label that reads the internal enum in FoxgloveMosaicGridStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does FoxgloveCloudReconcilerService preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract FoxgloveOspreyJobStore's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveAtlasSearchStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class FoxgloveFlintTimelineFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure FoxgloveFlintTimelineFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for FoxgloveDriftConsoleService events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveSlateEditorCoordinator is blocking the next release because timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/foxglove/packages/api/openapi.yaml, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Kotlin coroutines conventions in projects/foxglove/packages/api/openapi.yaml; cover the awkward empty and retry states. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveCopperBridgeCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Make FoxgloveJuniperCLIService keyboard navigable","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: # projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.foxglovewrenexportcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxglovewrenexportcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxglovewrenexportcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveWrenExportCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46159\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveCinderAuthCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxglovePineMetricsCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give FoxgloveEchoRegistryStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple FoxgloveDeltaCanvasService's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the FoxgloveCopperBridgeService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of FoxgloveLedgerGateStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe FoxgloveOpalRouterService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class FoxgloveJuniperCLIFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate FoxgloveJuniperCLIFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: Ticket OPS-46131: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveDeltaCanvasFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess FoxgloveDeltaCanvasFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Por que FoxgloveNovaPickerService trava?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveKiteSchedulerCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Store FoxgloveCloudReconcilerStore's delivery receipts","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveRavenSessionCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Repository: // projects/foxglove/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nfinal class FoxgloveGarnetModalFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit FoxgloveGarnetModalFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a FoxgloveMosaicGridFlow changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: # projects/foxglove/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.foxgloveacornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxgloveacornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxgloveacornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46110\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign FoxgloveAcornWidgetFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/foxglove/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, FoxgloveQuartzPlayerStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de GraphQL. Propón fases, compatibilidad, métricas, rollback y ownership; detente antes de tocar código.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con GraphQL\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a FoxgloveQuartzPlayerStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con GraphQL alrededor de FoxgloveQuartzPlayerStore.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: Ticket OPS-46135: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveRavenSessionFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current FoxgloveRavenSessionFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: The name pendingAck means two different things across FoxgloveNimbusFormService's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For FoxgloveOpalRouterCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp, stay with GraphQL, and cover the awkward empty and retry states. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveEchoRegistryCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new FoxgloveVelaDrawerService adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and tell me whether FoxgloveWillowCodecService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could FoxgloveMarbleTokenFlow show the active Spring Boot sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, FoxgloveCoralUploadStore has shown a misleading timeout name used in five packages; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Kotlin coroutines deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveCoralUploadStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the FoxgloveTideWorkerStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell FoxgloveCraneWorkspaceStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-46123: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the FoxgloveCloudReconcilerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveJuniperCLICoordinator: ship, then document","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around FoxgloveNovaPickerCoordinator: (1) change FoxgloveNovaPickerCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Cover the awkward empty and retry states, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveKiteSchedulerStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/foxglove/pkg/cache/lease.rs value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace FoxgloveHarborIndexService's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current FoxgloveWrenExportService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveWrenExportService\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around FoxgloveCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of a deadlock that appears only during shutdown; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Cover the awkward empty and retry states, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-46154: finish the compact FoxgloveIrisBatchCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/foxglove/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nFramework: Cloudflare Workers\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible FoxgloveIrisBatchCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: // projects/foxglove/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nfinal class FoxgloveFernSnapshotFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nAdd the bounded FoxgloveFernSnapshotFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py b/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is FoxgloveLumenChartFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46126\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current FoxgloveOpalRouterFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/foxglove/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split FoxgloveOspreyJobService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveMapleQueueCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: # projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n[worker.foxgloveechoregistryflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxgloveechoregistryflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxgloveechoregistryflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveEchoRegistryFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46145\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 The intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing FoxglovePineMetricsService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does FoxglovePrismCacheStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: FoxgloveAcornWidgetService has one known configuration mistake in projects/foxglove/src/sync/reconcile.ts, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveAcornWidgetService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class FoxgloveWillowCodecFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about FoxgloveWillowCodecFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for FoxgloveFrostPanelCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change FoxgloveFrostPanelCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go\n- platform constraint: Kafka\n- known complication: lost focus when the drawer animation finishes\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Cover the awkward empty and retry states; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.4,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-46143: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveEmberRelayFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible FoxgloveEmberRelayFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py b/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/ml/pipeline/features.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate FoxgloveRainfallDBFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a FoxgloveNimbusFormStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveMicaProfileCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give FoxgloveMapleQueueService's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Warum hängt FoxgloveRainfallDBStore?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Lately: // projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class FoxgloveOrbitSyncCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit FoxgloveOrbitSyncCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: diff --git a/projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt b/projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure FoxgloveLedgerGateFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map FoxgloveCopperBridgeStore's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe FoxgloveCedarPolicyService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, FoxgloveIrisBatchFlow's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported GraphQL version in projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46134\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for FoxgloveNimbusFormFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design the FoxgloveGarnetModalService rollback","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de FoxgloveNovaPickerStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Move FoxgloveSpruceDaemonService's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Store FoxgloveTideWorkerService's delivery receipts","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin FoxgloveSableParserService's Spring dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/foxglove/packages/api/openapi.yaml の FoxgloveEmberRelayService で、Kotlin coroutines の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- Kotlin coroutines を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は FoxgloveEmberRelayService のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: FoxgloveSlateEditorStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveSlateEditorStore\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe cause and exact value change are already known, so keep this as a contained correction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-46128: finish the compact FoxgloveOspreyJobFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/foxglove/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nFramework: Kotlin coroutines\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete FoxgloveOspreyJobFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does FoxgloveSummitProxyStore's GraphQL worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'FoxgloveVelaDrawerFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[FoxgloveVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/foxglove/cmd/exporter/main.py:144: error: -[FoxgloveVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[FoxgloveVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete FoxgloveVelaDrawerFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: diff --git a/projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex b/projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit FoxgloveQuartzPlayerFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: // projects/foxglove/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nfinal class FoxgloveBirchMigratorFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate FoxgloveBirchMigratorFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveOspreyJobCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for FoxgloveOspreyJobCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/foxglove/pkg/cache/lease.rs as the source of truth, preserve the Kotlin coroutines contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: # projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.foxglovesummitproxycoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxglovesummitproxycoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxglovesummitproxycoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveSummitProxyCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46151\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml 里的 FoxgloveEmberRelayStore 最近在 Kotlin coroutines 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请给出阶段、兼容层、指标、rollback 和 ownership，先不要修改代码。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Kotlin coroutines\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 FoxgloveEmberRelayStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveMosaicGridService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: diff --git a/projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml b/projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml\n+++ b/projects/foxglove/config/staging.toml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure FoxgloveMoonlitSDKFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: Incident timeline — INC-46120\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveHarborIndexFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFind the source of this FoxgloveHarborIndexFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: The public surface of FoxgloveMarbleTokenService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/foxglove/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveMarbleTokenService\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: The public surface of FoxgloveOrbitSyncService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/foxglove/lib/codec/frame.cc is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside FoxgloveOrbitSyncService\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n\nSeveral teams work in this observability, SwiftUI, Redis monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: # projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n[worker.foxglovetideworkerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.foxglovetideworkerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.foxglovetideworkerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.FoxgloveTideWorkerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-46125\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign FoxgloveTideWorkerFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: // projects/foxglove/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class FoxglovePineMetricsFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about FoxglovePineMetricsFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveWillowCodecCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: Incident timeline — INC-46146\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveDriftConsoleFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible FoxgloveDriftConsoleFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: Incident timeline — INC-46113\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveSlateEditorFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Reconstruct the FoxgloveSlateEditorFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: Incident timeline — INC-46148\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveKiteSchedulerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nDetermine why FoxgloveKiteSchedulerFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46158\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveCoralUploadCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for FoxgloveCoralUploadCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split FoxgloveOpalRouterStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design the FoxgloveSableParserStore rollback","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: projects/foxglove/pkg/cache/lease.rs now contains FoxgloveCinderAuthService's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the FoxgloveDeltaCanvasStore toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveCoralUploadService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Kotlin coroutines operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported Kafka version in projects/foxglove/internal/auth/refresh.go is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: The FoxgloveEchoRegistryService surface in projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/foxglove/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, o FoxgloveRavenSessionStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Spring Boot. Leia o fluxo atual e avalie ownership, cancelamento e ordem; preciso apenas da análise.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Spring Boot\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao FoxgloveRavenSessionStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in FoxgloveMicaProfileService lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/foxglove/packages/api/openapi.yaml, FoxgloveAtlasSearchService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Kotlin coroutines. Lee el flujo actual y dime si ownership, cancelación y orden son seguros; solo necesito el análisis.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Kotlin coroutines\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a FoxgloveAtlasSearchService","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Any races in FoxgloveMoonlitSDKService?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of FoxgloveWrenExportStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Cloudflare Workers operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/foxglove/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex hat FoxgloveQuartzPlayerService ein sporadisches Problem im GraphQL-Ablauf. Lies den aktuellen Ablauf und bewerte Ownership, Abbruch und Reihenfolge; ich brauche nur die Analyse.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- GraphQL weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf FoxgloveQuartzPlayerService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um FoxgloveQuartzPlayerService mit GraphQL kompatibel.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/foxglove/engine/render/atlas.cpp and tell me whether FoxgloveOrbitSyncStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify FoxgloveMoonlitSDKStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FoxgloveFrostPanelStore needs a production server path for replaying tenant events; the public envelope is agreed but persistence and retry handling are not wired. Implement the endpoint and durable cursor, enforce tenant authorization and idempotency, emit useful spans, cap work per request, and include focused tests for retries, cancellation, and malformed cursors.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans observability, SwiftUI, Redis; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-46147: retire the legacy replay path for FoxgloveMapleQueueFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the FoxgloveMapleQueueFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de FoxgloveRainfallDBService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Make FoxgloveCraneWorkspaceService keyboard navigable","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about FoxgloveFernSnapshotStore, but the current prose in projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Cloudflare Workers deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveFernSnapshotStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: FoxgloveIrisBatchService has one known configuration mistake in projects/foxglove/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover the awkward empty and retry states\n- stay compatible with the existing Cloudflare Workers deployment\n- keep the work scoped to FoxgloveIrisBatchService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses observability, SwiftUI, Redis. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The FoxgloveWillowCodecStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-46127\n\n08:02 deploy FoxgloveNovaPickerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nDetermine why FoxgloveNovaPickerFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: Incident timeline — INC-47119\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerDriftConsoleFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the GossamerDriftConsoleFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-47132: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise GossamerWrenExportFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up GossamerBirchMigratorCoordinator. First, lay out a staged migration for GossamerBirchMigratorCoordinator. In the same workstream, also add the visible loading and offline states. The relevant starting point is projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, which follows Room conventions and currently suffers from lease renewal code copied across three workers. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move GossamerEmberRelayService behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing GossamerBeaconStoreStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerOspreyJobService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current OpenTelemetry operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerAsterWebhookCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, GossamerRainfallDBService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring GossamerAsterWebhookStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class GossamerMarbleTokenFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure GossamerMarbleTokenFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and tell me whether GossamerPineMetricsStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerQuartzPlayerService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: Ticket OPS-47154: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerDeltaCanvasCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess GossamerDeltaCanvasCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/gossamer/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class GossamerSableParserCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Restructure GossamerSableParserCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: projects/gossamer/cmd/exporter/main.py 里的 GossamerFrostPanelService 最近在 gRPC 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请阅读现有流程，判断 ownership、取消和顺序是否安全，只需要分析。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 gRPC\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 GossamerFrostPanelService","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"GossamerMarbleTokenCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: # projects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.gossamernovapickercoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamernovapickercoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamernovapickercoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerNovaPickerCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47150\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: Incident timeline — INC-47129\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerOrbitSyncFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Turn the material above into a concise GossamerOrbitSyncFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Delta: // projects/gossamer/cmd/exporter/main.py\nfinal class GossamerBasilRunnerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate GossamerBasilRunnerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerPrismCacheFlow needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by Swift 6; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerSlateEditorService occasionally exhibits duplicate retries after a network handoff, but only after a reconnect. Follow the data and cancellation paths in projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts and identify the cause before changing anything.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could GossamerDeltaCanvasFlow show the active FastAPI sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does GossamerCloudReconcilerService enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'GossamerBeaconStoreFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[GossamerBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift:144: error: -[GossamerBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[GossamerBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nReconstruct the GossamerBeaconStoreFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does GossamerLedgerGateStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft GossamerBeaconStoreService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: The data is already available in projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current GossamerGarnetModalService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerGarnetModalService\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could GossamerLedgerGateService show the active Room sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: projects/gossamer/services/ledger/replay.go 里的 GossamerHarborIndexStore 最近在 Room 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请给出阶段、兼容层、指标、rollback 和 ownership，先不要修改代码。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Room\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 GossamerHarborIndexStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-47139\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerJuniperCLIFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for GossamerJuniperCLIFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: Ticket OPS-47124: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess GossamerSummitProxyFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does GossamerCraneWorkspaceStore propagate cancellation through the Swift 6 boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, GossamerCloudReconcilerStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter GossamerIrisBatchFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × GossamerIrisBatchFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=47127 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=47127 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=47127 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=47127 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the GossamerIrisBatchFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerLedgerGateCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue: remove the obsolete GossamerSableParserFlow import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For GossamerSummitProxyCoordinator, separate GossamerSummitProxyCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs, stay with FastAPI, and keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: # projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.gossameramberfilterflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossameramberfilterflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossameramberfilterflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerAmberFilterFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47128\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The next client release depends on a new GossamerNovaPickerService capability in projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, with gRPC already chosen by the platform group. Implement the endpoint and durable cursor, enforce tenant authorization and idempotency, emit useful spans, cap work per request, and include focused tests for retries, cancellation, and malformed cursors.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerNovaPickerService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a deadlock that appears only during shutdown in GossamerRainfallDBStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: The first GossamerSableParserStore request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current GossamerBasilRunnerStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerBasilRunnerStore\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nReturn an assessment of the existing artifact; only quote enough to make the walkthrough understandable.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the GossamerCoralUploadService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the GossamerAmberFilterService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: Could GossamerTideWorkerStore show the active Room sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: // projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class GossamerHarborIndexFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nAdd the bounded GossamerHarborIndexFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: // projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nfinal class GossamerFernSnapshotFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Split GossamerFernSnapshotFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_47121'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_47121'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Wire GossamerKiteSchedulerFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"GossamerRavenSessionFlow's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerWillowCodecCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerCopperBridgeCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerJuniperCLICoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The destination for GossamerRavenSessionService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go to that target. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerRavenSessionService\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Centre la modale GossamerDriftConsoleService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is GossamerMapleQueueFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: # projects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.gossamermicaprofileflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamermicaprofileflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamermicaprofileflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerMicaProfileFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47110\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/gossamer/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vereinheitliche die GossamerDriftConsoleStore-Validatoren","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Translate the GossamerSummitProxyService setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit GossamerPineMetricsFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the GossamerWrenExportService setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/gossamer/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n[worker.gossamercraneworkspaceflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamercraneworkspaceflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamercraneworkspaceflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerCraneWorkspaceFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47147\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/gossamer/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerBasilRunnerCoordinator is blocking the next release because a query plan that changes after statistics refresh. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish GossamerBasilRunnerCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing gRPC conventions in projects/gossamer/ml/pipeline/features.py; keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for GossamerDeltaCanvasStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For GossamerBeaconStoreCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for GossamerBeaconStoreCoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, stay with gRPC, and keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give GossamerOrbitSyncStore a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let GossamerNimbusFormFlow adopt Swift 6 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether GossamerAsterWebhookService's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/gossamer/ml/pipeline/features.py and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: GossamerLumenChartService has one known configuration mistake in projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc, not an open-ended failure investigation. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerLumenChartService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended GossamerBirchMigratorService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current Room operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/gossamer/cmd/exporter/main.py\n[worker.gossamerfrostpanelflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamerfrostpanelflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamerfrostpanelflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerFrostPanelFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47135\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/gossamer/cmd/exporter/main.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for GossamerSpruceDaemonCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: produce a consumer guide for GossamerSpruceDaemonCoordinator\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/gossamer/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n- platform constraint: FastAPI\n- known complication: duplicate retries after a network handoff\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerVelaDrawerCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerCedarPolicyCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerRainfallDBCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, GossamerSableParserService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Room. Termina el layout responsive, estados vacío y retry, foco por teclado, dark mode y reduced motion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Room\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a GossamerSableParserService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Why does GossamerCedarPolicyStore's OpenTelemetry worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace GossamerMosaicGridStore's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current GossamerPrismCacheService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerPrismCacheService\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-47146: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the GossamerCloudReconcilerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerMapleQueueCoordinator: ship, then correct","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerFrostPanelCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-47145: finish the compact GossamerAsterWebhookFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/gossamer/ml/pipeline/features.py\nFramework: gRPC\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Use the UI evidence to complete GossamerAsterWebhookFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerOrbitSyncCoordinator needs a paired pass: change GossamerOrbitSyncCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/gossamer/config/staging.toml as the source of truth, preserve the FastAPI contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.29,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerAcornWidgetStore's FilterDrawer.vue needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerEmberRelayCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the GossamerWrenExportStore validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: # projects/gossamer/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.gossamerrainfalldbflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamerrainfalldbflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamerrainfalldbflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerRainfallDBFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47142\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign GossamerRainfallDBFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the GossamerMarbleTokenService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: diff --git a/projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure GossamerMoonlitSDKCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/gossamer/packages/api/openapi.yaml into independently owned modules while GossamerFlintTimelineFlow's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify GossamerAtlasSearchService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale GossamerSpruceDaemonStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current FastAPI operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: // projects/gossamer/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class GossamerBirchMigratorFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Split GossamerBirchMigratorFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Production says GossamerNimbusFormService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move GossamerVelaDrawerStore behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could GossamerNovaPickerStore show the active gRPC sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged GossamerWillowCodecStore for a read-only pass because its Swift 6 boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nReturn an assessment of the existing artifact; only quote enough to make the walkthrough understandable.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: What is the safest way to split projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex into independently owned modules while GossamerFernSnapshotService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about GossamerBirchMigratorStore, but the current prose in projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue only describes the happy path. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerBirchMigratorStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nProduce durable prose rather than a code assessment or implementation change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-47131: finish the compact GossamerCoralUploadFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/gossamer/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nFramework: OpenTelemetry\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring GossamerCoralUploadFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove GossamerBasilRunnerService's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The first GossamerCraneWorkspaceService request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: projects/gossamer/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt の GossamerOspreyJobFlow で、OpenTelemetry の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 consumer 向けに contract、error、retry、コピー可能な例を含む文書を書き、handler は変更しないでください。\n\n制約:\n- OpenTelemetry を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は GossamerOspreyJobFlow のみ","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-47122: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerVelaDrawerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the GossamerVelaDrawerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the GossamerAtlasSearchStore changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerWrenExportCoordinator needs a paired pass: change GossamerWrenExportCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/gossamer/engine/render/atlas.cpp as the source of truth, preserve the Swift 6 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-47125\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerMosaicGridFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current GossamerMosaicGridFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether GossamerOpalRouterStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/gossamer/config/staging.toml and settle that question from the code. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerHarborIndexCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to GossamerPrismCacheStore rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does GossamerGarnetModalStore's gRPC worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple GossamerMapleQueueStore's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell GossamerWillowCodecService's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe GossamerAcornWidgetService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go and tell me whether GossamerTideWorkerService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerDriftConsoleCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerAtlasSearchCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish GossamerAtlasSearchCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts as the source of truth, preserve the OpenTelemetry contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/gossamer/ml/pipeline/features.py, o GossamerFrostPanelStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de gRPC. Finalize o layout responsivo, estados vazio e retry, foco por teclado, dark mode e reduced motion.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com gRPC\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao GossamerFrostPanelStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue の GossamerHarborIndexService で、Room の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 原因は判明済みです。staging timeout だけを 15 秒から 30 秒へ変え、対応する assertion を直してください。\n\n制約:\n- Room を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は GossamerHarborIndexService のみ","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"projects/gossamer/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql has grown through several launches, and GossamerMoonlitSDKService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing OpenTelemetry deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerMoonlitSDKService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerEchoRegistryStore crashes after reconnect","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit GossamerPrismCacheCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring GossamerCedarPolicyService's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerFernSnapshotStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/gossamer/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: Ticket OPS-47116: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerEmberRelayFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current GossamerEmberRelayFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-47155\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerGarnetModalCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current GossamerGarnetModalCoordinator behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: Ticket OPS-47126: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged GossamerAtlasSearchFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerPineMetricsCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft GossamerVelaDrawerService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For GossamerAcornWidgetCoordinator, separate GossamerAcornWidgetCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/gossamer/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, stay with Room, and keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could GossamerCopperBridgeService show the active FastAPI sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does GossamerMoonlitSDKFlow enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of GossamerRavenSessionStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/gossamer/infra/modules/edge/main.tf. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current Room operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nProduce durable prose rather than a code assessment or implementation change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerLumenChartCoordinator is blocking the next release because an accessibility label that reads the internal enum. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: finish GossamerLumenChartCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Swift 6 conventions in projects/gossamer/engine/render/atlas.cpp; keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.75,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the GossamerEchoRegistryService migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: gossamerslateeditorflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/gossamer/src/sync/reconcile.ts:217:18\n   4: gossamerslateeditorflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the GossamerSlateEditorFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up GossamerMicaProfileCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, which follows gRPC conventions and currently suffers from lost focus when the drawer animation finishes. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerEchoRegistryCoordinator: diagnose, then document","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: # projects/gossamer/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n[worker.gossamerravensessioncoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamerravensessioncoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamerravensessioncoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerRavenSessionCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47158\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/gossamer/infra/modules/edge/main.tf. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-47118: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerEchoRegistryFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for GossamerEchoRegistryFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: // projects/gossamer/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class GossamerCinderAuthFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure GossamerCinderAuthFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerCloudReconcilerCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/gossamer/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte hat GossamerCinderAuthService ein sporadisches Problem im OpenTelemetry-Ablauf. Verfolge Queue, Scheduler und Abbruch, vergleiche Hypothesen und finde die Ursache vor jeder Änderung.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- OpenTelemetry weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf GossamerCinderAuthService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um GossamerCinderAuthService mit OpenTelemetry kompatibel.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-47151: finish the compact GossamerOspreyJobCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/gossamer/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nFramework: OpenTelemetry\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete GossamerOspreyJobCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin GossamerOrbitSyncService's FastAPI dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exponha retryAfter em GossamerIrisBatchService","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"GossamerQuartzPlayerCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: Incident timeline — INC-47141\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerCedarPolicyFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged GossamerCedarPolicyFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerSlateEditorCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current GossamerFlintTimelineStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerFlintTimelineStore\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nReturn an assessment of the existing artifact; only quote enough to make the walkthrough understandable.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: Incident timeline — INC-47157\n\n08:02 deploy GossamerNimbusFormCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for GossamerNimbusFormCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex b/projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is GossamerWillowCodecFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerJuniperCLIService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell GossamerCoralUploadStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, GossamerQuartzPlayerStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the GossamerKiteSchedulerStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a misleading timeout name used in five packages in GossamerMoonlitSDKStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: diff --git a/projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nAdd the bounded GossamerQuartzPlayerFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around GossamerCoralUploadCoordinator: (1) separate GossamerCoralUploadCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for GossamerCinderAuthCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: lay out a staged migration for GossamerCinderAuthCoordinator\n- companion outcome: then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler\n- repository entry point: projects/gossamer/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n- platform constraint: OpenTelemetry\n- known complication: timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerOspreyJobStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: Two asks around GossamerAmberFilterCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/gossamer/infra/modules/edge/main.tf; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/gossamer/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, GossamerCinderAuthStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de OpenTelemetry. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con OpenTelemetry\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a GossamerCinderAuthStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con OpenTelemetry alrededor de GossamerCinderAuthStore.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"GossamerFernSnapshotCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let GossamerJuniperCLIStore adopt FastAPI with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: # projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.gossamersprucedaemonflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossamersprucedaemonflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossamersprucedaemonflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerSpruceDaemonFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47114\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/gossamer/crates/index/src/segment.rs and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect GossamerEmberRelayStore to outgrow its current OpenTelemetry arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing OpenTelemetry deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerEmberRelayStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'GossamerCopperBridgeFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[GossamerCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/gossamer/pkg/cache/lease.rs:144: error: -[GossamerCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[GossamerCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nDetermine why GossamerCopperBridgeFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the GossamerLumenChartStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside GossamerLumenChartStore\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n\nThe relevant code crosses healthcare, Svelte, Kafka. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nProduce durable prose rather than a code assessment or implementation change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de GossamerIrisBatchStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the GossamerSummitProxyStore migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-47159: finish the compact GossamerFlintTimelineCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/gossamer/config/staging.toml\nFramework: FastAPI\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible GossamerFlintTimelineCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go b/projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/internal/auth/refresh.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate GossamerTideWorkerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-47138: retire the legacy replay path for GossamerLedgerGateFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged GossamerLedgerGateFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerTideWorkerCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about GossamerFlintTimelineService, but the current prose in projects/gossamer/packages/api/openapi.yaml only describes the happy path. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerFlintTimelineService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare GossamerMarbleTokenStore's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged GossamerMicaProfileService for a read-only pass because its gRPC boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: GossamerMicaProfileStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/gossamer/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, not an open-ended failure investigation. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to GossamerMicaProfileStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans healthcare, Svelte, Kafka; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer GossamerKiteSchedulerService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The GossamerOpalRouterService surface in projects/gossamer/packages/api/openapi.yaml is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: Two asks around GossamerMosaicGridCoordinator: (1) ship the idempotent GossamerMosaicGridCoordinator replay endpoint; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Keep voiceover and keyboard navigation working, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/gossamer/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n[worker.gossameropalrouterflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossameropalrouterflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossameropalrouterflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerOpalRouterFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47149\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/gossamer/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/gossamer/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.gossameracornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.gossameracornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.gossameracornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.GossamerAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-47133\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign GossamerAcornWidgetFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded GossamerCopperBridgeStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For GossamerIrisBatchCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for GossamerIrisBatchCoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/gossamer/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, stay with Swift 6, and keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check GossamerMapleQueueService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerKiteSchedulerCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerGarnetModalFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/gossamer/ml/pipeline/features.py and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple GossamerSpruceDaemonService's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"GossamerOpalRouterCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended GossamerDeltaCanvasService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep VoiceOver and keyboard navigation working\n- retain the current FastAPI operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this healthcare, Svelte, Kafka monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: diff --git a/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/gossamer/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate GossamerLumenChartFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Investigate the GossamerMosaicGridService hang","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind GossamerSlateEditorStore's OpenTelemetry choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does GossamerAmberFilterStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandMicaProfileCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex as the source of truth, preserve the Playwright contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-48127: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandDeltaCanvasFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current HinterlandDeltaCanvasFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/hinterland/src/sync/reconcile.ts:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: hinterlanddriftconsoleflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/hinterland/src/sync/reconcile.ts:217:18\n   4: hinterlanddriftconsoleflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nFind the source of this HinterlandDriftConsoleFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify HinterlandPrismCacheService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: # projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.hinterlandwillowcodecflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandwillowcodecflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandwillowcodecflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandWillowCodecFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48140\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de HinterlandDeltaCanvasStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"En projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, HinterlandBeaconStoreService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Playwright. Redacta una guía para consumidores con contrato, errores, retry y un ejemplo copiable; no cambies el handler.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Playwright\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a HinterlandBeaconStoreService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Worker: # projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.hinterlandnovapickerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandnovapickerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandnovapickerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandNovaPickerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48123\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandNovaPickerFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: # projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n[worker.hinterlandmicaprofileflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandmicaprofileflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandmicaprofileflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandMicaProfileFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48133\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: projects/hinterland/packages/api/openapi.yaml 里的 HinterlandLumenChartService 最近在 Redis Streams 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请给出阶段、兼容层、指标、rollback 和 ownership，先不要修改代码。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Redis Streams\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 HinterlandLumenChartService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported React 19 version in projects/hinterland/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Wire a HinterlandQuartzPlayerFlow background task in projects/hinterland/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt that expires abandoned sessions, records an OpenTelemetry span, and yields cleanly when shutdown begins.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around HinterlandSableParserCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/hinterland/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Avoid a schema migration in this release, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandEchoRegistryCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandWillowCodecCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCinderAuthCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could HinterlandFlintTimelineService migrate incrementally?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the HinterlandCopperBridgeService migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for HinterlandWrenExportService, and the basic data flow in projects/hinterland/config/staging.toml already works. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Redis Streams deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandWrenExportService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'HinterlandSlateEditorCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[HinterlandSlateEditorCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/hinterland/services/ledger/replay.go:144: error: -[HinterlandSlateEditorCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[HinterlandSlateEditorCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete HinterlandSlateEditorCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is HinterlandRavenSessionStore safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandLedgerGateCoordinator is blocking the next release because lease renewal code copied across three workers. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: produce a consumer guide for HinterlandLedgerGateCoordinator, and give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use the existing React 19 conventions in projects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py; avoid a schema migration in this release. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: # projects/hinterland/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n[worker.hinterlandflinttimelineflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandflinttimelineflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandflinttimelineflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandFlintTimelineFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48132\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandFlintTimelineFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for HinterlandNimbusFormStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For HinterlandPrismCacheCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for HinterlandPrismCacheCoordinator; once that is complete, then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Work from projects/hinterland/packages/api/openapi.yaml, stay with Redis Streams, and avoid a schema migration in this release. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract HinterlandAsterWebhookStore's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer HinterlandGarnetModalService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandSlateEditorService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current Terraform operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does HinterlandIrisBatchStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_48135'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_48135'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nWire HinterlandLumenChartFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating two validators with subtly different error strings in HinterlandBirchMigratorService, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give HinterlandFlintTimelineStore a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Style HinterlandMoonlitSDKService's offline state","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx b/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n+++ b/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Read the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is HinterlandPineMetricsFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether HinterlandWrenExportStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/hinterland/packages/api/openapi.yaml and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move HinterlandWillowCodecService from the legacy store to Redis Streams. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why is HinterlandMicaProfileService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandNovaPickerCoordinator: polish, then document","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/hinterland/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class HinterlandEmberRelayFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about HinterlandEmberRelayFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/hinterland/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift now contains HinterlandMarbleTokenService's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The destination for HinterlandFernSnapshotService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/hinterland/pkg/cache/lease.rs to that target. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandFernSnapshotService\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-48125: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandPrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise HinterlandPrismCacheFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandSableParserService's Doctor.swift needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Diff: The public surface of HinterlandPineMetricsService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandPineMetricsService\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandBirchMigratorCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of HinterlandIrisBatchService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current Redis Streams operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: // projects/hinterland/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class HinterlandBirchMigratorFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit HinterlandBirchMigratorFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind HinterlandDriftConsoleService's Core Data choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: Ticket OPS-48119: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise HinterlandCloudReconcilerFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: diff --git a/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx b/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n+++ b/projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Wire HinterlandBeaconStoreCoordinator's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandHarborIndexStore is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current React 19 operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Repository: Could the reasoning behind HinterlandWillowCodecStore's Redis Streams choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter? The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the HinterlandCedarPolicyService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move HinterlandAcornWidgetFlow from the legacy store to React 19. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move HinterlandEchoRegistryStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: // projects/hinterland/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class HinterlandHarborIndexFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure HinterlandHarborIndexFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandMapleQueueCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the HinterlandCedarPolicyStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandCedarPolicyStore\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nThe server contract is the subject, but the requested output is documentation rather than handler code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find HinterlandCraneWorkspaceService's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: diff --git a/projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py b/projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py\n+++ b/projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is HinterlandRavenSessionFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandVelaDrawerCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited HinterlandRainfallDBStore and need a careful read of projects/hinterland/config/staging.toml before I can sign off on the next release. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Redis Streams deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandRainfallDBStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandAtlasSearchService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split HinterlandAsterWebhookService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: // projects/hinterland/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nfinal class HinterlandJuniperCLIFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit HinterlandJuniperCLIFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, HinterlandOrbitSyncService has shown duplicate retries after a network handoff; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Core Data deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandOrbitSyncService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-48138\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandBasilRunnerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for HinterlandBasilRunnerFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: diff --git a/projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte b/projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n+++ b/projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate HinterlandCopperBridgeFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandBasilRunnerCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandOspreyJobCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate HinterlandOspreyJobCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/hinterland/internal/auth/refresh.go as the source of truth, preserve the Terraform contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a HinterlandDriftConsoleStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_48151'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_48151'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nFind the source of this HinterlandAmberFilterCoordinator symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence HinterlandOspreyJobStore's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Investigate the HinterlandOspreyJobService hang","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex の HinterlandMapleQueueService で、Playwright の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- Playwright を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は HinterlandMapleQueueService のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandAsterWebhookCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandMarbleTokenCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-48118\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandAsterWebhookFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the HinterlandAsterWebhookFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: Incident timeline — INC-48154\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandCoralUploadCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the HinterlandCoralUploadCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandLumenChartCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does HinterlandEmberRelayStore propagate cancellation through the Terraform boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: Incident timeline — INC-48146\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandMarbleTokenFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nDetermine why HinterlandMarbleTokenFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the HinterlandMoonlitSDKStore setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For HinterlandRavenSessionCoordinator, separate HinterlandRavenSessionCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py, stay with React 19, and avoid a schema migration in this release. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandKiteSchedulerCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: projects/hinterland/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx 里的 HinterlandMapleQueueStore 最近在 Playwright 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请追踪 queue、scheduler 和取消路径，对比假设，先定位原因再提修改。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Playwright\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 HinterlandMapleQueueStore","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Today: // projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class HinterlandQuartzPlayerCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about HinterlandQuartzPlayerCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: # projects/hinterland/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n[worker.hinterlandsableparserflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandsableparserflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandsableparserflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandSableParserFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48126\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandSableParserFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs now contains HinterlandIrisBatchFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current HinterlandAmberFilterService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandAmberFilterService\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/hinterland/lib/codec/frame.cc; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: Incident timeline — INC-48122\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise HinterlandOpalRouterFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does HinterlandVelaDrawerStore propagate cancellation through the Redis Streams boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited HinterlandFrostPanelService and need a careful read of projects/hinterland/engine/render/atlas.cpp before I can sign off on the next release. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Playwright deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandFrostPanelService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move HinterlandSpruceDaemonService's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could HinterlandCoralUploadStore show the active Terraform sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandSpruceDaemonCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current HinterlandCopperBridgeStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandCopperBridgeStore\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.hinterlandledgergateflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandledgergateflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandledgergateflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandLedgerGateFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48111\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandLedgerGateFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/hinterland/engine/render/atlas.cpp and tell me whether HinterlandBasilRunnerStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-48124: finish the compact HinterlandOspreyJobFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/hinterland/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nFramework: Terraform\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring HinterlandOspreyJobFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandMosaicGridCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new HinterlandSpruceDaemonStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the HinterlandNovaPickerStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For HinterlandGarnetModalCoordinator, separate HinterlandGarnetModalCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/hinterland/lib/codec/frame.cc, stay with Playwright, and avoid a schema migration in this release. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCopperBridgeCoordinator: sequence, then restructure","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up HinterlandJuniperCLICoordinator. First, finish HinterlandJuniperCLICoordinator's responsive empty and retry states. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/hinterland/src/sync/reconcile.ts, which follows Core Data conventions and currently suffers from duplicate retries after a network handoff. Avoid a schema migration in this release.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.75,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 48121: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: React 19\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] HinterlandTideWorkerFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] HinterlandTideWorkerFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Add the bounded HinterlandTideWorkerFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_48137'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_48137'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Determine why HinterlandSpruceDaemonFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the HinterlandOpalRouterService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe HinterlandOpalRouterStore's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for HinterlandFernSnapshotCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: finish HinterlandFernSnapshotCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n- platform constraint: Redis Streams\n- known complication: an accessibility label that reads the internal enum\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Avoid a schema migration in this release; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in HinterlandWrenExportFlow lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandAcornWidgetService needs a production server path for replaying tenant events; the public envelope is agreed but persistence and retry handling are not wired. Add signed cursor parsing, bounded pagination, key rotation, tenant checks, and a resumable background path with metrics for lag, retries, and terminal failures.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current React 19 operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-48144: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandKiteSchedulerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess HinterlandKiteSchedulerFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does HinterlandBasilRunnerService enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported Terraform version in projects/hinterland/infra/modules/edge/main.tf is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip HinterlandTideWorkerService's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in HinterlandEmberRelayService lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de HinterlandCloudReconcilerService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-48129: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandMoonlitSDKFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. From this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for HinterlandMoonlitSDKFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandAtlasSearchCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'HinterlandWrenExportCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[HinterlandWrenExportCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/hinterland/packages/api/openapi.yaml:144: error: -[HinterlandWrenExportCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[HinterlandWrenExportCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible HinterlandWrenExportCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: The next client release depends on a new HinterlandSlateEditorStore capability in projects/hinterland/services/ledger/replay.go, with Terraform already chosen by the platform group. Wire the schema, repository, handler, and worker so duplicate deliveries return the original result and shutdown never acknowledges uncommitted work.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Terraform deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandSlateEditorStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe contract notes are context; the requested outcome is the working server path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandEmberRelayCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: HinterlandJuniperCLIStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/hinterland/src/sync/reconcile.ts, not an open-ended failure investigation. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- stay compatible with the existing Core Data deployment\n- keep the work scoped to HinterlandJuniperCLIStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this search, Terraform, Flutter monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the HinterlandNimbusFormService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a HinterlandAcornWidgetStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move HinterlandBeaconStoreFlow's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: Move HinterlandTideWorkerStore behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around HinterlandFlintTimelineCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/hinterland/src/sync/reconcile.ts; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Avoid a schema migration in this release, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: // projects/hinterland/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nfinal class HinterlandOrbitSyncCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nDeliver the HinterlandOrbitSyncCoordinator server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCloudReconcilerCoordinator: sequence, then ship","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandOpalRouterCoordinator: ship, then correct","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove HinterlandGarnetModalStore's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: # projects/hinterland/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.hinterlandacornwidgetcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandacornwidgetcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandacornwidgetcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandAcornWidgetCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48156\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandAcornWidgetCoordinator's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vereinheitliche die HinterlandCloudReconcilerStore-Validatoren","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"# projects/hinterland/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.hinterlandgarnetmodalflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandgarnetmodalflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandgarnetmodalflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandGarnetModalFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48128\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/hinterland/engine/render/atlas.cpp and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandNimbusFormCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate HinterlandNimbusFormCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs as the source of truth, preserve the Redis Streams contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter HinterlandSummitProxyFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × HinterlandSummitProxyFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=48147 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=48147 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=48147 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=48147 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the HinterlandSummitProxyFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find HinterlandSableParserStore's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandSummitProxyCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for HinterlandPineMetricsCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: produce a consumer guide for HinterlandPineMetricsCoordinator\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n- platform constraint: Playwright\n- known complication: a query plan that changes after statistics refresh\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Avoid a schema migration in this release; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn HinterlandAmberFilterStore's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/hinterland/infra/modules/edge/main.tf; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the HinterlandNovaPickerService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a misleading timeout name used in five packages in HinterlandOrbitSyncFlow, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: Ticket OPS-48149: retire the legacy replay path for HinterlandAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise HinterlandAtlasSearchFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandHarborIndexCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: The name pendingAck means two different things across HinterlandFrostPanelFlow's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did HinterlandCraneWorkspaceStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current HinterlandQuartzPlayerService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandQuartzPlayerService\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Persist HinterlandAtlasSearchStore delivery attempts in projects/hinterland/services/ledger/replay.go, claim them safely across workers, and make duplicate webhook receipts return the original accepted result.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/hinterland/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nfinal class HinterlandCraneWorkspaceFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate HinterlandCraneWorkspaceFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the HinterlandRavenSessionService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: A flaky failure around HinterlandCoralUploadService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandCoralUploadService\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: // projects/hinterland/internal/auth/refresh.go\nfinal class HinterlandCinderAuthFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure HinterlandCinderAuthFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: A copied hex color in HinterlandVelaDrawerService lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandRainfallDBService flakes under UTC","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe HinterlandHarborIndexService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCinderAuthService's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/hinterland/internal/auth/refresh.go value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move HinterlandSlateEditorFlow's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow pod=hinterlandmosaicgridflow-7cf8 request_id=48148 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=hinterlandmosaicgridflow request_id=48148 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nFind the source of this HinterlandMosaicGridFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should HinterlandPrismCacheStore be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: sequence, then restructure","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: # projects/hinterland/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.hinterlandcedarpolicyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandcedarpolicyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandcedarpolicyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandCedarPolicyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48114\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign HinterlandCedarPolicyFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/hinterland/internal/auth/refresh.go and tell me whether HinterlandKiteSchedulerStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandTideWorkerCoordinator: sequence, then polish","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-48110\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandFernSnapshotFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise HinterlandFernSnapshotFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'HinterlandMapleQueueFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[HinterlandMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/hinterland/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:144: error: -[HinterlandMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[HinterlandMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible HinterlandMapleQueueFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py: remove the obsolete HinterlandEchoRegistryService import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/hinterland/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt into independently owned modules while HinterlandSummitProxyService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'HinterlandEchoRegistryFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[HinterlandEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py:144: error: -[HinterlandEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[HinterlandEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete HinterlandEchoRegistryFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The HinterlandCinderAuthStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could HinterlandMosaicGridService show the active Playwright sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate HinterlandBeaconStoreStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py, HinterlandLedgerGateStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de React 19. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con React 19\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a HinterlandLedgerGateStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con React 19 alrededor de HinterlandLedgerGateStore.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended HinterlandPineMetricsStore independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current Playwright operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandCedarPolicyCoordinator is blocking the next release because two validators with subtly different error strings. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: lay out a staged migration for HinterlandCedarPolicyCoordinator, and consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use the existing Terraform conventions in projects/hinterland/infra/modules/edge/main.tf; avoid a schema migration in this release. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up HinterlandRainfallDBCoordinator. First, produce a consumer guide for HinterlandRainfallDBCoordinator. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/hinterland/config/staging.toml, which follows Redis Streams conventions and currently suffers from memory growth during hour-long imports. Avoid a schema migration in this release.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/hinterland/config/staging.toml, o HinterlandLumenChartStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Redis Streams. Siga queue, scheduler e cancelamento, compare hipóteses e encontre a causa antes de mudar código.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Redis Streams\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao HinterlandLumenChartStore","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around HinterlandMoonlitSDKCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/hinterland/services/ledger/replay.go; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Avoid a schema migration in this release, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Drop HinterlandMicaProfileStore's unused import","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-48130\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the HinterlandNimbusFormFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandDriftConsoleCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: // projects/hinterland/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nfinal class HinterlandRainfallDBFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about HinterlandRainfallDBFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: # projects/hinterland/lib/codec/frame.cc\n[worker.hinterlandfrostpanelcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.hinterlandfrostpanelcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.hinterlandfrostpanelcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.HinterlandFrostPanelCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-48158\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/hinterland/lib/codec/frame.cc and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandFernSnapshotStore is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current Redis Streams operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/hinterland/config/staging.toml\nfinal class HinterlandVelaDrawerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Walk through what the artifact proves about HinterlandVelaDrawerFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"HinterlandDeltaCanvasCoordinator needs a paired pass: change HinterlandDeltaCanvasCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/hinterland/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte as the source of truth, preserve the Core Data contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: The behavior of HinterlandJuniperCLIService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/hinterland/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n- retain the current Core Data operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses search, Terraform, Flutter. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for HinterlandOrbitSyncStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current HinterlandFrostPanelStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside HinterlandFrostPanelStore\n- avoid a schema migration in this release\n\nThis repository spans search, Terraform, Flutter; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de HinterlandDeltaCanvasService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across HinterlandMarbleTokenStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: projects/hinterland/cmd/exporter/main.py の HinterlandAmberFilterFlow で、React 19 の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 queue、scheduler、cancel 経路を追い、仮説を比較して、変更前に原因を特定してください。\n\n制約:\n- React 19 を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は HinterlandAmberFilterFlow のみ","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"In projects/hinterland/ml/pipeline/features.py hat HinterlandLedgerGateService ein sporadisches Problem im React 19-Ablauf. Verfolge Queue, Scheduler und Abbruch, vergleiche Hypothesen und finde die Ursache vor jeder Änderung.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- React 19 weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf HinterlandLedgerGateService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um HinterlandLedgerGateService mit React 19 kompatibel.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: Incident timeline — INC-48150\n\n08:02 deploy HinterlandIrisBatchCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible HinterlandIrisBatchCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/isotope/ml/pipeline/features.py by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-49139: finish the compact IsotopeHarborIndexFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/isotope/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible IsotopeHarborIndexFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeSummitProxyCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the IsotopeAmberFilterService modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through IsotopeIrisBatchStore's SyncWorker.kt","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift b/projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n+++ b/projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure IsotopeCloudReconcilerFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Wire a IsotopeFlintTimelineFlow background task in projects/isotope/services/ledger/replay.go that expires abandoned sessions, records an OpenTelemetry span, and yields cleanly when shutdown begins.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says IsotopeFlintTimelineService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: The IsotopeLedgerGateService feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeSableParserCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach IsotopeOpalRouterStore to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nfinal class IsotopeBeaconStoreFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about IsotopeBeaconStoreFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could IsotopeNovaPickerService show the active NATS JetStream sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeKiteSchedulerCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml の IsotopeGarnetModalFlow で、NATS JetStream の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 責務を分離して重複をなくし、API、wire value、順序、観測可能な動作は変えないでください。\n\n制約:\n- NATS JetStream を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は IsotopeGarnetModalFlow のみ","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Ember: Incident timeline — INC-49124\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeAmberFilterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nDetermine why IsotopeAmberFilterFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit IsotopeSlateEditorFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for IsotopeCloudReconcilerStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeWrenExportCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for IsotopeWrenExportCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql as the source of truth, preserve the SQLite contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: The first IsotopeBirchMigratorFlow request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: Two asks around IsotopeAmberFilterCoordinator: (1) separate IsotopeAmberFilterCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around IsotopeDeltaCanvasFlow now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeMosaicGridCoordinator: polish, then assess","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: Two asks around IsotopeFernSnapshotCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-49148: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopePrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise IsotopePrismCacheFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split IsotopeOrbitSyncService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify IsotopeMapleQueueService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare IsotopeMosaicGridStore's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the IsotopeEchoRegistryService setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported WebGPU version in projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for IsotopeDriftConsoleCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: find the unknown cause of stale cursors when a page is resumed\n- companion outcome: correct the known stale timeout beside it\n- repository entry point: projects/isotope/services/ledger/replay.go\n- platform constraint: PostgreSQL 17\n- known complication: stale cursors when a page is resumed\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-49159: finish the compact IsotopeBirchMigratorCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/isotope/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring IsotopeBirchMigratorCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeRavenSessionStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether IsotopeCinderAuthFlow's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/isotope/cmd/exporter/main.py and settle that question from the code. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: Split projects/isotope/config/staging.toml by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: The public surface of IsotopeMapleQueueStore is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeMapleQueueStore\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around IsotopeQuartzPlayerCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for IsotopeQuartzPlayerCoordinator; (2) then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does IsotopeCopperBridgeStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists? Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move IsotopeTideWorkerService from the legacy store to Tokio. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for IsotopeAcornWidgetStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeLedgerGateCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeSpruceDaemonCoordinator is blocking the next release because duplicate retries after a network handoff. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: find the unknown cause of duplicate retries after a network handoff, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing PostgreSQL 17 conventions in projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go; keep the patch readable for a small on-call review. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-49113\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeWillowCodecFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. From this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for IsotopeWillowCodecFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded IsotopeCloudReconcilerService export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded IsotopePineMetricsService export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare IsotopeIrisBatchService's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'IsotopeWrenExportFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[IsotopeWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/isotope/src/sync/reconcile.ts:144: error: -[IsotopeWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[IsotopeWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete IsotopeWrenExportFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The IsotopeCedarPolicyStore surface in projects/isotope/cmd/exporter/main.py is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de IsotopeMarbleTokenService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'IsotopeAtlasSearchFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[IsotopeAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift:144: error: -[IsotopeAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[IsotopeAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete IsotopeAtlasSearchFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale IsotopeDriftConsoleStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: IsotopeEmberRelayService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeEmberRelayService\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-49158: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeLumenChartCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess IsotopeLumenChartCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml, IsotopeBasilRunnerStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de NATS JetStream. Propón fases, compatibilidad, métricas, rollback y ownership; detente antes de tocar código.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con NATS JetStream\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a IsotopeBasilRunnerStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con NATS JetStream alrededor de IsotopeBasilRunnerStore.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the IsotopeSlateEditorStore changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeAtlasSearchService flakes under UTC","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find IsotopeFernSnapshotStore's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: Test Suite 'IsotopeTideWorkerFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[IsotopeTideWorkerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/isotope/lib/codec/frame.cc:144: error: -[IsotopeTideWorkerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[IsotopeTideWorkerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring IsotopeTideWorkerFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt b/projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n+++ b/projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is IsotopeFernSnapshotFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the IsotopeMosaicGridService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach IsotopeOspreyJobService to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: diff --git a/projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate IsotopeNovaPickerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: Ticket OPS-49112: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeEmberRelayFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise IsotopeEmberRelayFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about IsotopeLumenChartStore, but the current prose in projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing SQLite deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeLumenChartStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt 里的 IsotopeCraneWorkspaceStore 最近在 SQLite 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请阅读现有流程，判断 ownership、取消和顺序是否安全，只需要分析。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 SQLite\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 IsotopeCraneWorkspaceStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a IsotopeNovaPickerStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip IsotopeWrenExportService's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeHarborIndexCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeTideWorkerCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Korrigiere den IsotopeMarbleTokenStore-Timeout","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: IsotopeCinderAuthService has one known configuration mistake in projects/isotope/cmd/exporter/main.py, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeCinderAuthService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: The destination for IsotopeDeltaCanvasService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go to that target. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeDeltaCanvasService\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in IsotopeSummitProxyStore?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the IsotopeQuartzPlayerStore migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: Test Suite 'IsotopeRainfallDBFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[IsotopeRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql:144: error: -[IsotopeRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[IsotopeRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring IsotopeRainfallDBFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is IsotopeVelaDrawerFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/isotope/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.isotopecinderauthcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.isotopecinderauthcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.isotopecinderauthcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.IsotopeCinderAuthCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-49157\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/isotope/ml/pipeline/features.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeOspreyJobCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeIrisBatchCoordinator: diagnose, then assess","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let IsotopeFlintTimelineStore adopt PostgreSQL 17 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: Two asks around IsotopeCoralUploadCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for IsotopeCoralUploadCoordinator; (2) then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: # projects/isotope/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.isotopeacornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.isotopeacornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.isotopeacornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.IsotopeAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-49129\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Make the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/isotope/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the IsotopeAtlasSearchStore migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe IsotopeDriftConsoleService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-49111\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeBasilRunnerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the IsotopeBasilRunnerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up IsotopeEchoRegistryCoordinator. First, lay out a staged migration for IsotopeEchoRegistryCoordinator. In the same workstream, also add the visible loading and offline states. The relevant starting point is projects/isotope/lib/codec/frame.cc, which follows Tokio conventions and currently suffers from a misleading timeout name used in five packages. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeFrostPanelStore's openapi.yaml needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter IsotopeNimbusFormCoordinator\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × IsotopeNimbusFormCoordinator > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=49153 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=49153 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=49153 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=49153 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Find the source of this IsotopeNimbusFormCoordinator symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"We need to move IsotopeRavenSessionFlow from the legacy store to Tokio. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeRainfallDBCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: Incident timeline — INC-49125\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeOrbitSyncFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for IsotopeOrbitSyncFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give IsotopeNimbusFormStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeHarborIndexStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte の IsotopeCraneWorkspaceService で、SQLite の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 責務を分離して重複をなくし、API、wire value、順序、観測可能な動作は変えないでください。\n\n制約:\n- SQLite を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は IsotopeCraneWorkspaceService のみ","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Correct the IsotopeKiteSchedulerService flag default","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bump IsotopeSlateEditorService's timeout to 30s","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a deadlock that appears only during shutdown in IsotopeRainfallDBStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and tell me whether IsotopeRainfallDBService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeOpalRouterCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for IsotopeEmberRelayCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: lay out a staged migration for IsotopeEmberRelayCoordinator\n- companion outcome: then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler\n- repository entry point: projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n- platform constraint: WebGPU\n- known complication: two validators with subtly different error strings\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.93,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check IsotopeBeaconStoreService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeCloudReconcilerCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-49117\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeKiteSchedulerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the IsotopeKiteSchedulerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The public surface of IsotopeWillowCodecStore is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeWillowCodecStore\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopePineMetricsCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/isotope/config/staging.toml hat IsotopeBasilRunnerService ein sporadisches Problem im NATS JetStream-Ablauf. Verfasse eine Consumer-Doku mit Vertrag, Fehlern, Retry und einem kopierbaren Beispiel; ändere keinen Handler.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- NATS JetStream weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf IsotopeBasilRunnerService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um IsotopeBasilRunnerService mit NATS JetStream kompatibel.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Tide: // projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class IsotopeIrisBatchFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit IsotopeIrisBatchFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited IsotopeKiteSchedulerStore and need a careful read of projects/isotope/cmd/exporter/main.py before I can sign off on the next release. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeKiteSchedulerStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The first IsotopeOspreyJobStore request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeNovaPickerCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit IsotopeDeltaCanvasCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeJuniperCLICoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of IsotopeEmberRelayStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Incident timeline — INC-49141\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeAsterWebhookFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current IsotopeAsterWebhookFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about IsotopeEchoRegistryStore, but the current prose in projects/isotope/lib/codec/frame.cc only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing Tokio deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeEchoRegistryStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, IsotopeNimbusFormService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de SQLite. Sigue queue, scheduler y cancelación, compara hipótesis y encuentra la causa antes de proponer cambios.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con SQLite\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a IsotopeNimbusFormService","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue 里的 IsotopeJuniperCLIService 最近在 PostgreSQL 17 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 PostgreSQL 17\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 IsotopeJuniperCLIService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing IsotopeWrenExportStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip IsotopeVelaDrawerStore's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged IsotopeBirchMigratorStore for a read-only pass because its Tokio boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopePrismCacheCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 49130: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: PostgreSQL 17\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] IsotopeQuartzPlayerFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] IsotopeQuartzPlayerFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nDeliver the IsotopeQuartzPlayerFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: // projects/isotope/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class IsotopeEchoRegistryFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about IsotopeEchoRegistryFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: diff --git a/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/isotope/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nWire IsotopeMoonlitSDKCoordinator's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about IsotopeGarnetModalService, but the current prose in projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing NATS JetStream deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeGarnetModalService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: # projects/isotope/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.isotoperavensessioncoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.isotoperavensessioncoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.isotoperavensessioncoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.IsotopeRavenSessionCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-49154\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/isotope/engine/render/atlas.cpp and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current IsotopeMicaProfileService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeMicaProfileService\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeMapleQueueCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for IsotopeMicaProfileStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeFrostPanelCoordinator needs a paired pass: find the unknown cause of stale cursors when a page is resumed, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml as the source of truth, preserve the NATS JetStream contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: The IsotopeGarnetModalStore empty state in projects/isotope/config/staging.toml needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: Incident timeline — INC-49147\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeOspreyJobFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current IsotopeOspreyJobFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence IsotopeFernSnapshotService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale IsotopeLumenChartService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to IsotopeLedgerGateStore rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeCopperBridgeCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the IsotopeBirchMigratorService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeBirchMigratorService\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeVelaDrawerCoordinator: polish, then assess","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the IsotopeQuartzPlayerService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/isotope/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx: remove the obsolete IsotopeHarborIndexService import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged IsotopeMoonlitSDKService for a read-only pass because its WebGPU boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans media encoding, Python ML, Windows; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does IsotopeOpalRouterService propagate cancellation through the PostgreSQL 17 boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-49110\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeSpruceDaemonFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nReconstruct the IsotopeSpruceDaemonFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve IsotopeTideWorkerStore, assess whether an accessibility label that reads the internal enum is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/isotope/services/ledger/replay.go, o IsotopeJuniperCLIStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de PostgreSQL 17. Siga queue, scheduler e cancelamento, compare hipóteses e encontre a causa antes de mudar código.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com PostgreSQL 17\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao IsotopeJuniperCLIStore","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate IsotopeMapleQueueFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for IsotopeSpruceDaemonService, and the basic data flow in projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf already works. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeSpruceDaemonService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For IsotopeAcornWidgetCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/isotope/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/isotope/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, stay with Tokio, and keep the patch readable for a small on-call review. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: Incident timeline — INC-49131\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeFrostPanelFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible IsotopeFrostPanelFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeDeltaCanvasStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/isotope/infra/modules/edge/main.tf value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-49135: finish the compact IsotopeJuniperCLIFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nFramework: PostgreSQL 17\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring IsotopeJuniperCLIFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeWillowCodecCoordinator is blocking the next release because memory growth during hour-long imports. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: produce a consumer guide for IsotopeWillowCodecCoordinator, and give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use the existing SQLite conventions in projects/isotope/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte; keep the patch readable for a small on-call review. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For IsotopeBeaconStoreCoordinator, separate IsotopeBeaconStoreCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs, stay with NATS JetStream, and keep the patch readable for a small on-call review. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/isotope/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.isotopecedarpolicyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.isotopecedarpolicyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.isotopecedarpolicyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.IsotopeCedarPolicyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-49137\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Align IsotopeCedarPolicyFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"IsotopePrismCacheStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/isotope/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Style IsotopeSummitProxyService's offline state","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Drop IsotopeAmberFilterStore's unused import","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give IsotopeAcornWidgetService a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-49136: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopePineMetricsFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged IsotopePineMetricsFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: IsotopeRavenSessionService has one known configuration mistake in projects/isotope/lib/codec/frame.cc, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing Tokio deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeRavenSessionService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-49127\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeCoralUploadFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise IsotopeCoralUploadFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopePrismCacheService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-49143: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeCraneWorkspaceFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess IsotopeCraneWorkspaceFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip IsotopeBeaconStoreStore's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The IsotopeCinderAuthStore empty state in projects/isotope/ml/pipeline/features.py needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeAtlasSearchCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go b/projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go\n+++ b/projects/isotope/internal/auth/refresh.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate IsotopeCopperBridgeFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: Ticket OPS-49134: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeLedgerGateFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for IsotopeLedgerGateFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-49149: finish the compact IsotopeSableParserFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/isotope/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete IsotopeSableParserFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: Ticket OPS-49120: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the IsotopeSummitProxyFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate IsotopeSableParserStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check IsotopeVelaDrawerService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: For IsotopeSlateEditorCoordinator, change IsotopeSlateEditorCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/isotope/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, stay with WebGPU, and keep the patch readable for a small on-call review. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: diff --git a/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/isotope/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit IsotopeMicaProfileCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about IsotopeWillowCodecService, but the current prose in projects/isotope/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n- stay compatible with the existing SQLite deployment\n- keep the work scoped to IsotopeWillowCodecService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses media encoding, Python ML, Windows. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeOrbitSyncCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for IsotopeOrbitSyncCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue as the source of truth, preserve the PostgreSQL 17 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: PM is preparing the IsotopeSpruceDaemonStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside IsotopeSpruceDaemonStore\n- keep the patch readable for a small on-call review\n\nSeveral teams work in this media encoding, Python ML, Windows monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for IsotopeFrostPanelService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could IsotopeCopperBridgeService show the active PostgreSQL 17 sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: diff --git a/projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue b/projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n+++ b/projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is IsotopeDriftConsoleFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeMarbleTokenCoordinator: sequence, then restructure","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nfinal class IsotopeMosaicGridFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Deliver the IsotopeMosaicGridFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Trace: Ticket OPS-49119: retire the legacy replay path for IsotopeMarbleTokenFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess IsotopeMarbleTokenFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A copied hex color in IsotopeNimbusFormFlow lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up IsotopeBasilRunnerCoordinator. First, separate IsotopeBasilRunnerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/isotope/packages/api/openapi.yaml, which follows NATS JetStream conventions and currently suffers from a query plan that changes after statistics refresh. Keep the patch readable for a small on-call review.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: Incident timeline — INC-49145\n\n08:02 deploy IsotopeOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Using this as the starting evidence, propose a staged IsotopeOpalRouterFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeAsterWebhookCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeLumenChartFlow has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeCoralUploadService é seguro?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Console: // projects/isotope/config/staging.toml\nfinal class IsotopeGarnetModalCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure IsotopeGarnetModalCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around IsotopeMicaProfileFlow now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach IsotopeAsterWebhookService to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: projects/isotope/crates/index/src/segment.rs now contains IsotopePineMetricsStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document IsotopeOrbitSyncStore's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat IsotopeCoralUploadStore","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"The first IsotopeSableParserService request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"IsotopeCedarPolicyCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Repository: The name pendingAck means two different things across IsotopeMoonlitSDKStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: // projects/isotope/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class IsotopeFlintTimelineCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate IsotopeFlintTimelineCoordinator's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: Ticket OPS-50147: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionAmberFilterFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged JunctionAmberFilterFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'JunctionEchoRegistryFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/config/staging.toml:144: error: -[JunctionEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionEchoRegistryFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Bring JunctionEchoRegistryFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: # projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.junctionsummitproxyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctionsummitproxyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctionsummitproxyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionSummitProxyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50143\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Make JunctionOpalRouterStore keyboard navigable","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'JunctionCopperBridgeFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py:144: error: -[JunctionCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionCopperBridgeFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Bring JunctionCopperBridgeFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"JunctionDriftConsoleCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 50144: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Cloudflare Workers\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] JunctionMosaicGridFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] JunctionMosaicGridFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nDeliver the JunctionMosaicGridFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the JunctionFlintTimelineService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionMosaicGridCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue b/projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n+++ b/projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Consolidate JunctionPrismCacheFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the JunctionTideWorkerService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionOrbitSyncCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer JunctionOpalRouterService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-50120\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionOspreyJobFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise JunctionOspreyJobFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex 里的 JunctionEmberRelayService 最近在 Spring Boot 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请追踪 queue、scheduler 和取消路径，对比假设，先定位原因再提修改。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Spring Boot\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 JunctionEmberRelayService","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about JunctionHarborIndexService, but the current prose in projects/junction/crates/index/src/segment.rs only describes the happy path. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionHarborIndexService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, o JunctionEmberRelayStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Spring Boot. Finalize o layout responsivo, estados vazio e retry, foco por teclado, dark mode e reduced motion.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Spring Boot\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao JunctionEmberRelayStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: # projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.junctionslateeditorcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctionslateeditorcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctionslateeditorcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionSlateEditorCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50155\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is JunctionDriftConsoleFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: A copied hex color in JunctionAtlasSearchStore lost one digit. Replace #1F293 with the approved #1F2937 and keep the rest of the stylesheet untouched.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The JunctionMosaicGridService feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: projects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py 里的 JunctionSummitProxyStore 最近在 Kotlin coroutines 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Kotlin coroutines\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 JunctionSummitProxyStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"JunctionTideWorkerCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50125: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionMoonlitSDKFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the JunctionMoonlitSDKFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionJuniperCLIFlow's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/junction/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Centre la modale JunctionNovaPickerService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: Test Suite 'JunctionVelaDrawerFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue:144: error: -[JunctionVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionVelaDrawerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible JunctionVelaDrawerFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for JunctionRainfallDBCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change JunctionRainfallDBCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n- platform constraint: GraphQL\n- known complication: memory growth during hour-long imports\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence JunctionGarnetModalService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionVelaDrawerCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: The JunctionEchoRegistryService surface in projects/junction/config/staging.toml is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production says JunctionCopperBridgeService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Reconstruct the failing timeline from logs and tests, identify which invariant first breaks, and distinguish causal signals from effects or cleanup noise.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Kotlin coroutines operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn JunctionAmberFilterService's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionAmberFilterCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionKiteSchedulerCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionFrostPanelStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/junction/src/sync/reconcile.ts value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check JunctionMoonlitSDKService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-50154\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionFrostPanelCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible JunctionFrostPanelCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ist JunctionNovaPickerStore sicher?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Today: The behavior of JunctionWrenExportService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current GraphQL operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter JunctionGarnetModalFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × JunctionGarnetModalFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=50124 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=50124 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=50124 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=50124 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the JunctionGarnetModalFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n[worker.junctionjuniperclicoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctionjuniperclicoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctionjuniperclicoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionJuniperCLICoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50158\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/junction/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50129: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Turn the material above into a concise JunctionMicaProfileFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/junction/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and tell me whether JunctionBasilRunnerStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionOpalRouterCoordinator: ship, then document","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-50146: finish the compact JunctionIrisBatchFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/junction/internal/auth/refresh.go\nFramework: GraphQL\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring JunctionIrisBatchFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: diff --git a/projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go b/projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go\n+++ b/projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit JunctionLumenChartFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionMarbleTokenCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe JunctionOspreyJobStore's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of JunctionTideWorkerStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/junction/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Stream JunctionSableParserService's audit events","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionEmberRelayCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate JunctionBeaconStoreService's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionBirchMigratorCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs as the source of truth, preserve the Kafka contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe JunctionFlintTimelineStore's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionRavenSessionService é seguro?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"JunctionEchoRegistryCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'JunctionMapleQueueFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt:144: error: -[JunctionMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete JunctionMapleQueueFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter JunctionTideWorkerFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × JunctionTideWorkerFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=50117 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=50117 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=50117 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=50117 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nDetermine why JunctionTideWorkerFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: Incident timeline — INC-50114\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionAsterWebhookFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise JunctionAsterWebhookFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: Ticket OPS-50159: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionPineMetricsCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged JunctionPineMetricsCoordinator migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py の JunctionSummitProxyService で、Kotlin coroutines の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 consumer 向けに contract、error、retry、コピー可能な例を含む文書を書き、handler は変更しないでください。\n\n制約:\n- Kotlin coroutines を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は JunctionSummitProxyService のみ","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Move JunctionEchoRegistryStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around JunctionMoonlitSDKCoordinator: (1) finish JunctionMoonlitSDKCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for JunctionAsterWebhookCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate JunctionAsterWebhookCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/junction/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n- platform constraint: Cloudflare Workers\n- known complication: cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check JunctionLumenChartStore's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unifie les validateurs de JunctionRavenSessionStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of JunctionFrostPanelService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Cloudflare Workers operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does JunctionBirchMigratorStore own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing JunctionMicaProfileService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up JunctionCedarPolicyCoordinator. First, separate JunctionCedarPolicyCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/junction/engine/render/atlas.cpp, which follows Spring Boot conventions and currently suffers from two validators with subtly different error strings. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionSummitProxyCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionFernSnapshotFlow has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale JunctionCedarPolicyService value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The JunctionQuartzPlayerFlow surface in projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: Two deliverables are holding up JunctionCopperBridgeCoordinator. First, separate JunctionCopperBridgeCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py, which follows Kotlin coroutines conventions and currently suffers from stale cursors when a page is resumed. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionDeltaCanvasStore crashes after reconnect","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionDeltaCanvasCoordinator: sequence, then ship","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple JunctionMoonlitSDKStore's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a deadlock that appears only during shutdown in JunctionDriftConsoleService, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50151: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionWrenExportCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for JunctionWrenExportCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: Two asks around JunctionLumenChartCoordinator: (1) change JunctionLumenChartCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.22,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for JunctionIrisBatchStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate JunctionPineMetricsFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionHarborIndexCoordinator is blocking the next release because a misleading timeout name used in five packages. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Kafka conventions in projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs; retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: The data is already available in projects/junction/engine/render/atlas.cpp; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: The public surface of JunctionJuniperCLIService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/junction/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionJuniperCLIService\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionWillowCodecCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to JunctionKiteSchedulerService rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For JunctionRavenSessionCoordinator, finish JunctionRavenSessionCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/junction/config/staging.toml, stay with Kafka, and retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionMicaProfileCoordinator needs a paired pass: change JunctionMicaProfileCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/junction/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt as the source of truth, preserve the Cloudflare Workers contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.29,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give JunctionLedgerGateStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionCloudReconcilerCoordinator is blocking the next release because a feature flag whose default differs between environments. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: find the unknown cause of a feature flag whose default differs between environments, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Spring Boot conventions in projects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx; retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for JunctionFernSnapshotStore events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionOspreyJobCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/junction/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.junctionorbitsyncflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctionorbitsyncflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctionorbitsyncflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionOrbitSyncFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50148\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign JunctionOrbitSyncFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, JunctionRainfallDBStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de GraphQL. Lee el flujo actual y dime si ownership, cancelación y orden son seguros; solo necesito el análisis.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con GraphQL\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a JunctionRainfallDBStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Why is JunctionDeltaCanvasService stalling?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a misleading timeout name used in five packages in JunctionCoralUploadStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: Two asks around JunctionFlintTimelineCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for JunctionFlintTimelineCoordinator; (2) also add the visible loading and offline states. Retain the existing cli flags and exit codes, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50157: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionLedgerGateCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for JunctionLedgerGateCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, JunctionCraneWorkspaceStore has shown a misleading timeout name used in five packages; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing GraphQL deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionCraneWorkspaceStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace JunctionBirchMigratorService's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionAtlasSearchCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionAcornWidgetStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/junction/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.junctionharborindexflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctionharborindexflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctionharborindexflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionHarborIndexFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50112\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign JunctionHarborIndexFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: projects/junction/engine/render/atlas.cpp has grown through several launches, and JunctionCoralUploadService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionCoralUploadService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: # projects/junction/lib/codec/frame.cc\n[worker.junctioncinderauthflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctioncinderauthflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctioncinderauthflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionCinderAuthFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50130\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign JunctionCinderAuthFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does JunctionVelaDrawerStore propagate cancellation through the GraphQL boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionBasilRunnerCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionSableParserCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around JunctionCloudReconcilerStore survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionCloudReconcilerStore\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Drop JunctionSpruceDaemonService's unused import","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionNimbusFormCoordinator needs a paired pass: change JunctionNimbusFormCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf as the source of truth, preserve the GraphQL contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.22,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for JunctionBeaconStoreStore across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the JunctionCloudReconcilerService validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: Ticket OPS-50127: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionRavenSessionFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for JunctionRavenSessionFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new JunctionMapleQueueStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For JunctionCinderAuthCoordinator, change JunctionCinderAuthCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/junction/engine/render/atlas.cpp, stay with Spring Boot, and retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The public surface of JunctionSlateEditorService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionSlateEditorService\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does JunctionGarnetModalStore own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionMarbleTokenService needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by Kafka; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the JunctionHarborIndexStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionHarborIndexStore\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the JunctionMicaProfileStore migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The JunctionOrbitSyncStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue の JunctionWrenExportFlow で、GraphQL の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- GraphQL を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は JunctionWrenExportFlow のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Staging: The destination for JunctionAcornWidgetService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs to that target. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionAcornWidgetService\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionAcornWidgetFlow's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: For JunctionGarnetModalCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/junction/src/sync/reconcile.ts; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/junction/src/sync/reconcile.ts, stay with Cloudflare Workers, and retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-50150\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionCoralUploadCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise JunctionCoralUploadCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/junction/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Restructure JunctionQuartzPlayerCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"JunctionNovaPickerCoordinator: polish, then correct","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex b/projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n+++ b/projects/junction/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is JunctionEmberRelayFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50111: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionRainfallDBFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged JunctionRainfallDBFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give JunctionNimbusFormStore a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: For JunctionSpruceDaemonCoordinator, separate JunctionSpruceDaemonCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, correct the known stale timeout beside it. Work from projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py, stay with Kotlin coroutines, and retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py, JunctionQuartzPlayerService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Kotlin coroutines. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Kotlin coroutines\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a JunctionQuartzPlayerService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con Kotlin coroutines alrededor de JunctionQuartzPlayerService.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 50122: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Kafka\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] JunctionSableParserFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] JunctionSableParserFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nFind the source of this JunctionSableParserFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/junction/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does JunctionSpruceDaemonStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dedupe JunctionAsterWebhookService's cursor conversion","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the JunctionPrismCacheStore validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: The next client release depends on a new JunctionFernSnapshotService capability in projects/junction/internal/auth/refresh.go, with GraphQL already chosen by the platform group. Implement the endpoint and durable cursor, enforce tenant authorization and idempotency, emit useful spans, cap work per request, and include focused tests for retries, cancellation, and malformed cursors.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing GraphQL deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionFernSnapshotService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionPrismCacheCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/junction/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: junctionnovapickerflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/junction/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt:217:18\n   4: junctionnovapickerflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nFind the source of this JunctionNovaPickerFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: Unify the JunctionLumenChartService validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Correct the JunctionCraneWorkspaceService flag default","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for JunctionWillowCodecStore events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py has grown through several launches, and JunctionCopperBridgeStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing Kotlin coroutines deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionCopperBridgeStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nThe target structure is settled; carry out the behavior-preserving edits rather than writing another strategy.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'JunctionAtlasSearchFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx:144: error: -[JunctionAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionAtlasSearchFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Use the UI evidence to complete JunctionAtlasSearchFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: JunctionPineMetricsStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside JunctionPineMetricsStore\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n\nThe relevant code crosses logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, JunctionKiteSchedulerStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionSlateEditorFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does JunctionAmberFilterStore propagate cancellation through the Kafka boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare JunctionCinderAuthService's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Animate the JunctionNimbusFormService drawer","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-50116\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionCraneWorkspaceFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current JunctionCraneWorkspaceFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-50142: finish the compact JunctionMarbleTokenFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/junction/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nFramework: Kafka\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete JunctionMarbleTokenFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: diff --git a/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is JunctionFernSnapshotCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/junction/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nfinal class JunctionAcornWidgetCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about JunctionAcornWidgetCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/junction/internal/auth/refresh.go, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionBeaconStoreCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: JunctionCedarPolicyStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/junction/engine/render/atlas.cpp, not an open-ended failure investigation. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionCedarPolicyStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged JunctionAsterWebhookStore for a read-only pass because its Cloudflare Workers boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Cloudflare Workers operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionMapleQueueCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf and tell me whether JunctionWillowCodecService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does JunctionSlateEditorStore propagate cancellation through the Spring Boot boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'JunctionBeaconStoreFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[JunctionBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/junction/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:144: error: -[JunctionBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[JunctionBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring JunctionBeaconStoreFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did JunctionOspreyJobService's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: Incident timeline — INC-50132\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionBirchMigratorFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise JunctionBirchMigratorFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-50134: finish the compact JunctionBasilRunnerFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/junction/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nFramework: Cloudflare Workers\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring JunctionBasilRunnerFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50133: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionSpruceDaemonFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess JunctionSpruceDaemonFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for JunctionMapleQueueService across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the JunctionPrismCacheService setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind JunctionFrostPanelFlow's Cloudflare Workers choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended JunctionJuniperCLIStore independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Kotlin coroutines operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe target structure is settled; carry out the behavior-preserving edits rather than writing another strategy.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter JunctionCedarPolicyFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × JunctionCedarPolicyFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=50110 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=50110 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=50110 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=50110 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nFind the source of this JunctionCedarPolicyFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace JunctionCinderAuthStore's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The JunctionMarbleTokenStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a JunctionDriftConsoleStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/junction/internal/auth/refresh.go:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: junctionnimbusformflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/junction/internal/auth/refresh.go:217:18\n   4: junctionnimbusformflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nDetermine why JunctionNimbusFormFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of JunctionLedgerGateService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/junction/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-50140\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionKiteSchedulerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the JunctionKiteSchedulerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/junction/services/ledger/replay.go hat JunctionRainfallDBService ein sporadisches Problem im GraphQL-Ablauf. Vervollständige Responsive Layout, Empty- und Retry-State, Tastaturfokus, Dark Mode und Reduced Motion.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- GraphQL weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf JunctionRainfallDBService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um JunctionRainfallDBService mit GraphQL kompatibel.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"JunctionCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: ship, then assess","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a JunctionMosaicGridStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move JunctionOrbitSyncService from the legacy store to Kotlin coroutines. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: UI ticket DES-50128: finish the compact JunctionFlintTimelineFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/junction/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nFramework: Kotlin coroutines\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring JunctionFlintTimelineFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: Incident timeline — INC-50118\n\n08:02 deploy JunctionOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible JunctionOpalRouterFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"JunctionIrisBatchCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: # projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.junctiondeltacanvasflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.junctiondeltacanvasflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.junctiondeltacanvasflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.JunctionDeltaCanvasFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-50123\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/junction/ml/pipeline/features.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: projects/junction/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte has grown through several launches, and JunctionPineMetricsService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- retain the existing CLI flags and exit codes\n- stay compatible with the existing Cloudflare Workers deployment\n- keep the work scoped to JunctionPineMetricsService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans logistics, WebAssembly, MySQL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new JunctionQuartzPlayerStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let JunctionLedgerGateFlow adopt Kafka with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether JunctionAtlasSearchService's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/junction/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-50115: retire the legacy replay path for JunctionCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess JunctionCloudReconcilerFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split JunctionSableParserStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: The minimum supported Cloudflare Workers version in projects/junction/src/sync/reconcile.ts is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/junction/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nWire JunctionWillowCodecFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_51155'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_51155'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDetermine why KeystoneBirchMigratorCoordinator produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneSummitProxyCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/keystone/engine/render/atlas.cpp and tell me whether KeystoneDeltaCanvasService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives in KeystoneLumenChartStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/keystone/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nfinal class KeystoneFlintTimelineCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about KeystoneFlintTimelineCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneOspreyJobCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneAsterWebhookCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around KeystoneBasilRunnerService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneBasilRunnerService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for KeystonePrismCacheStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneDeltaCanvasCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about KeystoneBirchMigratorService, but the current prose in projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt only describes the happy path. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneBirchMigratorService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move KeystoneAmberFilterService behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-51159: finish the compact KeystoneWillowCodecCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/cmd/exporter/main.py\nFramework: FastAPI\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete KeystoneWillowCodecCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneBirchMigratorStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/keystone/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could KeystoneFernSnapshotService migrate incrementally?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs has grown through several launches, and KeystoneEmberRelayService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneEmberRelayService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up KeystoneMarbleTokenCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, which follows gRPC conventions and currently suffers from out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Stream KeystoneOrbitSyncService's audit events","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract KeystoneAcornWidgetService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: # projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.keystoneorbitsyncflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystoneorbitsyncflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystoneorbitsyncflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneOrbitSyncFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51121\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Make the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: # projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.keystonecloudreconcilerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonecloudreconcilerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonecloudreconcilerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneCloudReconcilerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51138\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign KeystoneCloudReconcilerFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: KeystoneKiteSchedulerService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneKiteSchedulerService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve KeystoneCopperBridgeService, assess whether a deadlock that appears only during shutdown is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does KeystoneCinderAuthStore propagate cancellation through the Room boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through KeystoneMarbleTokenService's usage.svelte","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence KeystoneJuniperCLIService's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document KeystoneCoralUploadStore's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: Two asks around KeystoneQuartzPlayerCoordinator: (1) separate KeystoneQuartzPlayerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: The public surface of KeystoneFlintTimelineService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneFlintTimelineService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for KeystoneKiteSchedulerCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: produce a consumer guide for KeystoneKiteSchedulerCoordinator\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/keystone/config/staging.toml\n- platform constraint: Room\n- known complication: a feature flag whose default differs between environments\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the KeystoneBeaconStoreStore changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For KeystoneAcornWidgetCoordinator, change KeystoneAcornWidgetCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/keystone/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, stay with gRPC, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneOpalRouterCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating a deadlock that appears only during shutdown in KeystoneRainfallDBStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneBeaconStoreCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the KeystoneLedgerGateService migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: # projects/keystone/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.keystonepinemetricsflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonepinemetricsflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonepinemetricsflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystonePineMetricsFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51132\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign KeystonePineMetricsFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: projects/keystone/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte 里的 KeystoneHarborIndexService 最近在 gRPC 流程中出现间歇性问题。 原因已经明确：只把 staging timeout 从 15 秒改成 30 秒，并调整对应 assertion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 gRPC\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 KeystoneHarborIndexService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/keystone/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue into independently owned modules while KeystoneGarnetModalService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing KeystoneAtlasSearchStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneIrisBatchCoordinator: polish, then assess","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51120: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneAmberFilterFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for KeystoneAmberFilterFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For KeystoneSlateEditorCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for KeystoneSlateEditorCoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs, stay with Room, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sketch the KeystoneVelaDrawerService migration","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded KeystoneRavenSessionStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-51143: finish the compact KeystoneOspreyJobFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/config/staging.toml\nFramework: Room\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible KeystoneOspreyJobFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51110: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneEchoRegistryFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise KeystoneEchoRegistryFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Animate the KeystoneCedarPolicyService drawer","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneFrostPanelCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/keystone/services/ledger/replay.go, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/keystone/services/ledger/replay.go as the source of truth, preserve the Swift 6 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to KeystoneCopperBridgeStore rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-51131\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneJuniperCLIFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged KeystoneJuniperCLIFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: // projects/keystone/internal/auth/refresh.go\nfinal class KeystoneMapleQueueFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about KeystoneMapleQueueFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCoralUploadCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged KeystoneKiteSchedulerStore for a read-only pass because its Room boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current Room operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneAtlasSearchService leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/keystone/cmd/exporter/main.py by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is KeystoneAmberFilterStore safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneMoonlitSDKCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/keystone/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.keystonemicaprofilecoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonemicaprofilecoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonemicaprofilecoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneMicaProfileCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51152\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/keystone/internal/auth/refresh.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: Ticket OPS-51116: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise KeystoneSummitProxyFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneWillowCodecFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/keystone/ml/pipeline/features.py and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, KeystoneMicaProfileStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: Ticket OPS-51156: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneSpruceDaemonCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nWire KeystoneSpruceDaemonCoordinator's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex: remove the obsolete KeystoneOpalRouterService import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-51135: finish the compact KeystoneHarborIndexFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nFramework: gRPC\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete KeystoneHarborIndexFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move KeystoneGarnetModalStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/keystone/engine/render/atlas.cpp b/projects/keystone/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/keystone/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n+++ b/projects/keystone/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure KeystoneDeltaCanvasFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of KeystoneWillowCodecService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/keystone/ml/pipeline/features.py. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current FastAPI operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring KeystoneFlintTimelineStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The destination for KeystoneLumenChartService is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift to that target. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneLumenChartService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCopperBridgeCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneSableParserCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: The destination for KeystoneEmberRelayStore is broadly agreed; the missing piece is a reversible route from projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs to that target. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneEmberRelayStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around KeystonePineMetricsCoordinator: (1) finish KeystonePineMetricsCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'KeystoneMoonlitSDKFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[KeystoneMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs:144: error: -[KeystoneMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[KeystoneMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring KeystoneMoonlitSDKFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat KeystoneFrostPanelStore","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let KeystoneSableParserService adopt gRPC with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through KeystoneFernSnapshotStore's main.py","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does KeystoneQuartzPlayerService preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach KeystoneCinderAuthFlow to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to KeystoneLumenChartFlow rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/keystone/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class KeystoneFrostPanelFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit KeystoneFrostPanelFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended KeystoneEchoRegistryStore independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nThe individual edits look tiny, but the semantic cleanup spans the repository and must preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended KeystoneSpruceDaemonService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current OpenTelemetry operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneRainfallDBService's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/keystone/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneSlateEditorService flakes under UTC","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=keystonemosaicgridflow pod=keystonemosaicgridflow-7cf8 request_id=51117 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=keystonemosaicgridflow request_id=51117 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nReconstruct the KeystoneMosaicGridFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneNovaPickerCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-51119\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneIrisBatchFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged KeystoneIrisBatchFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: // projects/keystone/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nfinal class KeystoneDriftConsoleFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate KeystoneDriftConsoleFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zentriere das KeystoneIrisBatchStore-Modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"KeystonePrismCacheCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: # projects/keystone/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.keystonebasilrunnercoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonebasilrunnercoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonebasilrunnercoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneBasilRunnerCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51157\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/keystone/services/ledger/replay.go. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: # projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n[worker.keystoneacornwidgetflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystoneacornwidgetflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystoneacornwidgetflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneAcornWidgetFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51125\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneAtlasSearchCoordinator: diagnose, then assess","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for KeystoneEchoRegistryCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate KeystoneEchoRegistryCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/keystone/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n- platform constraint: gRPC\n- known complication: a misleading timeout name used in five packages\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-51149: finish the compact KeystoneNimbusFormFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/ml/pipeline/features.py\nFramework: FastAPI\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible KeystoneNimbusFormFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does KeystoneSableParserStore propagate cancellation through the gRPC boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around KeystoneFernSnapshotCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of a feature flag whose default differs between environments; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around KeystoneVelaDrawerStore survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneVelaDrawerStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded KeystoneCloudReconcilerService export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of KeystoneRavenSessionService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/keystone/ml/pipeline/features.py recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Style KeystonePineMetricsStore's offline state","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de KeystoneFrostPanelService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51154: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneLumenChartCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current KeystoneLumenChartCoordinator behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: UI ticket DES-51133: finish the compact KeystoneCedarPolicyFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nFramework: Room\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring KeystoneCedarPolicyFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneNovaPickerStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCedarPolicyCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate KeystoneCedarPolicyCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/keystone/config/staging.toml as the source of truth, preserve the Room contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the KeystoneSlateEditorStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: UI ticket DES-51141: finish the compact KeystoneOpalRouterFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nFramework: OpenTelemetry\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete KeystoneOpalRouterFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneSpruceDaemonFlow needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by OpenTelemetry; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind KeystoneTideWorkerStore's gRPC choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneOrbitSyncCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneNimbusFormCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneOrbitSyncStore's PrivacyPane.tsx needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/keystone/lib/codec/frame.cc\nfinal class KeystoneCopperBridgeFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about KeystoneCopperBridgeFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged KeystoneSummitProxyStore for a read-only pass because its OpenTelemetry boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current OpenTelemetry operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51118: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current KeystoneAtlasSearchFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for KeystoneNovaPickerService events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCoralUploadService's staging.toml needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The KeystoneMicaProfileFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match KeystoneLedgerGateStore's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate KeystonePrismCacheFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneRavenSessionFlow's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/keystone/src/sync/reconcile.ts value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneHarborIndexCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for KeystoneTideWorkerService, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneLedgerGateCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate KeystoneLedgerGateCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/keystone/src/sync/reconcile.ts as the source of truth, preserve the gRPC contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/keystone/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx hat KeystoneDriftConsoleService ein sporadisches Problem im OpenTelemetry-Ablauf. Die Ursache ist klar: Ändere nur das Staging-Timeout von 15 auf 30 Sekunden und passe die Assertion an.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- OpenTelemetry weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf KeystoneDriftConsoleService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um KeystoneDriftConsoleService mit OpenTelemetry kompatibel.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/keystone/lib/codec/frame.cc; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: # projects/keystone/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.keystonetideworkerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonetideworkerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonetideworkerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneTideWorkerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51140\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/keystone/src/sync/reconcile.ts and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: The KeystoneEmberRelayFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneAmberFilterCoordinator: restructure, then correct","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is KeystoneBeaconStoreService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For KeystoneJuniperCLICoordinator, produce a consumer guide for KeystoneJuniperCLICoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, stay with OpenTelemetry, and keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, KeystoneDriftConsoleStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de OpenTelemetry. Sigue queue, scheduler y cancelación, compara hipótesis y encuentra la causa antes de proponer cambios.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con OpenTelemetry\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a KeystoneDriftConsoleStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con OpenTelemetry alrededor de KeystoneDriftConsoleStore.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"projects/keystone/packages/api/openapi.yaml 里的 KeystoneOspreyJobStore 最近在 Room 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请拆分职责并去掉重复，同时保持 API、wire value、顺序和可观察行为不变。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Room\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 KeystoneOspreyJobStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Where did KeystoneCedarPolicyStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin KeystoneMosaicGridService's Swift dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-51115\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneMarbleTokenFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFind the source of this KeystoneMarbleTokenFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/keystone/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/keystone/packages/api/openapi.yaml:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: keystonecinderauthcoordinator::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/keystone/packages/api/openapi.yaml:217:18\n   4: keystonecinderauthcoordinator::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Reconstruct the KeystoneCinderAuthCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: # projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n[worker.keystonewrenexportflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonewrenexportflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonewrenexportflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneWrenExportFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51124\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does KeystoneMoonlitSDKStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: // projects/keystone/cmd/exporter/main.py\nfinal class KeystoneCraneWorkspaceFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit KeystoneCraneWorkspaceFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: projects/keystone/infra/modules/edge/main.tf has grown through several launches, and KeystoneMapleQueueStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneMapleQueueStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe individual edits look tiny, but the semantic cleanup spans the repository and must preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/keystone/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure KeystoneEmberRelayCoordinator so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: diff --git a/projects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/keystone/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure KeystoneSlateEditorFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for KeystoneDeltaCanvasStore events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: The KeystoneBasilRunnerFlow empty state in projects/keystone/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up KeystoneMapleQueueCoordinator. First, produce a consumer guide for KeystoneMapleQueueCoordinator. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/keystone/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, which follows Swift 6 conventions and currently suffers from cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary. Keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for KeystoneCloudReconcilerStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect KeystoneWillowCodecStore to outgrow its current FastAPI arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneWillowCodecStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check KeystonePineMetricsService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneTideWorkerCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-51123\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneCoralUploadFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for KeystoneCoralUploadFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51126: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneQuartzPlayerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for KeystoneQuartzPlayerFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneGarnetModalCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: Ticket OPS-51114: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneVelaDrawerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for KeystoneVelaDrawerFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new KeystoneCraneWorkspaceService adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How should KeystoneSummitProxyService be decomposed?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give KeystoneAsterWebhookService's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneRainfallDBCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: Incident timeline — INC-51113\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneKiteSchedulerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Turn the material above into a concise KeystoneKiteSchedulerFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'KeystoneRainfallDBFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[KeystoneRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/keystone/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift:144: error: -[KeystoneRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[KeystoneRainfallDBFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible KeystoneRainfallDBFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: PM is preparing the KeystoneEchoRegistryService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneEchoRegistryService\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the KeystoneAcornWidgetStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex の KeystoneFlintTimelineFlow で、OpenTelemetry の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 原因は判明済みです。staging timeout だけを 15 秒から 30 秒へ変え、対応する assertion を直してください。\n\n制約:\n- OpenTelemetry を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は KeystoneFlintTimelineFlow のみ","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Console: diff --git a/projects/keystone/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/keystone/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/keystone/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/keystone/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit KeystoneLedgerGateFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does KeystoneCraneWorkspaceStore propagate cancellation through the FastAPI boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: // projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nfinal class KeystoneSableParserFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Split KeystoneSableParserFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"The KeystoneMoonlitSDKService feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_51122'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_51122'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDeliver the KeystoneBeaconStoreFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneWrenExportCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/keystone/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/keystone/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift as the source of truth, preserve the FastAPI contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/keystone/config/staging.toml, KeystoneCinderAuthService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Room. Redacta una guía para consumidores con contrato, errores, retry y un ejemplo copiable; no cambies el handler.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Room\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a KeystoneCinderAuthService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con Room alrededor de KeystoneCinderAuthService.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Repository: # projects/keystone/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.keystonefernsnapshotflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.keystonefernsnapshotflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.keystonefernsnapshotflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.KeystoneFernSnapshotFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-51129\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Align KeystoneFernSnapshotFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: Incident timeline — INC-51137\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneAsterWebhookFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Turn the material above into a concise KeystoneAsterWebhookFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneDriftConsoleCoordinator is blocking the next release because stale cursors when a page is resumed. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change KeystoneDriftConsoleCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing OpenTelemetry conventions in projects/keystone/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex; keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: The behavior of KeystoneMapleQueueService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/keystone/internal/auth/refresh.go. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses collaboration, C++, Next.js. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: KeystoneMarbleTokenStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, not an open-ended failure investigation. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneMarbleTokenStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe cause and exact value change are already known, so keep this as a contained correction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.25,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: Incident timeline — INC-51150\n\n08:02 deploy KeystoneRavenSessionCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nReconstruct the KeystoneRavenSessionCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does KeystoneWrenExportStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin KeystoneJuniperCLIStore's OpenTelemetry dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give KeystoneOpalRouterStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, o KeystoneHarborIndexStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de gRPC. Leia o fluxo atual e avalie ownership, cancelamento e ordem; preciso apenas da análise.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com gRPC\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao KeystoneHarborIndexStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/keystone/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched. Although each edit is small, the semantic rename spans the whole repository.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check KeystoneWrenExportService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/keystone/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class KeystoneGarnetModalFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate KeystoneGarnetModalFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the KeystoneQuartzPlayerStore setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current KeystoneMosaicGridStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside KeystoneMosaicGridStore\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n\nThis repository spans collaboration, C++, Next.js; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCloudReconcilerCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-51142: retire the legacy replay path for KeystoneNovaPickerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the KeystoneNovaPickerFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let KeystoneBasilRunnerStore adopt Swift 6 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect KeystoneMicaProfileService to outgrow its current Swift 6 arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to KeystoneMicaProfileService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this collaboration, C++, Next.js monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneVelaDrawerCoordinator is blocking the next release because a deadlock that appears only during shutdown. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change KeystoneVelaDrawerCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing FastAPI conventions in projects/keystone/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; keep public behavior and serialized data unchanged. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Centre la modale KeystoneIrisBatchService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: projects/keystone/config/staging.toml の KeystoneOspreyJobService で、Room の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- Room を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は KeystoneOspreyJobService のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"KeystoneMosaicGridCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py: remove the obsolete LongbowPineMetricsFlow import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMoonlitSDKCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: Check LongbowEmberRelayService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve LongbowMarbleTokenStore, assess whether an accessibility label that reads the internal enum is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: LongbowHarborIndexStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Playwright deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowHarborIndexStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/longbow/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: projects/longbow/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue 里的 LongbowAmberFilterStore 最近在 Playwright 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Playwright\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 LongbowAmberFilterStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/longbow/crates/index/src/segment.rs and tell me whether LongbowJuniperCLIFlow can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52139: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowSummitProxyFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged LongbowSummitProxyFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMarbleTokenCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: // projects/longbow/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nfinal class LongbowBasilRunnerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure LongbowBasilRunnerFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMapleQueueCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, LongbowMarbleTokenService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for LongbowCinderAuthStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for LongbowCraneWorkspaceCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change LongbowCraneWorkspaceCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/longbow/lib/codec/frame.cc\n- platform constraint: Core Data\n- known complication: a deadlock that appears only during shutdown\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Leave generated files and vendored code alone; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.4,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for LongbowNovaPickerCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py\n- platform constraint: Redis Streams\n- known complication: a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Leave generated files and vendored code alone; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAtlasSearchService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported React 19 version in projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn LongbowWrenExportStore's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql now contains LongbowCedarPolicyStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, LongbowCloudReconcilerStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de React 19. Sigue queue, scheduler y cancelación, compara hipótesis y encuentra la causa antes de proponer cambios.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con React 19\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a LongbowCloudReconcilerStore","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Currently: # projects/longbow/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n[worker.longbowbirchmigratorflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbowbirchmigratorflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbowbirchmigratorflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowBirchMigratorFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52128\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign LongbowBirchMigratorFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match LongbowMoonlitSDKStore's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'LongbowLedgerGateCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowLedgerGateCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue:144: error: -[LongbowLedgerGateCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowLedgerGateCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Find the source of this LongbowLedgerGateCoordinator symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"LongbowWrenExportCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the LongbowRavenSessionService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: This should remain a deliberately small patch: LongbowRainfallDBService has one known configuration mistake in projects/longbow/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Core Data deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowRainfallDBService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for LongbowBeaconStoreStore across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for LongbowWrenExportService across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_52133'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_52133'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDetermine why LongbowEchoRegistryFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split LongbowOpalRouterService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give LongbowCinderAuthService a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: // projects/longbow/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nfinal class LongbowFrostPanelCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about LongbowFrostPanelCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged LongbowPineMetricsService for a read-only pass because its Redis Streams boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Redis Streams operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Describe LongbowBirchMigratorService's error envelope","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give LongbowLedgerGateStore's detail pane a sticky action bar, fluid type at narrow widths, and a keyboard-safe scroll region that still works at 200% zoom.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up LongbowOpalRouterCoordinator. First, finish LongbowOpalRouterCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/longbow/crates/index/src/segment.rs, which follows Terraform conventions and currently suffers from an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives. Leave generated files and vendored code alone.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace LongbowBirchMigratorStore's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate LongbowBeaconStoreService's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Decouple LongbowPrismCacheService's storage policy","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for LongbowFrostPanelStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowFernSnapshotFlow has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about LongbowAsterWebhookService, but the current prose in projects/longbow/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Redis Streams deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowAsterWebhookService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of LongbowCopperBridgeStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Terraform operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nProduce durable prose rather than a code assessment or implementation change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/longbow/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n[worker.longboworbitsyncflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longboworbitsyncflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longboworbitsyncflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowOrbitSyncFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52144\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/longbow/crates/index/src/segment.rs. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For LongbowWillowCodecCoordinator, find the unknown cause of lost focus when the drawer animation finishes; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/longbow/lib/codec/frame.cc, stay with Core Data, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: The LongbowRainfallDBStore surface in projects/longbow/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52155: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowPineMetricsCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible LongbowPineMetricsCoordinator rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited LongbowOpalRouterStore and need a careful read of projects/longbow/crates/index/src/segment.rs before I can sign off on the next release. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Terraform deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowOpalRouterStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nReturn an assessment of the existing artifact; only quote enough to make the walkthrough understandable.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowIrisBatchCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let LongbowQuartzPlayerService adopt Terraform with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml b/projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n+++ b/projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit LongbowCopperBridgeCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowRavenSessionCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: Ticket OPS-52111: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowCloudReconcilerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current LongbowCloudReconcilerFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'LongbowRavenSessionFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowRavenSessionFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go:144: error: -[LongbowRavenSessionFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowRavenSessionFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring LongbowRavenSessionFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowSummitProxyCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowEmberRelayStore leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-52124\n\n08:02 deploy LongbowFlintTimelineFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise LongbowFlintTimelineFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de LongbowDeltaCanvasService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 52112: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Core Data\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] LongbowCraneWorkspaceFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] LongbowCraneWorkspaceFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nDeliver the LongbowCraneWorkspaceFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect LongbowJuniperCLIService to outgrow its current Terraform arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Terraform deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowJuniperCLIService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowCoralUploadCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: Architect a gradual ownership transfer for LongbowRainfallDBFlow across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/longbow/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/longbow/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/longbow/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/longbow/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nDeliver the LongbowJuniperCLICoordinator server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does LongbowWillowCodecService own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52145: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowBeaconStoreFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Using this as the starting evidence, propose a staged LongbowBeaconStoreFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Is LongbowMoonlitSDKService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: # projects/longbow/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.longbownovapickerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbownovapickerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbownovapickerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowNovaPickerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52115\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/longbow/ml/pipeline/features.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: # projects/longbow/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.longbowwillowcodecflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbowwillowcodecflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbowwillowcodecflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowWillowCodecFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52132\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/longbow/engine/render/atlas.cpp. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the LongbowFlintTimelineStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does LongbowQuartzPlayerStore propagate cancellation through the Terraform boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous? I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: diff --git a/projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate LongbowMicaProfileFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve LongbowMosaicGridService, assess whether an accessibility label that reads the internal enum is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: What is the safest way to split projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml into independently owned modules while LongbowSummitProxyService's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/longbow/ml/pipeline/features.py 里的 LongbowMapleQueueService 最近在 Redis Streams 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请拆分职责并去掉重复，同时保持 API、wire value、顺序和可观察行为不变。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Redis Streams\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 LongbowMapleQueueService","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Draft LongbowMicaProfileService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-52158: finish the compact LongbowHarborIndexCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go\nFramework: Playwright\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete LongbowHarborIndexCoordinator's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: // projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nfinal class LongbowCedarPolicyCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about LongbowCedarPolicyCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'LongbowDeltaCanvasFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowDeltaCanvasFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml:144: error: -[LongbowDeltaCanvasFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowDeltaCanvasFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete LongbowDeltaCanvasFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_52131'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_52131'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nWire LongbowEmberRelayFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowEmberRelayCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate LongbowEmberRelayCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte as the source of truth, preserve the React 19 contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The API work is done; what remains for LongbowFrostPanelService is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowFrostPanelService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the LongbowEchoRegistryStore setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: Test Suite 'LongbowMapleQueueFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/ml/pipeline/features.py:144: error: -[LongbowMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowMapleQueueFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring LongbowMapleQueueFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowQuartzPlayerCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a LongbowDriftConsoleStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move LongbowSummitProxyStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: Test Suite 'LongbowSpruceDaemonFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/config/staging.toml:144: error: -[LongbowSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowSpruceDaemonFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Bring LongbowSpruceDaemonFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-52136: finish the compact LongbowKiteSchedulerFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nFramework: React 19\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible LongbowKiteSchedulerFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could LongbowCedarPolicyFlow show the active React 19 sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: The behavior of LongbowHarborIndexService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/longbow/infra/modules/edge/main.tf. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Playwright operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for LongbowOrbitSyncStore events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Warum hängt LongbowDeltaCanvasStore?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: LongbowTideWorkerService has one known configuration mistake in projects/longbow/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Playwright deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowTideWorkerService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMicaProfileCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate LongbowMicaProfileCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/longbow/ml/pipeline/features.py as the source of truth, preserve the Redis Streams contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: Ticket OPS-52137: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowVelaDrawerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. From this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for LongbowVelaDrawerFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"# projects/longbow/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.longbowgarnetmodalflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbowgarnetmodalflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbowgarnetmodalflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowGarnetModalFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52120\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/longbow/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowSableParserCoordinator: polish, then assess","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.61,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowIrisBatchStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/longbow/engine/render/atlas.cpp value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowNimbusFormService's frame.cc needs better comments","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowKiteSchedulerService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around LongbowLumenChartCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of a feature flag whose default differs between environments; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAcornWidgetCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: // projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go\nfinal class LongbowMarbleTokenFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit LongbowMarbleTokenFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Enforce LongbowEchoRegistryService's idempotency key","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowBirchMigratorCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for LongbowBirchMigratorCoordinator, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go as the source of truth, preserve the Playwright contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.51,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Billing: Before touching projects/longbow/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the LongbowCopperBridgeService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowCopperBridgeService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/longbow/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt hat LongbowCloudReconcilerService ein sporadisches Problem im React 19-Ablauf. Lies den aktuellen Ablauf und bewerte Ownership, Abbruch und Reihenfolge; ich brauche nur die Analyse.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- React 19 weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf LongbowCloudReconcilerService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um LongbowCloudReconcilerService mit React 19 kompatibel.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"LongbowKiteSchedulerStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/longbow/src/sync/reconcile.ts value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around LongbowDriftConsoleService now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: # projects/longbow/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n[worker.longbowtideworkerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbowtideworkerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbowtideworkerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowTideWorkerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52113\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Align LongbowTideWorkerFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Release verification found a single stale LongbowCraneWorkspaceStore value; the cause, desired value, and affected assertion are already agreed. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Core Data operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'LongbowWrenExportFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex:144: error: -[LongbowWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowWrenExportFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring LongbowWrenExportFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-52116\n\n08:02 deploy LongbowOspreyJobFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible LongbowOspreyJobFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-52126\n\n08:02 deploy LongbowCinderAuthFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the LongbowCinderAuthFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Corrija o timeout de LongbowLumenChartService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new LongbowVelaDrawerService adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring LongbowPineMetricsStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52151: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowSlateEditorCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise LongbowSlateEditorCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: Test Suite 'LongbowMoonlitSDKFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:144: error: -[LongbowMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowMoonlitSDKFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Finish the visible LongbowMoonlitSDKFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMosaicGridCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowPrismCacheCoordinator: ship, then assess","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new LongbowAtlasSearchStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits. I want your judgment and walkthrough, not new documentation.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52110: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowAsterWebhookFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess LongbowAsterWebhookFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/longbow/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nfinal class LongbowOpalRouterFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit LongbowOpalRouterFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Persist LongbowLedgerGateFlow delivery attempts in projects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go, claim them safely across workers, and make duplicate webhook receipts return the original accepted result.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around LongbowFlintTimelineCoordinator: (1) finish LongbowFlintTimelineCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for LongbowOrbitSyncService, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: Release engineering needs a LongbowJuniperCLIStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract LongbowOspreyJobService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAsterWebhookCoordinator is blocking the next release because cancellation being swallowed at the repository boundary. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: lay out a staged migration for LongbowAsterWebhookCoordinator, and consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use the existing Redis Streams conventions in projects/longbow/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift; leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of LongbowFernSnapshotService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Core Data operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAmberFilterCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The public surface of LongbowAsterWebhookStore is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/longbow/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowAsterWebhookStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: Ticket OPS-52117: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowPrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the LongbowPrismCacheFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For LongbowCinderAuthCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/longbow/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql, stay with React 19, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell LongbowSableParserStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for LongbowCoralUploadService events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the LongbowWillowCodecStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 52127: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Core Data\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] LongbowLumenChartFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] LongbowLumenChartFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nDetermine why LongbowLumenChartFlow produces this result. Trace ordering, cancellation, shared state, and scheduler behavior; identify the root cause before suggesting a patch.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check LongbowNovaPickerService's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowTideWorkerCoordinator is blocking the next release because out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change LongbowTideWorkerCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Playwright conventions in projects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go; leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the LongbowSpruceDaemonService validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: projects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go の LongbowAmberFilterService で、Playwright の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 責務を分離して重複をなくし、API、wire value、順序、観測可能な動作は変えないでください。\n\n制約:\n- Playwright を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は LongbowAmberFilterService のみ","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"LongbowVelaDrawerCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: Two deliverables are holding up LongbowCloudReconcilerCoordinator. First, find the unknown cause of a feature flag whose default differs between environments. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, which follows React 19 conventions and currently suffers from a feature flag whose default differs between environments. Leave generated files and vendored code alone.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Animate the LongbowBasilRunnerStore drawer","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: Compare LongbowGarnetModalService's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.longbowsableparserflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.longbowsableparserflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.longbowsableparserflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.LongbowSableParserFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-52118\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowOspreyJobCoordinator: correct, then document","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.22,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace LongbowBasilRunnerService's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Outline a safer LongbowFlintTimelineService cutover","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft LongbowRavenSessionStore's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: PM is preparing the LongbowCraneWorkspaceService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowCraneWorkspaceService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn LongbowCopperBridgeFlow's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current LongbowCedarPolicyService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowCedarPolicyService\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The LongbowVelaDrawerStore surface in projects/longbow/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: // projects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class LongbowAtlasSearchFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about LongbowAtlasSearchFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect LongbowPrismCacheStore to outgrow its current Core Data arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing Core Data deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowPrismCacheStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around LongbowFernSnapshotStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowOrbitSyncCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, LongbowSlateEditorService has shown a feature flag whose default differs between environments; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- stay compatible with the existing React 19 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to LongbowSlateEditorService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses billing, Elixir, Android. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAcornWidgetStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/longbow/internal/auth/refresh.go value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: Ticket OPS-52140: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowMosaicGridFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess LongbowMosaicGridFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py, o LongbowMapleQueueStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Redis Streams. Separe responsabilidades e remova duplicação sem mudar API, wire values, ordem ou comportamento observável.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Redis Streams\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao LongbowMapleQueueStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Trace LongbowGarnetModalStore's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-52148: finish the compact LongbowAcornWidgetFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/longbow/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nFramework: Playwright\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible LongbowAcornWidgetFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: Ticket OPS-52149: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowQuartzPlayerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible LongbowQuartzPlayerFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around LongbowBasilRunnerCoordinator: (1) separate LongbowBasilRunnerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: The public surface of LongbowTideWorkerStore is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowTideWorkerStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowBeaconStoreCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate LongbowSlateEditorStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove LongbowSableParserService's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: Two asks around LongbowEchoRegistryCoordinator: (1) separate LongbowEchoRegistryCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Leave generated files and vendored code alone, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For LongbowSpruceDaemonCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for LongbowSpruceDaemonCoordinator; once that is complete, also add the visible loading and offline states. Work from projects/longbow/packages/api/openapi.yaml, stay with Terraform, and leave generated files and vendored code alone. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowAtlasSearchCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: The LongbowFrostPanelFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowGarnetModalCoordinator: ship, then assess","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/longbow/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx b/projects/longbow/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/longbow/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n+++ b/projects/longbow/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is LongbowRainfallDBCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/longbow/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nfinal class LongbowCoralUploadFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate LongbowCoralUploadFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowKiteSchedulerCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: // projects/longbow/lib/codec/frame.cc\nfinal class LongbowNimbusFormFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate LongbowNimbusFormFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowMosaicGridStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-52152: retire the legacy replay path for LongbowFernSnapshotCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess LongbowFernSnapshotCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowLumenChartStore est-il sûr ?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-52142\n\n08:02 deploy LongbowIrisBatchFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged LongbowIrisBatchFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of LongbowNovaPickerStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/longbow/cmd/exporter/main.py. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n- retain the current Redis Streams operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans billing, Elixir, Android; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nProduce durable prose rather than a code assessment or implementation change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current LongbowOspreyJobStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside LongbowOspreyJobStore\n- leave generated files and vendored code alone\n\nSeveral teams work in this billing, Elixir, Android monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nReturn an assessment of the existing artifact; only quote enough to make the walkthrough understandable.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-52134\n\n08:02 deploy LongbowDriftConsoleFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for LongbowDriftConsoleFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowDriftConsoleCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go, LongbowLedgerGateService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Playwright. Sigue queue, scheduler y cancelación, compara hipótesis y encuentra la causa antes de proponer cambios.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Playwright\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a LongbowLedgerGateService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con Playwright alrededor de LongbowLedgerGateService.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'LongbowAmberFilterFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[LongbowAmberFilterFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/longbow/services/ledger/replay.go:144: error: -[LongbowAmberFilterFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[LongbowAmberFilterFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete LongbowAmberFilterFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowDeltaCanvasCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"LongbowNimbusFormCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing LongbowMicaProfileStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: The minimum supported Core Data version in projects/longbow/lib/codec/frame.cc is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find LongbowNimbusFormStore's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: projects/longbow/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte の LongbowSlateEditorFlow で、React 19 の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- React 19 を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は LongbowSlateEditorFlow のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Rename LongbowSpruceDaemonStore's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate MeridianTideWorkerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/meridian/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex 里的 MeridianGarnetModalStore 最近在 SQLite 流程中出现间歇性问题。 原因已经明确：只把 staging timeout 从 15 秒改成 30 秒，并调整对应 assertion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 SQLite\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 MeridianGarnetModalStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: // projects/meridian/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class MeridianFlintTimelineFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure MeridianFlintTimelineFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended MeridianVelaDrawerService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current PostgreSQL 17 operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianDeltaCanvasService's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Raven: // projects/meridian/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nfinal class MeridianOrbitSyncFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure MeridianOrbitSyncFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCopperBridgeCoordinator needs a paired pass: change MeridianCopperBridgeCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql as the source of truth, preserve the WebGPU contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.24,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sable: // projects/meridian/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nfinal class MeridianCloudReconcilerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about MeridianCloudReconcilerFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new MeridianDriftConsoleFlow adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new MeridianSableParserService adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: // projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nfinal class MeridianFernSnapshotFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit MeridianFernSnapshotFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Since the last release, MeridianEchoRegistryService has shown an accessibility label that reads the internal enum; nobody on the team can reproduce it reliably on a laptop. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing NATS JetStream deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianEchoRegistryService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename MeridianAtlasSearchService's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the MeridianBeaconStoreStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring MeridianOspreyJobStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move MeridianOpalRouterStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianDeltaCanvasCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Walk through MeridianAcornWidgetService's features.py","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match MeridianPineMetricsStore's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianNovaPickerCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Incident timeline — INC-53159\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianKiteSchedulerCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged MeridianKiteSchedulerCoordinator migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianRainfallDBService crashes after reconnect","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: projects/meridian/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift has grown through several launches, and MeridianAmberFilterStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing NATS JetStream deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianAmberFilterStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-53146: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianRavenSessionFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the MeridianRavenSessionFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of MeridianMapleQueueStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: # projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go\n[worker.meridianmoonlitsdkflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.meridianmoonlitsdkflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.meridianmoonlitsdkflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.MeridianMoonlitSDKFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-53144\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Memory attributed to MeridianPrismCacheService rises after every cancelled import and never falls. Trace task ownership, buffers, and callbacks to identify what remains reachable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: MeridianMosaicGridStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, not an open-ended failure investigation. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing SQLite deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianMosaicGridStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring MeridianBasilRunnerStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: Ticket OPS-53140: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianPrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current MeridianPrismCacheFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCedarPolicyCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish MeridianCedarPolicyCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/meridian/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue as the source of truth, preserve the Tokio contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/meridian/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt into independently owned modules while MeridianFlintTimelineStore's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianMicaProfileCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin MeridianCedarPolicyStore's Tokio dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for MeridianEmberRelayStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move MeridianNimbusFormService's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged MeridianAtlasSearchStore for a read-only pass because its Tokio boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianRavenSessionCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCinderAuthStore returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/meridian/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The MeridianOpalRouterService surface in projects/meridian/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go and tell me whether MeridianCloudReconcilerStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go b/projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go\n+++ b/projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate MeridianSlateEditorFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: Bring MeridianFlintTimelineService's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: diff --git a/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nAdd the bounded MeridianPineMetricsFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: diff --git a/projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure MeridianCopperBridgeFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft MeridianAmberFilterService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around MeridianFernSnapshotCoordinator: (1) find the unknown cause of a feature flag whose default differs between environments; (2) give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the MeridianBeaconStoreService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCoralUploadService est-il sûr ?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"MeridianMosaicGridService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current SQLite operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianAmberFilterCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-53150: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianLumenChartCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise MeridianLumenChartCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for MeridianMapleQueueFlow, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The MeridianLumenChartStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect MeridianLumenChartService to outgrow its current PostgreSQL 17 arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Give me a staged design with ownership boundaries, compatibility seams, migration order, telemetry, failure drills, rollback criteria, and explicit decisions we can defer; stop before implementation.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianLumenChartService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianIrisBatchCoordinator is blocking the next release because timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change MeridianIrisBatchCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing PostgreSQL 17 conventions in projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml; do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianRavenSessionStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianSableParserCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 53133: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: SQLite\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] MeridianAsterWebhookFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] MeridianAsterWebhookFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nReconstruct the MeridianAsterWebhookFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating duplicate retries after a network handoff in MeridianEmberRelayFlow, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the MeridianOrbitSyncService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter MeridianAcornWidgetFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × MeridianAcornWidgetFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=53121 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=53121 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=53121 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=53121 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Reconstruct the MeridianAcornWidgetFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"MeridianBeaconStoreCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the MeridianLedgerGateStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: The API work is done; what remains for MeridianKiteSchedulerStore is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianKiteSchedulerStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for MeridianAtlasSearchCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change MeridianAtlasSearchCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/meridian/internal/auth/refresh.go\n- platform constraint: Tokio\n- known complication: lost focus when the drawer animation finishes\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Do not introduce another runtime dependency; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: Ticket OPS-53114: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianAtlasSearchFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged MeridianAtlasSearchFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianNimbusFormCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around MeridianPineMetricsCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for MeridianPineMetricsCoordinator; (2) also add the visible loading and offline states. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianWrenExportCoordinator: restructure, then document","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify MeridianPineMetricsService's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianMoonlitSDKCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx の MeridianGarnetModalService で、SQLite の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 consumer 向けに contract、error、retry、コピー可能な例を含む文書を書き、handler は変更しないでください。\n\n制約:\n- SQLite を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は MeridianGarnetModalService のみ","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: The minimum supported SQLite version in projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Translate the MeridianSlateEditorStore setup notes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Worker: The data is already available in projects/meridian/infra/modules/edge/main.tf; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.meridiancedarpolicyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.meridiancedarpolicyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.meridiancedarpolicyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.MeridianCedarPolicyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-53129\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. The intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Animate the MeridianFrostPanelService drawer","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 53112: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: WebGPU\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] MeridianSummitProxyFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] MeridianSummitProxyFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nReconstruct the MeridianSummitProxyFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could MeridianMicaProfileStore show the active SQLite sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited MeridianSummitProxyService and need a careful read of projects/meridian/src/sync/reconcile.ts before I can sign off on the next release. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing WebGPU deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianSummitProxyService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCinderAuthCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did MeridianFernSnapshotService's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianTideWorkerCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: # projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n[worker.meridianechoregistrycoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.meridianechoregistrycoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.meridianechoregistrycoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.MeridianEchoRegistryCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-53156\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: # projects/meridian/cmd/exporter/main.py\n[worker.meridianharborindexflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.meridianharborindexflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.meridianharborindexflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.MeridianHarborIndexFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-53131\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/meridian/cmd/exporter/main.py. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.36,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCoralUploadCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.29,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: projects/meridian/ml/pipeline/features.py の MeridianBirchMigratorFlow で、NATS JetStream の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 段階、互換性、metrics、rollback、ownership を提案し、コード変更の前で止めてください。\n\n制約:\n- NATS JetStream を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は MeridianBirchMigratorFlow のみ","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs and tell me whether MeridianPrismCacheStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCraneWorkspaceCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket: projects/meridian/config/staging.toml 里的 MeridianCraneWorkspaceService 最近在 PostgreSQL 17 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请拆分职责并去掉重复，同时保持 API、wire value、顺序和可观察行为不变。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 PostgreSQL 17\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 MeridianCraneWorkspaceService","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Check MeridianWrenExportStore's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc b/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\n+++ b/projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate MeridianMicaProfileFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-53127\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianJuniperCLIFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible MeridianJuniperCLIFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit MeridianAmberFilterFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new MeridianNimbusFormStore adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: // projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class MeridianCinderAuthFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about MeridianCinderAuthFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-53141\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise MeridianSableParserFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml, o MeridianCraneWorkspaceStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de PostgreSQL 17. A causa já é conhecida: mude apenas o timeout de staging de 15 para 30 segundos e ajuste a assertion.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com PostgreSQL 17\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao MeridianCraneWorkspaceStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"SDK consumers are ready for durable continuation tokens, so the remaining work lives in MeridianSummitProxyStore's API, storage, and worker layers. Add signed cursor parsing, bounded pagination, key rotation, tenant checks, and a resumable background path with metrics for lag, retries, and terminal failures.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianSummitProxyStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nThe contract notes are context; the requested outcome is the working server path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, MeridianBasilRunnerService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de SQLite. La causa ya está clara: cambia solo el timeout de staging de 15 a 30 segundos y ajusta su assertion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con SQLite\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a MeridianBasilRunnerService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Wire a MeridianKiteSchedulerFlow background task in projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go that expires abandoned sessions, records an OpenTelemetry span, and yields cleanly when shutdown begins.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianSpruceDaemonFlow occasionally exhibits an accessibility label that reads the internal enum, but only after a reconnect. Follow the data and cancellation paths in projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql and identify the cause before changing anything.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-53154: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianEmberRelayCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess MeridianEmberRelayCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up MeridianMosaicGridCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, which follows SQLite conventions and currently suffers from a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting. Do not introduce another runtime dependency.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin MeridianIrisBatchService's PostgreSQL dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lay out a two-milestone strategy for eliminating duplicate retries after a network handoff in MeridianEchoRegistryStore, with risk checks and a crisp definition of done for each milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in MeridianLedgerGateService?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: // projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nfinal class MeridianNimbusFormFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Consolidate MeridianNimbusFormFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of MeridianBirchMigratorService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/meridian/ml/pipeline/features.py. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current NATS JetStream operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The MeridianCinderAuthService surface in projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For MeridianSlateEditorCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for MeridianSlateEditorCoordinator; once that is complete, consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Work from projects/meridian/infra/modules/edge/main.tf, stay with Tokio, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: Incident timeline — INC-53137\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianOpalRouterFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Capture the MeridianOpalRouterFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"A flaky failure around MeridianSpruceDaemonService survived three attempted fixes, so I want the evidence and invariants traced before another patch lands. Trace task lifetime, cursor advancement, and durable acknowledgment across reconnects; produce a defensible root cause and the smallest experiment that would falsify it.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianSpruceDaemonService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For MeridianJuniperCLICoordinator, produce a consumer guide for MeridianJuniperCLICoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/meridian/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, stay with WebGPU, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Por que MeridianJuniperCLIService trava?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Repository: # projects/meridian/config/staging.toml\n[worker.meridianirisbatchflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.meridianirisbatchflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.meridianirisbatchflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.MeridianIrisBatchFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-53115\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign MeridianIrisBatchFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the MeridianMapleQueueService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianMapleQueueService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: Ticket OPS-53120: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise MeridianWrenExportFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended MeridianDriftConsoleService independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: diff --git a/projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit MeridianQuartzPlayerFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: The name pendingAck means two different things across MeridianDeltaCanvasStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianLedgerGateCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate MeridianLedgerGateCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/meridian/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift as the source of truth, preserve the NATS JetStream contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: Incident timeline — INC-53123\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianFrostPanelFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise MeridianFrostPanelFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-53139: finish the compact MeridianOspreyJobFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/meridian/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nFramework: Tokio\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete MeridianOspreyJobFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: diff --git a/projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs b/projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n+++ b/projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit MeridianVelaDrawerFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: The public surface of MeridianIrisBatchStore is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/meridian/packages/api/openapi.yaml is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianIrisBatchStore\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: For MeridianAsterWebhookCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for MeridianAsterWebhookCoordinator; once that is complete, consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Work from projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx, stay with SQLite, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded MeridianRavenSessionService export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does MeridianLumenChartFlow enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCloudReconcilerService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for MeridianFernSnapshotStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: Incident timeline — INC-53153\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianBasilRunnerCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Turn the material above into a concise MeridianBasilRunnerCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around MeridianHarborIndexCoordinator: (1) finish MeridianHarborIndexCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Do not introduce another runtime dependency, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: The MeridianBasilRunnerFlow surface in projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example. The deliverable is prose for consumers; do not alter the handler.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/meridian/services/ledger/replay.go has grown through several launches, and MeridianKiteSchedulerService now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing Tokio deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianKiteSchedulerService and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianEmberRelayService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current Tokio operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around MeridianTideWorkerStore now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: Incident timeline — INC-53113\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianMosaicGridFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Map a safe route from the current MeridianMosaicGridFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Background: The behavior of MeridianOrbitSyncStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/meridian/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- retain the current WebGPU operational envelope\n\nSeveral teams work in this geospatial, Deno, iPadOS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.\n\nThe server contract is the subject, but the requested output is documentation rather than handler code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-53152: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianSpruceDaemonCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the MeridianSpruceDaemonCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianPrismCacheCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator pod=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator-7cf8 request_id=53157 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=meridiandriftconsolecoordinator request_id=53157 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nReconstruct the MeridianDriftConsoleCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianSummitProxyCoordinator is blocking the next release because an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change MeridianSummitProxyCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing WebGPU conventions in projects/meridian/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql; do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.4,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianGarnetModalCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move MeridianDriftConsoleStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/meridian/lib/codec/frame.cc and tell me whether MeridianMicaProfileService can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Question: Ticket OPS-53126: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianLedgerGateFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged MeridianLedgerGateFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianOpalRouterCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match MeridianQuartzPlayerService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Queue MeridianHarborIndexService's expired sessions","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianAcornWidgetCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: Ticket OPS-53138: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianNovaPickerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged MeridianNovaPickerFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for MeridianMarbleTokenCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/meridian/ml/pipeline/features.py\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/meridian/ml/pipeline/features.py\n- platform constraint: NATS JetStream\n- known complication: out-of-order events after consumer rebalancing\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Do not introduce another runtime dependency; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document MeridianAcornWidgetStore's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/meridian/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianBirchMigratorStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCloudReconcilerCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Enforce MeridianSlateEditorService's idempotency key","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianOrbitSyncCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.48,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/meridian/config/staging.toml: remove the obsolete MeridianWillowCodecStore import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft MeridianRainfallDBStore's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianFrostPanelCoordinator: restructure, then document","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/meridian/engine/render/atlas.cpp b/projects/meridian/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/meridian/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n+++ b/projects/meridian/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit MeridianMapleQueueCoordinator by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What is the safest way to split projects/meridian/cmd/exporter/main.py into independently owned modules while MeridianSableParserStore's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up MeridianVelaDrawerCoordinator. First, lay out a staged migration for MeridianVelaDrawerCoordinator. In the same workstream, also add the visible loading and offline states. The relevant starting point is projects/meridian/pkg/cache/lease.rs, which follows PostgreSQL 17 conventions and currently suffers from a deadlock that appears only during shutdown. Do not introduce another runtime dependency.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Store MeridianCopperBridgeStore's delivery receipts","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the MeridianAsterWebhookService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-53142: retire the legacy replay path for MeridianDeltaCanvasFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for MeridianDeltaCanvasFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could MeridianMoonlitSDKService show the active Tokio sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianQuartzPlayerCoordinator: restructure, then assess","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give MeridianCedarPolicyService a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-53111\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianMarbleTokenFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise MeridianMarbleTokenFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is MeridianWrenExportService safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-53151\n\n08:02 deploy MeridianBirchMigratorCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for MeridianBirchMigratorCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: meridianrainfalldbflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/meridian/crates/index/src/segment.rs:217:18\n   4: meridianrainfalldbflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the MeridianRainfallDBFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did MeridianFrostPanelStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'MeridianBeaconStoreFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[MeridianBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/meridian/engine/render/atlas.cpp:144: error: -[MeridianBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[MeridianBeaconStoreFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete MeridianBeaconStoreFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/meridian/ml/pipeline/features.py, MeridianMarbleTokenStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de NATS JetStream. La causa ya está clara: cambia solo el timeout de staging de 15 a 30 segundos y ajusta su assertion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con NATS JetStream\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a MeridianMarbleTokenStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve MeridianNovaPickerService, assess whether an accessibility label that reads the internal enum is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For MeridianRainfallDBCoordinator, lay out a staged migration for MeridianRainfallDBCoordinator; once that is complete, consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Work from projects/meridian/pkg/cache/lease.rs, stay with PostgreSQL 17, and do not introduce another runtime dependency. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_53135'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_53135'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nDeliver the MeridianCraneWorkspaceFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente le contrat MeridianJuniperCLIStore","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"MeridianFlintTimelineCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/meridian/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx\nfinal class MeridianGarnetModalFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about MeridianGarnetModalFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map MeridianQuartzPlayerStore's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Warum hängt MeridianCoralUploadStore?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about MeridianVelaDrawerStore, but the current prose in projects/meridian/pkg/cache/lease.rs only describes the happy path. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n- stay compatible with the existing PostgreSQL 17 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to MeridianVelaDrawerStore and its direct tests\n\nThis repository spans geospatial, Deno, iPadOS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nThe server contract is the subject, but the requested output is documentation rather than handler code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare MeridianAsterWebhookStore's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove MeridianHarborIndexStore's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianOspreyJobCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"SDK consumers are ready for durable continuation tokens, so the remaining work lives in MeridianWillowCodecService's API, storage, and worker layers. Add signed cursor parsing, bounded pagination, key rotation, tenant checks, and a resumable background path with metrics for lag, retries, and terminal failures.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside MeridianWillowCodecService\n- do not introduce another runtime dependency\n\nThe relevant code crosses geospatial, Deno, iPadOS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/meridian/cmd/exporter/main.py hat MeridianMarbleTokenService ein sporadisches Problem im NATS JetStream-Ablauf. Trenne Verantwortlichkeiten und entferne Duplikate, ohne API, Wire-Werte, Reihenfolge oder sichtbares Verhalten zu ändern.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- NATS JetStream weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf MeridianMarbleTokenService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um MeridianMarbleTokenService mit NATS JetStream kompatibel.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"MeridianOspreyJobService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"MeridianCopperBridgeService leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/meridian/config/staging.toml\nfinal class MeridianWillowCodecCoordinatorCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about MeridianWillowCodecCoordinator; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, MeridianTideWorkerService's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: // projects/meridian/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nfinal class MeridianCoralUploadFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about MeridianCoralUploadFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare the old and new NorthstarCopperBridgeFlow adapters for ordering, error mapping, and shutdown guarantees; report semantic differences without proposing edits. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: NorthstarHarborIndexService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Change the staging timeout from 15 seconds to 30, adjust the adjacent assertion that encodes that value, and avoid unrelated formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or cleanup.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarHarborIndexService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell NorthstarBirchMigratorStore's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: Incident timeline — INC-54138\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarIrisBatchFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible NorthstarIrisBatchFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match NorthstarMicaProfileService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-54110: finish the compact NorthstarOpalRouterFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/northstar/internal/auth/refresh.go\nFramework: Spring Boot\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible NorthstarOpalRouterFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: # projects/northstar/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n[worker.northstaramberfilterflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstaramberfilterflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstaramberfilterflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarAmberFilterFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54139\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/northstar/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is NorthstarCraneWorkspaceCoordinator's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-54148: finish the compact NorthstarFernSnapshotFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nFramework: Kotlin coroutines\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring NorthstarFernSnapshotFlow's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the NorthstarMoonlitSDKStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarMoonlitSDKStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give NorthstarKiteSchedulerService a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The NorthstarFrostPanelStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around NorthstarMosaicGridService now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: Incident timeline — INC-54126\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarBasilRunnerFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible NorthstarBasilRunnerFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing NorthstarMapleQueueStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMarbleTokenService needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by Cloudflare Workers; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarCoralUploadStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMoonlitSDKCoordinator: diagnose, then document","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarQuartzPlayerCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 54132: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: Kafka\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] NorthstarKiteSchedulerFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] NorthstarKiteSchedulerFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nReconstruct the NorthstarKiteSchedulerFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: // projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nfinal class NorthstarCinderAuthFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure NorthstarCinderAuthFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring NorthstarAtlasSearchStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"In projects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml hat NorthstarNovaPickerService ein sporadisches Problem im GraphQL-Ablauf. Verfasse eine Consumer-Doku mit Vertrag, Fehlern, Retry und einem kopierbaren Beispiel; ändere keinen Handler.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- GraphQL weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf NorthstarNovaPickerService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um NorthstarNovaPickerService mit GraphQL kompatibel.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarTideWorkerFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/northstar/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Match NorthstarEchoRegistryService's dark theme","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up NorthstarOspreyJobCoordinator. First, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift. In the same workstream, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. The relevant starting point is projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, which follows Kafka conventions and currently suffers from lost focus when the drawer animation finishes. Make rollback possible without deleting user data.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: # projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n[worker.northstarnimbusformflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstarnimbusformflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstarnimbusformflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarNimbusFormFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54118\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarLumenChartCoordinator: diagnose, then document","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The NorthstarCedarPolicyFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarFlintTimelineCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve NorthstarOrbitSyncStore, assess whether a misleading timeout name used in five packages is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect NorthstarDeltaCanvasStore to outgrow its current Spring Boot arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarDeltaCanvasStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does NorthstarEchoRegistryStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54116\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarGarnetModalFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged NorthstarGarnetModalFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited NorthstarCopperBridgeService and need a careful read of projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue before I can sign off on the next release. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Spring Boot deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarCopperBridgeService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is NorthstarFrostPanelFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give NorthstarBirchMigratorService a README example","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pin NorthstarWillowCodecStore's Kotlin dependency","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: diff --git a/projects/northstar/config/staging.toml b/projects/northstar/config/staging.toml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/config/staging.toml\n+++ b/projects/northstar/config/staging.toml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate NorthstarBeaconStoreFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of NorthstarPrismCacheStore is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Kotlin coroutines operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarOrbitSyncService occasionally exhibits two validators with subtly different error strings, but only after a reconnect. Follow the data and cancellation paths in projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf and identify the cause before changing anything.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/northstar/config/staging.toml, NorthstarNovaPickerStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de GraphQL. Propón fases, compatibilidad, métricas, rollback y ownership; detente antes de tocar código.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con GraphQL\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a NorthstarNovaPickerStore Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con GraphQL alrededor de NorthstarNovaPickerStore.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Locally: The NorthstarQuartzPlayerStore surface in projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarAtlasSearchService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: The API work is done; what remains for NorthstarPineMetricsService is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarPineMetricsService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: The NorthstarSlateEditorService empty state in projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py needs a quiet illustration, a retry button, and copy that distinguishes no results from an offline response.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54114\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarSableParserFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible NorthstarSableParserFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is NorthstarVelaDrawerStore safe under cancellation?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"CI: The NorthstarAmberFilterStore surface in projects/northstar/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Investigate the NorthstarBasilRunnerService hang","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: Incident timeline — INC-54130\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarDriftConsoleFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current NorthstarDriftConsoleFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current NorthstarOpalRouterService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarOpalRouterService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does NorthstarFlintTimelineStore own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-54121: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Capture the NorthstarMicaProfileFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarNimbusFormCoordinator: correct, then assess","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.27,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: The minimum supported Cloudflare Workers version in projects/northstar/engine/render/atlas.cpp is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarAmberFilterCoordinator: make this less weird","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml b/projects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n+++ b/projects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure NorthstarMapleQueueFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarSlateEditorCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'NorthstarPineMetricsCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[NorthstarPineMetricsCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/northstar/packages/api/openapi.yaml:144: error: -[NorthstarPineMetricsCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[NorthstarPineMetricsCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring NorthstarPineMetricsCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let NorthstarAmberFilterService adopt Cloudflare Workers with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Set NorthstarLumenChartStore's port to 8081","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For NorthstarWillowCodecCoordinator, separate NorthstarWillowCodecCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts, stay with Kotlin coroutines, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cinder: Incident timeline — INC-54152\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarCedarPolicyCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise NorthstarCedarPolicyCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Delta: diff --git a/projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is NorthstarOrbitSyncFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de NorthstarEmberRelayService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMapleQueueService leaks tasks on shutdown","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across NorthstarHarborIndexStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design handed over a final pass for NorthstarTideWorkerStore, and the basic data flow in projects/northstar/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex already works. Bring the drawer and detail pane to production polish with fluid sizing, honest skeletons, focus restoration, accessible announcements, and touch targets that survive large text.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Cloudflare Workers deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarTideWorkerStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move NorthstarVelaDrawerService behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarCinderAuthCoordinator: diagnose, then correct","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarSlateEditorStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ember: What is the safest way to split projects/northstar/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte into independently owned modules while NorthstarRainfallDBStore's public behavior remains frozen for the next release?","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarSableParserCoordinator is blocking the next release because an accessibility label that reads the internal enum. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: change NorthstarSableParserCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, and capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use the existing Cloudflare Workers conventions in projects/northstar/engine/render/atlas.cpp; make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged NorthstarGarnetModalStore for a read-only pass because its GraphQL boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current GraphQL operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-54129: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarEchoRegistryFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Assess NorthstarEchoRegistryFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Corrige le timeout de NorthstarEmberRelayStore","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"// projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go\nfinal class NorthstarDeltaCanvasFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about NorthstarDeltaCanvasFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarEmberRelayCoordinator needs a paired pass: assess ownership and failure handling in projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py as the source of truth, preserve the Kafka contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect NorthstarCraneWorkspaceService to outgrow its current Kotlin coroutines arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Lay out milestones for dual operation, validation, client adoption, cutover, and removal, with a named owner and measurable exit condition for every phase.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Kotlin coroutines deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarCraneWorkspaceService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go 里的 NorthstarSummitProxyService 最近在 Spring Boot 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请实现幂等 endpoint，包含持久 cursor、tenant 鉴权、spans 和 retry 测试。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Spring Boot\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 NorthstarSummitProxyService","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarVelaDrawerCoordinator needs a paired pass: separate NorthstarVelaDrawerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, plus give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt as the source of truth, preserve the Kotlin coroutines contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Document NorthstarSableParserService's cancellation rules","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Frost: Ticket OPS-54111: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarNovaPickerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess NorthstarNovaPickerFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Garnet: projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt の NorthstarWrenExportService で、Kotlin coroutines の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 責務を分離して重複をなくし、API、wire value、順序、観測可能な動作は変えないでください。\n\n制約:\n- Kotlin coroutines を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は NorthstarWrenExportService のみ","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Persist NorthstarQuartzPlayerService delivery attempts in projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, claim them safely across workers, and make duplicate webhook receipts return the original accepted result.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt b/projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n+++ b/projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure NorthstarWrenExportFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Flip NorthstarMicaProfileStore's staging toggle","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for NorthstarPrismCacheCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: produce a consumer guide for NorthstarPrismCacheCoordinator\n- companion outcome: give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass\n- repository entry point: projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\n- platform constraint: Kotlin coroutines\n- known complication: timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Make rollback possible without deleting user data; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move NorthstarMoonlitSDKService behind one protocol","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Harbor: Ticket OPS-54159: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarTideWorkerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for NorthstarTideWorkerCoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The name pendingAck means two different things across NorthstarMarbleTokenStore's packages; rename the state and its helpers consistently while keeping wire keys untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Iris: projects/northstar/lib/codec/frame.cc now contains NorthstarAcornWidgetStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: NorthstarCedarPolicyService has one known configuration mistake in projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, not an open-ended failure investigation. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarCedarPolicyService and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Juniper: diff --git a/projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql b/projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n+++ b/projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is NorthstarWillowCodecFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_54145'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_54145'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Find the source of this NorthstarQuartzPlayerFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Kestrel: The public surface of NorthstarCloudReconcilerService is frozen, but its internal ownership in projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py is difficult to test and even harder to change safely. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarCloudReconcilerService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Animate the NorthstarCinderAuthService drawer","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMarbleTokenCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarTideWorkerService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Cloudflare Workers operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lumen: Ticket OPS-54157: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarCloudReconcilerCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current NorthstarCloudReconcilerCoordinator behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Maple: What sequence would let NorthstarCloudReconcilerStore adopt Kafka with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nimbus: # projects/northstar/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n[worker.northstarveladrawerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstarveladrawerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstarveladrawerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarVelaDrawerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54133\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/northstar/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-54154: finish the compact NorthstarHarborIndexCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/northstar/lib/codec/frame.cc\nFramework: Cloudflare Workers\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nBring NorthstarHarborIndexCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarIrisBatchStore's staging timeout is already known to be wrong: change the single projects/northstar/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql value from 15 to 30 seconds and leave production alone.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54134\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarMarbleTokenFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged NorthstarMarbleTokenFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-54119: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarRavenSessionFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise NorthstarRavenSessionFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarIrisBatchCoordinator: smooth out this interaction","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarSummitProxyCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Opal: projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift has grown through several launches, and NorthstarOspreyJobStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Introduce one ownership boundary for storage and scheduling, collapse pass-through wrappers, and characterize ordering and cancellation before moving code.\n\nConstraints:\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- stay compatible with the existing Kafka deployment\n- keep the work scoped to NorthstarOspreyJobStore and its direct tests\n\nSeveral teams work in this developer tools, Java, WebGL monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.74,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Prism: projects/northstar/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte 里的 NorthstarWrenExportStore 最近在 Kotlin coroutines 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请完成 responsive layout、空状态、retry、键盘焦点、dark mode 和 reduced motion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Kotlin coroutines\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 NorthstarWrenExportStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Clarify NorthstarSpruceDaemonStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Quartz: The NorthstarBeaconStoreService surface in projects/northstar/config/staging.toml is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py b/projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py\n+++ b/projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Deliver the NorthstarAtlasSearchFlow server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Raven: projects/northstar/config/staging.toml の NorthstarPineMetricsFlow で、GraphQL の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- GraphQL を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は NorthstarPineMetricsFlow のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Sable: The first NorthstarPineMetricsStore request after credential refresh gets 401, while an immediate retry succeeds. Follow token publication and request capture timing before recommending a fix.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For NorthstarSpruceDaemonCoordinator, assess ownership and failure handling in projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go; once that is complete, capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Work from projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go, stay with Spring Boot, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft NorthstarDeltaCanvasService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around NorthstarEchoRegistryCoordinator: (1) finish NorthstarEchoRegistryCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'NorthstarLedgerGateFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[NorthstarLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/northstar/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx:144: error: -[NorthstarLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[NorthstarLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nFinish the visible NorthstarLedgerGateFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported Kotlin coroutines version in projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate NorthstarCloudReconcilerFlow's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarAtlasSearchCoordinator: make the api less awkward","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for NorthstarCraneWorkspaceFlow events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Tide: The API work is done; what remains for NorthstarCraneWorkspaceStore is the visible interaction layer across loading, offline, empty, and success cases. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarCraneWorkspaceStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split NorthstarFlintTimelineService without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve NorthstarFernSnapshotService, assess whether an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for NorthstarOpalRouterCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: lay out a staged migration for NorthstarOpalRouterCoordinator\n- companion outcome: then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler\n- repository entry point: projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n- platform constraint: Spring Boot\n- known complication: an empty state that flashes before cached data arrives\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Make rollback possible without deleting user data; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarRainfallDBFlow returns one extra item only when the page boundary lands on a deleted record. Reconstruct the cursor transitions in projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt and find where the invariant breaks.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf now contains NorthstarJuniperCLIFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarRavenSessionService est-il sûr ?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-54153: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarRainfallDBCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Assess NorthstarRainfallDBCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for NorthstarKiteSchedulerStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Find NorthstarDriftConsoleService's duplicate retry source","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Umbra: Ticket OPS-54127: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarEmberRelayFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nCapture the NorthstarEmberRelayFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarFrostPanelCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the NorthstarPrismCacheService rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarPrismCacheService\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/northstar/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs now contains NorthstarFrostPanelService's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54136\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarMosaicGridFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the NorthstarMosaicGridFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Introduce a durable deduplication key for NorthstarCoralUploadService events and enforce it in both the database migration and the ingestion path.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Sequence NorthstarNimbusFormStore's rollout","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Move NorthstarBeaconStoreStore's clock and ID generation behind the existing environment type so tests no longer reach global state; outputs and scheduling order must stay identical.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Vela: Ticket OPS-54123: retire the legacy replay path for NorthstarLumenChartFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for NorthstarLumenChartFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'NorthstarPrismCacheFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[NorthstarPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/northstar/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte:144: error: -[NorthstarPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[NorthstarPrismCacheFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. Finish the visible NorthstarPrismCacheFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Walk through NorthstarBasilRunnerStore's segment.rs","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue b/projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n+++ b/projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure NorthstarSpruceDaemonFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarAcornWidgetCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For NorthstarMapleQueueCoordinator, produce a consumer guide for NorthstarMapleQueueCoordinator; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/northstar/config/staging.toml, stay with GraphQL, and make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarGarnetModalCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ownership of NorthstarJuniperCLIService is moving between teams while old clients remain active, so we need an executable migration sequence before touching files. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, NorthstarCedarPolicyStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around NorthstarBasilRunnerCoordinator: (1) separate NorthstarBasilRunnerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) correct the known stale timeout beside it. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarFernSnapshotCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design the NorthstarGarnetModalService rollback","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Willow: Two deliverables are holding up NorthstarDeltaCanvasCoordinator. First, produce a consumer guide for NorthstarDeltaCanvasCoordinator. In the same workstream, correct the known stale timeout beside it. The relevant starting point is projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, which follows Spring Boot conventions and currently suffers from lease renewal code copied across three workers. Make rollback possible without deleting user data.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarJuniperCLIStore has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Give NorthstarWillowCodecService a loading skeleton","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMosaicGridCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarOrbitSyncCoordinator: sort out the rough edge","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarWrenExportCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported GraphQL version in projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/northstar/pkg/cache/lease.rs and tell me whether NorthstarAsterWebhookFlow can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass. Nothing is reported broken, so keep this to an explanation of current behavior.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarBeaconStoreCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Xylem: # projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.northstarsummitproxyflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstarsummitproxyflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstarsummitproxyflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarSummitProxyFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54135\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign NorthstarSummitProxyFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell NorthstarNimbusFormService's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarLedgerGateCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Yarrow: # projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go\n[worker.northstarcopperbridgecoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstarcopperbridgecoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstarcopperbridgecoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarCopperBridgeCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54155\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zephyr: The behavior of NorthstarOpalRouterStore is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Spring Boot operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/northstar/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt, NorthstarRainfallDBService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Kotlin coroutines. Separa responsabilidades y elimina duplicación, conservando API, wire values, orden y comportamiento observable.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Kotlin coroutines\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a NorthstarRainfallDBService","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Checkout: // projects/northstar/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class NorthstarAcornWidgetFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate NorthstarAcornWidgetFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current NorthstarSableParserStore design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside NorthstarSableParserStore\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n\nThis repository spans developer tools, Java, WebGL; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nNothing is reported broken, so judge and explain current behavior without inventing a failure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.76,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove NorthstarDriftConsoleStore's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarMicaProfileCoordinator: ship, then assess","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded NorthstarHarborIndexFlow export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether NorthstarCopperBridgeStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/northstar/services/ledger/replay.go and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Exporter: // projects/northstar/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\nfinal class NorthstarOspreyJobFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit NorthstarOspreyJobFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Scheduler: Two asks around NorthstarKiteSchedulerCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/northstar/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Make rollback possible without deleting user data, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Dashboard: # projects/northstar/cmd/exporter/main.py\n[worker.northstarmoonlitsdkflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.northstarmoonlitsdkflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.northstarmoonlitsdkflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.NorthstarMoonlitSDKFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-54117\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nAlign NorthstarMoonlitSDKFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Where did NorthstarCinderAuthStore's cursor drift?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a NorthstarAsterWebhookStore changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py b/projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py\n+++ b/projects/northstar/ml/pipeline/features.py\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nConsolidate NorthstarSlateEditorFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarRavenSessionCoordinator: ship, then correct","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_54124'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_54124'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nFind the source of this NorthstarBirchMigratorFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarAsterWebhookService is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Implement the remaining visual states from the design tokens, including compact navigation, offline recovery, destructive confirmation, and animation fallbacks.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current GraphQL operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarCoralUploadCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarDriftConsoleCoordinator needs a paired pass: produce a consumer guide for NorthstarDriftConsoleCoordinator, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/northstar/infra/modules/edge/main.tf as the source of truth, preserve the Spring Boot contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarNovaPickerCoordinator is blocking the next release because a flaky snapshot caused by locale-dependent sorting. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: separate NorthstarNovaPickerCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes, and correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use the existing GraphQL conventions in projects/northstar/config/staging.toml; make rollback possible without deleting user data. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Support wants the behavior in projects/northstar/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx recast as a troubleshooting page: symptoms first, then checks, recovery, and an escalation boundary.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/northstar/src/sync/reconcile.ts, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Map NorthstarLumenChartService's ownership split","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of NorthstarOspreyJobService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/northstar/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- make rollback possible without deleting user data\n- retain the current Kafka operational envelope\n\nThe relevant code crosses developer tools, Java, WebGL. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/northstar/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue, o NorthstarSummitProxyStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de Spring Boot. Leia o fluxo atual e avalie ownership, cancelamento e ordem; preciso apenas da análise.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com Spring Boot\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao NorthstarSummitProxyStore","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54142\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarCoralUploadFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current NorthstarCoralUploadFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"$ pnpm test --filter NorthstarFlintTimelineFlow\n RUN  v3.2.4 /workspace/apps/console\n × NorthstarFlintTimelineFlow > restores a suspended upload after reconnect 1543ms\n   → expected cursor \"seg-0184\" to equal \"seg-0183\"\n\nAssertionError: expected 'seg-0184' to deeply equal 'seg-0183'\n  at packages/sync/test/reconnect.spec.ts:188:31\n  at async withFakeClock (packages/testkit/clock.ts:72:9)\n  at async Promise.all (index 1)\n\nstdout:\n  session=54120 phase=resume storedCursor=seg-0183\n  session=54120 phase=fetch requestCursor=seg-0183 pageSize=200\n  session=54120 phase=commit receivedCursor=seg-0184 itemCount=0\n  session=54120 phase=ack durable=false\n\nThe assertion passes when this file runs alone and fails about one time in twelve in the full shard. Fake time is reset in afterEach, Redis is flushed, and no production incident has been tied to it. CI uses Node 24 on Linux; local repro attempts were on macOS.\n\nReconstruct the NorthstarFlintTimelineFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in NorthstarSpruceDaemonService?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator pod=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator-7cf8 request_id=54156 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=northstarasterwebhookcoordinator request_id=54156 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nReconstruct the NorthstarAsterWebhookCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"NorthstarBirchMigratorCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish NorthstarBirchMigratorCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus correct the known stale timeout beside it. Use projects/northstar/lib/codec/frame.cc as the source of truth, preserve the Cloudflare Workers contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"quickFix","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.64,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Warum hängt NorthstarRavenSessionStore?","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-54150\n\n08:02 deploy NorthstarJuniperCLICoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for NorthstarJuniperCLICoordinator, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate OvertureWillowCodecStore's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureCopperBridgeCoordinator needs a paired pass: lay out a staged migration for OvertureCopperBridgeCoordinator, plus consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use projects/overture/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift as the source of truth, preserve the Room contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring OvertureSableParserService's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/overture/services/ledger/replay.go, OvertureIrisBatchStore tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de OpenTelemetry. Termina el layout responsive, estados vacío y retry, foco por teclado, dark mode y reduced motion.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con OpenTelemetry\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a OvertureIrisBatchStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Worker: Incident timeline — INC-55117\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureAcornWidgetFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the OvertureAcornWidgetFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"SDK consumers are ready for durable continuation tokens, so the remaining work lives in OvertureMosaicGridService's API, storage, and worker layers. Wire the schema, repository, handler, and worker so duplicate deliveries return the original result and shutdown never acknowledges uncommitted work.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureMosaicGridService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureMoonlitSDKCoordinator: the screen feels unfinished","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: OvertureOrbitSyncStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureOrbitSyncStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureAcornWidgetCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Security flagged OvertureCoralUploadStore for a read-only pass because its gRPC boundary mixes tenant data, retries, and cancellation in subtle ways. Trace ownership, ordering, error propagation, and cancellation; call out concrete risks with file references, but do not edit the implementation or turn the answer into a replacement design.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around OvertureCloudReconcilerCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/overture/lib/codec/frame.cc; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: OvertureMarbleTokenService has one known configuration mistake in projects/overture/config/staging.toml, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureMarbleTokenService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureMicaProfileCoordinator: polish the last piece","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.44,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before we approve OvertureDeltaCanvasStore, assess whether a misleading timeout name used in five packages is an actual correctness risk or merely confusing structure.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about OvertureBeaconStoreStore, but the current prose in projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureBeaconStoreStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We expect OvertureMapleQueueService to outgrow its current FastAPI arrangement next quarter, but changing everything at once would be risky. Propose the module boundaries and migration choreography, compare two viable approaches, and make the risk, cost, and reversibility tradeoffs explicit.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing FastAPI deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureMapleQueueService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Simulator: The OvertureEmberRelayFlow feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureNimbusFormCoordinator: untangle the messy bit","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55152: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureEchoRegistryCoordinator\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess OvertureEchoRegistryCoordinator for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/overture/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx 里的 OvertureOspreyJobService 最近在 gRPC 流程中出现间歇性问题。 原因已经明确：只把 staging timeout 从 15 秒改成 30 秒，并调整对应 assertion。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 gRPC\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 OvertureOspreyJobService","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"core","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"For OvertureRainfallDBCoordinator, change OvertureRainfallDBCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/overture/internal/auth/refresh.go, stay with OpenTelemetry, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.22,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Runbook: Two asks around OverturePineMetricsCoordinator: (1) lay out a staged migration for OverturePineMetricsCoordinator; (2) then implement the bounded durable-cursor handler. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"backendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/overture/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt\nfinal class OvertureBasilRunnerFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate OvertureBasilRunnerFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55132: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureTideWorkerFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current OvertureTideWorkerFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind OvertureLumenChartService's OpenTelemetry choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureQuartzPlayerCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split OvertureCedarPolicyStore without behavior changes","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two asks around OvertureHarborIndexCoordinator: (1) separate OvertureHarborIndexCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de OvertureHarborIndexStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Could OvertureVelaDrawerFlow show the active OpenTelemetry sync phase as an accessible progress row, including reduced-motion behavior?","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Center the OvertureTideWorkerStore modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Read projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp and tell me whether OvertureEmberRelayStore can acknowledge work before its durable write completes; this is a read-only safety pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Architect a gradual ownership transfer for OvertureCinderAuthStore across two teams, including module seams, temporary interfaces, observability, handoff criteria, and rollback responsibility. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Investigate the OvertureCedarPolicyService hang","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace: Incident timeline — INC-55135\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureOspreyJobFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCapture the OvertureOspreyJobFlow decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What does OvertureFernSnapshotService own?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"We need to move OvertureSpruceDaemonStore from the legacy store to Room. Propose phases, compatibility seams, metrics, rollback points, and the order in which clients should migrate; no code yet. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Diff: The OvertureBasilRunnerStore surface in projects/overture/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte is stable now; turn its edge cases into API documentation with one successful example and one cancellation example.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bump OvertureRainfallDBService's timeout to 30s","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for OvertureAmberFilterCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: separate OvertureAmberFilterCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/overture/crates/index/src/segment.rs\n- platform constraint: Swift 6\n- known complication: an accessibility label that reads the internal enum\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Check OvertureQuartzPlayerStore's trust boundary","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/overture/packages/api/openapi.yaml: remove the obsolete OvertureMarbleTokenStore import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.14,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Profiler: Two asks around OvertureOpalRouterCoordinator: (1) assess ownership and failure handling in projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py; (2) capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics, and leave a clear boundary between the resulting artifacts or edits.","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureAtlasSearchCoordinator is blocking the next release because lost focus when the drawer animation finishes. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: lay out a staged migration for OvertureAtlasSearchCoordinator, and consolidate the duplicated normalization paths without changing behavior. Use the existing gRPC conventions in projects/overture/lib/codec/frame.cc; preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"planning","secondary":"refactor","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.88,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"En projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py, OvertureDriftConsoleService tiene un problema intermitente en el flujo de Room. Añade el endpoint idempotente con cursor durable, autorización tenant, spans y tests de retry.\n\nRestricciones:\n- seguir con Room\n- conservar compatibilidad y cancelación\n- limitar el cambio a OvertureDriftConsoleService Explicita los supuestos, señala la evidencia del repositorio y mantén compatibilidad con Room alrededor de OvertureDriftConsoleService.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"core","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"In projects/overture/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue hat OvertureIrisBatchService ein sporadisches Problem im OpenTelemetry-Ablauf. Trenne Verantwortlichkeiten und entferne Duplikate, ohne API, Wire-Werte, Reihenfolge oder sichtbares Verhalten zu ändern.\n\nRandbedingungen:\n- OpenTelemetry weiterverwenden\n- Kompatibilität und Abbruchsemantik erhalten\n- Änderung auf OvertureIrisBatchService begrenzen Mache Annahmen explizit, nenne Repository-Belege und bleibe rund um OvertureIrisBatchService mit OpenTelemetry kompatibel.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"core","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'OvertureLedgerGateFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[OvertureLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/overture/crates/index/src/segment.rs:144: error: -[OvertureLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[OvertureLedgerGateFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nReconstruct the OvertureLedgerGateFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'OvertureVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[OvertureVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/overture/internal/auth/refresh.go:144: error: -[OvertureVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[OvertureVelaDrawerCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring OvertureVelaDrawerCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-55113\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureOrbitSyncFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nCon este contexto, resuelve la petición indicada manteniendo API, compatibilidad y rollback; deja claras las decisiones y la evidencia. From this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for OvertureOrbitSyncFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"es"}
{"prompt":"Any races in OvertureLedgerGateStore?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"thread 'tokio-runtime-worker' panicked at projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift:217:18:\ncalled `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. }\n\nstack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic_handler\n   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt\n   2: core::result::unwrap_failed\n   3: overturecopperbridgeflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::flush\n             at ./projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift:217:18\n   4: overturecopperbridgeflow::scheduler::LeaseTask::shutdown\n             at ./src/scheduler/lease.rs:301:14\n   5: tokio::runtime::task::core::Core::poll\n   6: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::worker::Context::run_task\n   7: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime\n\nnote: Some details are omitted, run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full for a verbose backtrace.\nruntime metrics: active_tasks=3 queued_tasks=0 open_channels=0 shutdown_reason=SIGTERM grace_ms=10000\nThe panic is only visible during rolling deploys. Requests have already drained, the sender is intentionally dropped by the coordinator, and the process exits successfully despite the panic hook writing this trace.\n\nReconstruct the OvertureCopperBridgeFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The minimum supported OpenTelemetry version in projects/overture/internal/auth/refresh.go is one patch behind the lockfile. Align that single value and regenerate only the affected metadata.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureJuniperCLICoordinator: sequence, then polish","purpose":"planning","secondary":"frontendImpl","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.8,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"On compact widths, OvertureVelaDrawerStore's filter drawer should slide over the results, trap focus, and expose a visible close control without changing the desktop layout.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"How does OvertureSableParserStore propagate cancellation through the Swift 6 boundary, and are there code paths where ownership becomes ambiguous?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For OvertureTideWorkerCoordinator, find the unknown cause of two validators with subtly different error strings; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/overture/crates/index/src/segment.rs, stay with Swift 6, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Milestones for replacing OvertureTideWorkerService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)\nSELECT e.tenant_id, e.stream_id, max(e.sequence)\nFROM event_log e\nJOIN active_streams s\n  ON s.tenant_id = e.tenant_id AND s.id = e.stream_id\nWHERE e.tenant_id = 't_55158'\n  AND e.created_at >= now() - interval '24 hours'\nGROUP BY e.tenant_id, e.stream_id;\n\nHashAggregate  (cost=184922.10..185011.81 rows=8971 width=40) (actual time=8421.294..8422.551 rows=123 loops=1)\n  Group Key: e.tenant_id, e.stream_id\n  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 945kB\n  -> Hash Join  (cost=2118.42..181004.17 rows=522391 width=32) (actual time=42.118..8279.405 rows=918412 loops=1)\n     Hash Cond: ((e.tenant_id = s.tenant_id) AND (e.stream_id = s.id))\n     -> Bitmap Heap Scan on event_log e  (actual time=18.602..7922.884 rows=1261044 loops=1)\n        Recheck Cond: (tenant_id = 't_55158'::text)\n        Filter: (created_at >= (now() - '24:00:00'::interval))\n        Rows Removed by Filter: 8045512\nPlanning Time: 2.814 ms\nExecution Time: 8423.104 ms\n\nPostgreSQL 17.2, default_statistics_target=100. The same query was under 300 ms last week, no migration landed, and an ANALYZE temporarily returns it to normal.\n\nReconstruct the OvertureSummitProxyCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.95,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureOspreyJobCoordinator: clean up that old path","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts b/projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n+++ b/projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure OverturePineMetricsFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=overtureslateeditorflow pod=overtureslateeditorflow-7cf8 request_id=55120 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=overtureslateeditorflow request_id=55120 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nFind the source of this OvertureSlateEditorFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Our support and SDK teams keep answering the same questions about OvertureAtlasSearchService, but the current prose in projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp only describes the happy path. Draft an ADR plus migration note that records the decision, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, observability signals, and the exact action required from consumers.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing gRPC deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureAtlasSearchService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureMicaProfileService needs an idempotent replay endpoint backed by FastAPI; accept a cursor, cap each page at 500 items, and return a stable continuation token.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Console: Could the reasoning behind OvertureEchoRegistryStore's Swift 6 choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Unify the OvertureQuartzPlayerService validators","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the OvertureFernSnapshotStore diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Workspace: Ticket OPS-55131: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureCraneWorkspaceFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess OvertureCraneWorkspaceFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Three teams extended OvertureMosaicGridStore independently, leaving parallel adapters and normalization branches that are supposed to behave identically. Separate those responsibilities into focused units, remove the duplicated normalization branches, and keep public types, wire values, log fields, timing, and test-observable behavior exactly the same.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current FastAPI operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.\n\nThe target structure is settled; carry out the behavior-preserving edits rather than writing another strategy.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Em projects/overture/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex, o OvertureOspreyJobStore tem um problema intermitente no fluxo de gRPC. Separe responsabilidades e remova duplicação sem mudar API, wire values, ordem ou comportamento observável.\n\nRestrições:\n- continuar com gRPC\n- preservar compatibilidade e cancelamento\n- limitar a mudança ao OvertureOspreyJobStore","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Cadre la migration de OvertureFrostPanelService","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"core","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"Production says OvertureKiteSchedulerService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current gRPC operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Nobody is asking for code changes yet; we first need to understand whether the current OvertureEmberRelayService design actually guarantees what its callers assume. Follow one successful request and each early exit through the code, then rank findings by impact and state which apparent hazards are already ruled out by invariants.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureEmberRelayService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.66,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureSlateEditorCoordinator: assess, then document","purpose":"review","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft OvertureBeaconStoreService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-55145: finish the compact OvertureCinderAuthFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/overture/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nFramework: gRPC\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\n请根据以上上下文完成对应工作，保持 API、兼容性和 rollback，并明确说明证据和取舍。 Finish the visible OvertureCinderAuthFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Repository: diff --git a/projects/overture/pkg/cache/lease.rs b/projects/overture/pkg/cache/lease.rs\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/overture/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n+++ b/projects/overture/pkg/cache/lease.rs\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRead the artifact above as a skeptical reviewer. Is OvertureAmberFilterFlow's current ordering, ownership, and cancellation behavior safe? Return findings with evidence, without editing files.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureWrenExportCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-55151: finish the compact OvertureWillowCodecCoordinator filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/overture/web/components/FilterDrawer.vue\nFramework: OpenTelemetry\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible OvertureWillowCodecCoordinator state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Could the reasoning behind OvertureMoonlitSDKService's gRPC choices be captured as an ADR for engineers joining the project next quarter?","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The behavior of OvertureSummitProxyService is stable, yet consumers are reconstructing its contract from tests, Slack threads, and scattered comments in projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift. Produce a reader-first guide that states the contract, calls out retries and cancellation, gives one copyable example, and separates operator advice from application-developer advice.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current Room operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-55146\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureLumenChartFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nReconstruct the OvertureLumenChartFlow failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether OvertureBirchMigratorService's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/overture/config/staging.toml and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Pipeline: Incident timeline — INC-55111\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureIrisBatchFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFind the source of this OvertureIrisBatchFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.9,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/overture/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift has grown through several launches, and OvertureSummitProxyStore now mixes policy, transport, persistence, and metrics in one place. Rename the overloaded state, extract the pure conversion work, and make dependencies explicit while preserving ABI, serialization, metrics, and failure messages.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureSummitProxyStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.\n\nThe target structure is settled; carry out the behavior-preserving edits rather than writing another strategy.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Gateway: Incident timeline — INC-55115\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureCoralUploadFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged OvertureCoralUploadFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.86,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"// projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp\nfinal class OvertureAtlasSearchFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWire OvertureAtlasSearchFlow's schema, storage, handler, and worker path so continuation is signed, duplicate delivery is stable, and shutdown cannot acknowledge uncommitted work.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.81,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55116: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureWrenExportFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nAssess OvertureWrenExportFlow for durability, tenant isolation, races, and misleading observability. Separate blockers from questions and do not produce a patch.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Release engineering needs a OvertureSpruceDaemonService changelog entry that distinguishes operator action from invisible internal cleanup and names the rollback condition.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureFlintTimelineCoordinator: why is this odd","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for OvertureAcornWidgetService","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Renderer: projects/overture/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift now contains OvertureDeltaCanvasService's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureDriftConsoleStore's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureRavenSessionService has four wrappers that only translate the same error enum. Collapse them into one adapter and preserve every public case, message, and metric label.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureBasilRunnerCoordinator: check the suspicious part","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Indexer: The OvertureMicaProfileStore feature flag default should be false in test, exactly like production; correct that config entry and nothing else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: OvertureVelaDrawerService works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureVelaDrawerService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureGarnetModalCoordinator: take care of the warning","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.72,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename OvertureSlateEditorService's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureBirchMigratorCoordinator: rethink this area","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Apparently: // projects/overture/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\nfinal class OvertureGarnetModalFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nRestructure OvertureGarnetModalFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please turn OvertureKiteSchedulerStore's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureNimbusFormService's metric is misspelled as succesful_total in one declaration. Correct that literal and its exact test expectation, without renaming anything else.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.12,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"SDK consumers are ready for durable continuation tokens, so the remaining work lives in OvertureAmberFilterService's API, storage, and worker layers. Wire the schema, repository, handler, and worker so duplicate deliveries return the original result and shutdown never acknowledges uncommitted work.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureAmberFilterService\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Teach OvertureMarbleTokenFlow to verify signed continuation tokens, reject cross-tenant cursors, and rotate keys without invalidating tokens issued during the overlap window.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"The data is already available in projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts; render it as a sortable table with a compact mobile card fallback, visible focus, and honest loading placeholders.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Lately: // projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py\nfinal class OvertureJuniperCLIFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nWalk through what the artifact proves about OvertureJuniperCLIFlow; flag semantic changes and missing coverage with exact evidence, keeping this a read-only pass.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Spell OvertureOpalRouterService's metric correctly","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.17,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureAmberFilterStore is functionally complete on desktop, but compact widths and assistive technologies still expose unfinished states. Finish the responsive layout, empty and retry states, keyboard order, VoiceOver labels, dark appearance, and reduced-motion transition while preserving the existing data-loading code.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureCinderAuthCoordinator: deal with the small issue","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-55153\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureDriftConsoleCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\n上のコンテキストを基に依頼された作業を行い、API、互換性、rollback を維持し、根拠と判断を明確にしてください。 Capture the OvertureDriftConsoleCoordinator decision as an ADR with context, chosen behavior, rejected alternatives, compatibility window, and measurable rollback trigger.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.65,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Oddly: # projects/overture/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte\n[worker.overturemosaicgridcoordinator]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.overturemosaicgridcoordinator.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.overturemosaicgridcoordinator.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.OvertureMosaicGridCoordinator.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-55159\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nMake the one confirmed configuration correction in projects/overture/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte. Keep retry counts, shutdown grace, dependencies, formatting, and production values exactly as they are.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureCraneWorkspaceCoordinator needs a paired pass: finish OvertureCraneWorkspaceCoordinator's responsive empty and retry states, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/overture/services/ledger/replay.go as the source of truth, preserve the OpenTelemetry contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.56,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureNovaPickerCoordinator: something is off here","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Add a bounded OvertureMapleQueueStore export stream that resumes from checkpoints, respects cancellation, and exposes queue lag plus terminal failure counters.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55140: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureMoonlitSDKFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for OvertureMoonlitSDKFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.57,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Currently: Please turn OvertureMosaicGridFlow's existing tests into a short contract reference, covering pagination, malformed input, authorization, and retry semantics without copying test code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Today: projects/overture/ml/pipeline/features.py 里的 OvertureFlintTimelineStore 最近在 Room 流程中出现间歇性问题。 请给出阶段、兼容层、指标、rollback 和 ownership，先不要修改代码。\n\n约束：\n- 继续使用 Room\n- 保持兼容性和取消语义\n- 改动只限于 OvertureFlintTimelineStore","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"zh"}
{"prompt":"Collapse the OvertureCraneWorkspaceService wrappers","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Design the OvertureJuniperCLIService rollback","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the OverturePineMetricsService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureSableParserCoordinator: handle the lingering thing","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.7,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: OvertureAcornWidgetStore has one known configuration mistake in projects/overture/config/staging.toml, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing Swift 6 deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureAcornWidgetStore and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.3,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Trace OvertureOpalRouterStore's memory growth","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.71,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Context: Incident timeline — INC-55143\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureFlintTimelineFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the artifact into a reversible OvertureFlintTimelineFlow rollout strategy: phases, dual-operation window, validation, ownership, removal criteria, and explicit stop conditions.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Background: Incident timeline — INC-55121\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureFernSnapshotFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nBearbeite auf Basis dieses Kontexts die beschriebene Aufgabe; API, Kompatibilität und Rollback müssen erhalten bleiben. Turn the material above into a concise OvertureFernSnapshotFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"de"}
{"prompt":"Question: Incident timeline — INC-55157\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureMarbleTokenCoordinator 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nTurn the material above into a concise OvertureMarbleTokenCoordinator release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.62,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Assess the OvertureCoralUploadService diff","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'OvertureNovaPickerFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[OvertureNovaPickerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/overture/db/migrations/20260730_events.sql:144: error: -[OvertureNovaPickerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[OvertureNovaPickerFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nUse the UI evidence to complete OvertureNovaPickerFlow's compact and accessibility behavior, including focus restoration, large text, offline recovery, and honest loading feedback.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does OvertureLumenChartStore enforce tenant scope before decoding its cursor, and could any early-return path reveal whether a foreign record exists?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Summarize the OvertureCopperBridgeService changes","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Does OvertureCopperBridgeStore preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Any races in OvertureCloudReconcilerStore?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.5,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Test Suite 'OvertureEmberRelayCoordinatorTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[OvertureEmberRelayCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp:144: error: -[OvertureEmberRelayCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[OvertureEmberRelayCoordinatorTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nBring OvertureEmberRelayCoordinator's sheet to release quality across phone and tablet layouts; preserve its data flow while correcting selection, keyboard, VoiceOver, and animation states.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft OvertureCloudReconcilerService's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"What sequence would let OvertureBirchMigratorStore adopt Swift 6 with dual reads but no dual writes? Include data validation, canary scope, and the decision that ends compatibility mode. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureFrostPanelCoordinator: diagnose, then document","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.83,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Clarify OverturePineMetricsStore's retry docs","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.43,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureFernSnapshotCoordinator: document, then assess","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.45,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Before touching projects/overture/crates/index/src/segment.rs, propose how to retire its legacy format while old clients remain active for ninety days and operators retain a reversible escape hatch. Stop at the restructuring strategy rather than editing files.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Compare OvertureCraneWorkspaceStore's two adapters","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Polish the OvertureWrenExportService toolbar","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"projects/overture/infra/modules/edge/main.tf now contains OverturePrismCacheStore's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# projects/overture/ml/pipeline/features.py\n[worker.overtureopalrouterflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.overtureopalrouterflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.overtureopalrouterflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.OvertureOpalRouterFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-55133\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/overture/ml/pipeline/features.py and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Observation: # projects/overture/packages/api/openapi.yaml\n[worker.overturesableparserflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.overturesableparserflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.overturesableparserflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.OvertureSableParserFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-55137\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nCom este contexto, trate a solicitação indicada preservando API, compatibilidade e rollback, com decisões e evidências claras. Align OvertureSableParserFlow's staging timeout with the shown production value and refresh only the focused config test; nothing else in the paste should move.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Constraint: // projects/overture/config/staging.toml\nfinal class OvertureBirchMigratorFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nSplit OvertureBirchMigratorFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.82,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 55114: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: FastAPI\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] OvertureBeaconStoreFlowIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] OvertureBeaconStoreFlowIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nAdd the bounded OvertureBeaconStoreFlow replay flow described here, including authorization, key rotation, cancellation, lag metrics, and tests for malformed and cross-tenant cursors.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"One contained cleanup in projects/overture/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex: remove the obsolete OvertureKiteSchedulerFlow import and let the existing formatter settle the blank line.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.09,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring OvertureNimbusFormStore's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Request: projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts now contains OvertureMapleQueueFlow's normalization branch three times. Consolidate it behind one private helper, keep call ordering identical, and avoid touching generated code. Please preserve behavior.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureOrbitSyncCoordinator is blocking the next release because lease renewal code copied across three workers. I need two concrete outcomes from a single pass: produce a consumer guide for OvertureOrbitSyncCoordinator, and give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Use the existing Room conventions in projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py; preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the outcomes distinct so reviewers can see which evidence supports the assessment and which files or prose satisfy the requested change.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve public wire values and tenant boundaries\n- cover cancellation and retry behavior\n- avoid generated code and unrelated cleanup\n- include a rollback trigger that an on-call engineer can measure\n\nThis is a fresh workstream for the release, so derive everything from the repository and the context here.","purpose":"writing","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Goal: // projects/overture/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\nfinal class OvertureCedarPolicyFlowCoordinator {\n    private let store: EventStore\n    private let clock: Clock\n    private var pending: [Event.ID: Task<Void, Never>] = [:]\n\n    func accept(_ event: Event) {\n        pending[event.id]?.cancel()\n        pending[event.id] = Task {\n            let normalized = normalize(event)\n            try? await store.persist(normalized)\n            await MainActor.run {\n                NotificationCenter.default.post(\n                    name: .eventDidPersist,\n                    object: event.id\n                )\n            }\n        }\n    }\n\n    func stop() {\n        pending.values.forEach { $0.cancel() }\n        pending.removeAll()\n    }\n}\n\n// A second copy lives in PreviewCoordinator.swift. It uses the same normalization\n// rules but calls store.persist before assigning the Task into `pending`.\n\nTests currently cover successful persistence and explicit stop. They do not cover replacement of an in-flight event with the same ID, cancellation thrown by the store, or whether the notification may arrive after stop returns. Public callers rely on accept being synchronous.\n\nConsolidate OvertureCedarPolicyFlow's parallel adapters behind a single internal boundary, with no changes to API, timing, serialization, metrics, or error text.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.77,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OverturePrismCacheCoordinator: give it a nicer flow","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.46,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureRavenSessionCoordinator: maybe tighten this up","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.68,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-55119\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureFrostPanelFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nFrom this evidence, draft consumer-facing migration guidance for OvertureFrostPanelFlow, plus a short operational recovery note. Keep uncertainty explicit and leave the implementation untouched.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.67,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Bring OvertureBasilRunnerService's confirmation sheet in line with the design tokens, including destructive emphasis, dark appearance, Dynamic Type, and swipe-to-dismiss behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two deliverables are holding up OvertureIrisBatchCoordinator. First, find the unknown cause of timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/overture/services/ledger/replay.go, which follows OpenTelemetry conventions and currently suffers from timestamps rendered one day ahead near UTC midnight. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.92,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Symptom: # projects/overture/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift\n[worker.overturequartzplayerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.overturequartzplayerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.overturequartzplayerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.OvertureQuartzPlayerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-55118\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/overture/Sources/App/SessionStore.swift and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Please resist widening this one: OvertureWrenExportStore works, but staging still carries a setting that production corrected last month. Align the one stale configuration entry with production, refresh only its focused snapshot, and leave retries, grace periods, dependencies, and neighboring comments untouched.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureWrenExportStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.28,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"# CI job 55154: integration-linux\nrunner: ubuntu-24.04 / amd64 / 8 cores\ntoolchain: FastAPI\n\n[setup] restoring cache key deps-a2f91c ... hit\n[setup] starting postgres:17 ... healthy after 4.2s\n[setup] starting redis:8 ... healthy after 0.8s\n[test] shard 3/8 selected 412 tests\n[test] OvertureMapleQueueCoordinatorIntegration.replays_after_timeout ... ok\n[test] OvertureMapleQueueCoordinatorIntegration.cancels_orphaned_batch ... FAILED\n\nExpected:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 0\nActual:\n  pending_jobs{queue=\"replay\"} 1\n\nCaptured spans:\n  batch.receive       2.1ms status=ok\n  storage.transaction 44.8ms status=cancelled\n  batch.nack          <missing>\n\nteardown warning: resource still in use: redis connection pool (1 borrower)\nretry 1/2 with identical seed ... passed\nretry 2/2 with identical seed ... passed\n\nThe failure began after the test suite was sharded, but it sometimes appears on an unsharded nightly run. There are no wall-clock sleeps in this test; it advances the fake scheduler until idle.\n\nDeliver the OvertureMapleQueueCoordinator server-side capability implied above: durable cursors, tenant authorization, idempotent retries, bounded work, telemetry, and focused integration coverage.","purpose":"backendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureLedgerGateCoordinator: diagnose, then document","purpose":"debugging","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.78,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"This should remain a deliberately small patch: OvertureOrbitSyncService has one known configuration mistake in projects/overture/ml/pipeline/features.py, not an open-ended failure investigation. Correct the known literal and the test that intentionally mirrors it; the final diff should stay local enough for an on-call engineer to verify at a glance.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing Room deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureOrbitSyncService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"PM is preparing the OvertureAtlasSearchStore rollout and needs prose that works for both application developers and the operators who will carry the pager. Turn the repository behavior into a compact reference with prerequisites, request and response examples, failure semantics, a rollback note, and links to the authoritative config keys.\n\nConstraints:\n- cover cancellation, retries, and rollback in the result\n- avoid unrelated changes outside OvertureAtlasSearchStore\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n\nSeveral teams work in this IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS monorepo, so keep ownership and handoff points understandable in a small review.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.49,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/overture/infra/modules/edge/main.tf b/projects/overture/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/overture/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n+++ b/projects/overture/infra/modules/edge/main.tf\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nSplit OvertureRainfallDBFlow by responsibility and make cancellation ownership explicit. Characterize the current sequence before moving code and keep callers unchanged.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.79,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Headsup: projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py の OvertureFlintTimelineService で、Room の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 現在の flow を読み、ownership、cancel、順序が安全か評価してください。分析だけで十分です。\n\n制約:\n- Room を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は OvertureFlintTimelineService のみ","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.58,"slice":"core","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"Production says OvertureEchoRegistryService is healthy while users see stalled work, and the current telemetry does not reveal which ownership boundary lost progress. Correlate the queue, scheduler, storage, and shutdown paths; form competing hypotheses, identify evidence for each, and narrow the root cause before proposing a code change.\n\nConstraints:\n- touch generated artifacts only through their checked-in generator\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- retain the current Swift 6 operational envelope\n\nThis repository spans IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS; use its existing conventions rather than importing a new abstraction.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Why does OvertureGarnetModalService's FastAPI worker stop making progress while its health endpoint remains green? Gather evidence from the scheduler and queue code and narrow the failure mode.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"UI ticket DES-55127: finish the compact OvertureHarborIndexFlow filter experience\n\nRoute: /catalog/search\nSource: projects/overture/config/staging.toml\nFramework: Swift 6\n\nCurrent QA notes\n- at 390 px the filter sheet is wider than the viewport by 16 px\n- returning from background selects segment four while the visible chip says three\n- keyboard focus falls behind the sheet after Apply\n- VoiceOver announces the internal value `sync_state_retriable`\n- the loading spinner never resolves into an offline action\n- dark appearance uses the light divider token\n- Reduce Motion still runs the spring transition\n- at accessibility XXXL the footer buttons overlap\n\nBrowser console during the transition:\n[ui] sheet.presented source=toolbar selected=3\n[ui] scene.inactive cachedSelection=3\n[ui] scene.active restoredSelection=4\n[ui] focus.restore target=filter-button result=detached\n[ui] network.status value=offline renderedState=loading\n\nAcceptance criteria from design\nThe phone layout should use an edge-to-edge sheet; tablet keeps the anchored panel. Applying filters returns focus to the opener and announces the result count. Empty, offline, retrying, and loaded states must be visually distinct. Use existing design tokens, support keyboard escape, preserve current data requests, and provide a no-animation path when Reduce Motion is enabled.\n\nFinish the visible OvertureHarborIndexFlow state described above: responsive layout, correct selection restoration, keyboard focus, accessible labels, dark mode, and reduced-motion behavior.","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55136: retire the legacy replay path for OverturePrismCacheFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nTurn the material above into a concise OverturePrismCacheFlow release note and operator runbook section. State impact, detection, rollback, and the client-visible contract; do not modify code.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.59,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureCedarPolicyCoordinator needs a paired pass: change OvertureCedarPolicyCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds, plus capture the contract and rollback note for consumers. Use projects/overture/ui/settings/PrivacyPane.tsx as the source of truth, preserve the gRPC contract, and avoid unrelated cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"FYI: Does OvertureLedgerGateService preserve ordering?","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Responsive layout for OvertureJuniperCLIStore","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.52,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureSpruceDaemonCoordinator: ship a sensible version","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.41,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Meanwhile: # projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp\n[worker.overturecloudreconcilerflow]\nenabled = true\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nshutdown_grace_seconds = 10\nmax_in_flight = 32\nretry_attempts = 4\nretry_base_milliseconds = 250\n\n[worker.overturecloudreconcilerflow.staging]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 15\nemit_debug_spans = true\n\n[worker.overturecloudreconcilerflow.production]\nrequest_timeout_seconds = 30\nemit_debug_spans = false\n\nFailing assertion:\n  ConfigTests.OvertureCloudReconcilerFlow.staging_timeout_matches_supported_gateway\n  expected: Duration.seconds(30)\n  actual:   Duration.seconds(15)\n\nTicket note CFG-55130\nThe upstream gateway minimum was raised to thirty seconds last month. Production was corrected in the same change, but the staging override and its focused assertion were missed. The service owner has confirmed this is a configuration-only correction: no retry counts, grace periods, pool sizes, production values, or dependency versions should move. A staging deploy is sufficient validation, and rollback is the previous config map.\n\nThe intended correction is already known: change only the stale 15-second setting to 30 seconds in projects/overture/engine/render/atlas.cpp and its adjacent assertion. Avoid broader cleanup.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"2026-07-30T08:14:11.409Z level=info service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator pod=overturekiteschedulercoordinator-7cf8 request_id=55155 msg=\"lease acquired\" partition=12 epoch=884\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.417Z level=debug service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"batch loaded\" rows=250 cursor=01JZ7M\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.590Z level=warn service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"heartbeat delayed\" elapsed_ms=3012 deadline_ms=3000\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.593Z level=info service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"lease renewed\" partition=12 epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.598Z level=error service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"commit rejected\" expected_epoch=884 actual_epoch=885\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.601Z level=info service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"retry scheduled\" attempt=1 delay_ms=0\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.617Z level=warn service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"duplicate key ignored\" event_id=ev_29af\n2026-07-30T08:14:11.620Z level=info service=overturekiteschedulercoordinator request_id=55155 msg=\"batch acknowledged\" rows=250\n\nDeployment is Kubernetes 1.34 with four replicas. The warning begins after a consumer rebalance and stops after the pod is restarted. Queue depth remains flat, CPU is 28%, and the readiness probe never fails.\n\nReconstruct the OvertureKiteSchedulerCoordinator failure timeline, test competing hypotheses against the pasted evidence, and identify the first broken invariant rather than treating later warnings as causes.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.87,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Locally: Test Suite 'OvertureAsterWebhookFlowTests' started at 2026-07-30 09:22:14.018\nTest Case '-[OvertureAsterWebhookFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' started.\nprojects/overture/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt:144: error: -[OvertureAsterWebhookFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding] : XCTAssertEqual failed: (\"Optional(4)\") is not equal to (\"Optional(3)\")\nAccessibility hierarchy at failure:\n  Application, 0x104c, pid: 812\n    Window, identifier: \"main\"\n      NavigationStack, identifier: \"catalog\"\n        Button, label: \"Filters\", value: \"2 active\"\n        CollectionView, identifier: \"results-grid\", rows: 24\n        Sheet, identifier: \"filter-sheet\"\n          TextField, label: \"Search filters\", value: \"\"\n          Switch, label: \"Available offline\", value: \"1\"\n          Button, label: \"Apply\", enabled: true\nTest Case '-[OvertureAsterWebhookFlowTests testRestoresSelectionAfterBackgrounding]' failed (4.812 seconds).\n\nSimulator: iPhone 17 Pro, iOS 27.0, en_US, content size XXXL, Reduce Motion enabled. The screenshot looks correct. The mismatch is the internal selected-segment index after the scene becomes active; tapping Apply a second time makes it three again.\n\nÀ partir de ce contexte, traite la demande indiquée en préservant API, compatibilité et rollback, avec des décisions explicites. Find the source of this OvertureAsterWebhookFlow symptom by following task lifetime, cursor movement, durable writes, and cleanup. Propose code only after the evidence supports one cause.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"fr"}
{"prompt":"A previously stable test around OvertureNovaPickerService now fails one run in twenty. Determine whether ordering, locale, or leaked state is responsible.","purpose":"debugging","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"diff --git a/projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift b/projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\nindex 62d71aa..90f3c1e 100644\n--- a/projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n+++ b/projects/overture/Sources/CLI/Commands/Doctor.swift\n@@ -41,18 +41,27 @@ export async function reconcile(input: Batch) {\n-  const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n-  await store.write(rows);\n-  await metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length);\n+  const scope = tracer.startActiveSpan(\"reconcile\");\n+  try {\n+    const rows = input.items.map(normalize);\n+    await Promise.all([\n+      store.write(rows),\n+      metrics.count(\"reconciled\", rows.length),\n+    ]);\n+    return { cursor: input.next, count: rows.length };\n+  } finally {\n+    scope.end();\n+  }\n }\n\n@@ -88,7 +97,11 @@ function normalize(item: WireItem): Row {\n-  return { id: item.id, value: item.payload ?? \"\" };\n+  return {\n+    id: item.id.trim(),\n+    value: item.payload?.normalize(\"NFC\") ?? \"\",\n+    receivedAt: clock.now(),\n+  };\n }\n\nPR note: staging p95 drops by 18 ms. Tests assert row counts but not whether metrics happen before the durable write.\n\nRestructure OvertureSpruceDaemonFlow so duplicated normalization and shutdown ownership have one home. Preserve public behavior, wire values, logging fields, and ordering; extend characterization coverage first.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.84,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Two engineers disagree about whether OvertureGarnetModalStore's cache is authoritative. Walk the reads and writes in projects/overture/app/src/main/SyncWorker.kt and settle that question from the code.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Split projects/overture/cmd/exporter/main.py by responsibility, not file length: isolate parsing, validation, and persistence while leaving the exported surface and call sequence untouched.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Extract OvertureAsterWebhookService's parsing loop","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.63,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Rename OvertureRainfallDBStore's staleLease state","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"I inherited OvertureWillowCodecService and need a careful read of projects/overture/services/ledger/replay.go before I can sign off on the next release. Assess authorization, concurrency, durability, and shutdown behavior against existing tests, highlighting any undocumented assumption that a caller could violate.\n\nConstraints:\n- preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics\n- stay compatible with the existing OpenTelemetry deployment\n- keep the work scoped to OvertureWillowCodecService and its direct tests\n\nThe relevant code crosses IoT fleet, Ruby, SolidJS. Prefer evidence from the repository and make any assumption explicit.","purpose":"review","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.69,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Ticket OPS-55138: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureDeltaCanvasFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current OvertureDeltaCanvasFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.94,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Production: Ticket OPS-55142: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureRavenSessionFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nUsing this as the starting evidence, propose a staged OvertureRavenSessionFlow migration with compatibility seams, owners, canary metrics, rollback gates, and a no-code first milestone.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.91,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Staging: Two deliverables are holding up OvertureBeaconStoreCoordinator. First, separate OvertureBeaconStoreCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes. In the same workstream, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. The relevant starting point is projects/overture/src/sync/reconcile.ts, which follows FastAPI conventions and currently suffers from duplicate retries after a network handoff. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics.\n\nPlease make the boundary between analysis and changes obvious, preserve tenant and wire compatibility, exercise cancellation plus retries, and leave unrelated generators alone. The handoff should include one measurable rollback signal and enough repository evidence for separate reviewers to verify each outcome.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureLumenChartCoordinator: the docs need something","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Remove OvertureAsterWebhookStore's stray comma","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.19,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"For OvertureAsterWebhookCoordinator, separate OvertureAsterWebhookCoordinator's policy from transport without behavior changes; once that is complete, give the existing implementation a read-only safety pass. Work from projects/overture/apps/console/routes/usage.svelte, stay with FastAPI, and preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics. Keep the two outcomes separately reviewable.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":"review","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.73,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Is there a cleaner way to separate OvertureCinderAuthService's transport, persistence, and retry policy without changing its API or timing behavior? Go ahead and make that structural change.","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.53,"slice":"core","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"OvertureDeltaCanvasCoordinator: could this be clearer","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.6,"slice":"vague-eval","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Atlas: projects/overture/services/ledger/replay.go の OvertureWillowCodecFlow で、OpenTelemetry の flow に断続的な問題が起きています。 責務を分離して重複をなくし、API、wire value、順序、観測可能な動作は変えないでください。\n\n制約:\n- OpenTelemetry を継続利用\n- 互換性と cancel の意味を維持\n- 変更範囲は OvertureWillowCodecFlow のみ","purpose":"refactor","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.55,"slice":"boundary","lang":"ja"}
{"prompt":"PM needs a concise migration note for OvertureRavenSessionStore, including the user impact, rollback trigger, and the one configuration key operators must change.","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Beacon: Ticket OPS-55144: retire the legacy replay path for OvertureMicaProfileFlow\n\nBackground\nThe mobile clients now send monotonic cursors, but the worker still supports the pre-2024 offset token. That compatibility branch performs an extra database lookup on every page and owns a separate retry counter. Support confirmed that the oldest active client is version 8.14, which uses cursors.\n\nAcceptance notes\n- existing cursor tokens must remain valid during a two-release overlap\n- operators need one metric showing legacy traffic by client version\n- a rollback must not require restoring deleted columns\n- tenant isolation remains enforced in the storage query\n- SDK examples should show how to persist the continuation token\n- the public route and current 429 envelope cannot change\n\nOpen questions\nDo we delete the offset decoder immediately or quarantine it behind a flag? Who owns the mobile version gate? Can the database index be removed in the same deploy? Security wants evidence that forged cursors cannot select another tenant.\n\nSlack excerpt\nMina 09:42: “I can provide client adoption numbers, but not a guarantee about sideloaded builds.”\nRavi 09:47: “Please make the rollback trigger explicit; queue lag alone is too noisy.”\n\nMap a safe route from the current OvertureMicaProfileFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.96,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Incident timeline — INC-55141\n\n08:02 deploy OvertureNimbusFormFlow 6.18.0 begins in eu-west\n08:06 write latency rises from 22 ms to 410 ms; error rate remains below 0.2%\n08:08 autoscaler adds three workers; queue lag continues rising\n08:11 on-call disables feature flag `parallel_commit_v2`\n08:13 latency returns to 31 ms, but duplicate-event warnings increase\n08:19 traffic moved to the previous worker pool\n08:27 queue lag clears; no customer data loss observed\n\nWhat changed\nThe release moved metrics emission into the same Promise.all as the durable write and added NFC normalization to event payloads. Database CPU peaked at 64%, Redis stayed normal, and the downstream consumer reported 183 duplicate keys that its uniqueness constraint ignored.\n\nConstraints from incident command\n- no emergency schema change\n- preserve tenant ordering\n- canary must include a forced consumer rebalance\n- rollback decision must use two independent signals\n- ownership between storage and ingestion teams must be explicit\n\nThe next regular release window is in six days.\n\nMap a safe route from the current OvertureNimbusFormFlow behavior to the desired one, comparing two approaches and naming telemetry, failure drills, and rollback responsibility.","purpose":"planning","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.89,"slice":"pasted-context","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Documente o contrato de OvertureHarborIndexService","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.38,"slice":"core","lang":"pt"}
{"prompt":"Fresh release brief for OvertureCoralUploadCoordinator:\n- primary outcome: change OvertureCoralUploadCoordinator's known staging timeout from 15 to 30 seconds\n- companion outcome: capture the contract and rollback note for consumers\n- repository entry point: projects/overture/workers/thumbnail/consumer.ex\n- platform constraint: gRPC\n- known complication: a query plan that changes after statistics refresh\n\nBoth results are required, but they should remain independently reviewable. Preserve cancellation and back-pressure semantics; retain serialization and authorization boundaries; cover cancellation, idempotent retries, and rollback; and avoid drive-by cleanup. Use the code as the source of truth, call out assumptions, and state how an on-call engineer can tell that either part is unsafe to ship.","purpose":"quickFix","secondary":"writing","mixed":true,"difficulty":0.35,"slice":"mixed","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Draft OvertureSlateEditorStore's upgrade note","purpose":"writing","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.33,"slice":"boundary","lang":"en"}
{"prompt":"Zentriere das OvertureFrostPanelStore-Modal","purpose":"frontendImpl","secondary":null,"mixed":false,"difficulty":0.54,"slice":"boundary","lang":"de"}
