201 lines
82 KiB
JSON
201 lines
82 KiB
JSON
{"prompt": "payroll run 2026-07 blew up halfway through and left 400 employees unpaid:\n\norg.springframework.dao.DeadlockLoserDataAccessException: PreparedStatementCallback; SQL [update payslip set net_cents=?, status=? where id=?]; Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction\n\tat org.springframework.jdbc.support.SQLErrorCodeSQLExceptionTranslator.doTranslate(SQLErrorCodeSQLExceptionTranslator.java:263)\n\tat io.paycrest.payroll.PayslipRepository.updateNet(PayslipRepository.java:141)\n\tat io.paycrest.payroll.RunProcessor.processEmployee(RunProcessor.java:212)\n\tat io.paycrest.payroll.RunProcessor.lambda$run$3(RunProcessor.java:88)\n\tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373)\nCaused by: java.sql.SQLTransactionRollbackException: Deadlock found when trying to get lock\n\nrun 88412, 1,204 employees, parallel stream over the employee list, 8 threads", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer falls behind head every few hours and never catches up without a restart:\n\n2026-07-29T11:02:14Z INFO indexer: processing block 21,104,882 (lag 2 blocks)\n2026-07-29T11:04:02Z INFO indexer: processing block 21,104,918 (lag 41 blocks)\n2026-07-29T11:08:11Z WARN indexer: rpc request took 8.4s method=eth_getLogs range=1000\n2026-07-29T11:08:19Z WARN indexer: rpc request took 11.2s method=eth_getLogs range=1000\n2026-07-29T11:12:44Z WARN indexer: reorg detected at 21,104,801, rolling back 12 blocks\n2026-07-29T11:12:58Z INFO indexer: reprocessing from 21,104,789 (lag 214 blocks)\n2026-07-29T11:31:02Z WARN indexer: postgres connection pool exhausted (20/20), waiting\n2026-07-29T11:44:18Z INFO indexer: processing block 21,104,912 (lag 604 blocks)\n\nthe RPC provider says our request rate is well within limits", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our safety concept document has to go to the auditor in november, and writing it will expose where our latency budget doesn't close. produce the document, and give me a separate honest list of the numbers that don't add up so we can decide what to fix first", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the payroll module ignores half our design tokens and its warning colour fails contrast on the row background it's used with. bring it onto the tokens, fix the contrast, and note in the design system docs which token pairs are safe on which surfaces there are fourteen hardcoded colours in there, six of them near-misses of a real token.", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "angular app throws this on the timesheet screen for about one user in fifty:\n\nERROR RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded\n at Object.eval [as updateDirectives] (TimesheetGridComponent.html:41:9)\n at Module.debugUpdateDirectives (core.mjs:44112:12)\n at checkAndUpdateView (core.mjs:41882:5)\n at callViewAction (core.mjs:42214:21)\nERROR Error: NG0100: ExpressionChangedAfterItHasBeenCheckedError: Expression has changed after it was checked. Previous value for 'ngClass': 'row-warning'. Current value: 'row-error'.\n at throwErrorIfNoChangesMode (core.mjs:12044:11)\n\nthe grid has a getter in the template that computes the row state from the entries, and users with more than about 200 entries in a week hit it", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer pool size up to 40", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll thing", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our angular app pulls fontawesome and moment into the initial bundle for three date formats and four icons, which is most of the budget overrun. replace both, keep the rendering identical, and check the print stylesheet still works", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": "refactor", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the payroll run has no alert when it sits in RUNNING for more than an hour, which is how we found out at breakfast", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "robot stops mid-path maybe once a day, and this is what the diagnostics dump:\n\nros2 topic hz /scan\n average rate: 9.412 min: 0.104s max: 0.882s std dev: 0.14112s window: 50\nros2 topic hz /odom\n average rate: 49.881 min: 0.019s max: 0.021s std dev: 0.00041s window: 50\n\n[nav2_controller]: Control loop missed its desired rate of 20.0000Hz... the loop actually took 0.2841 seconds\n[nav2_controller]: Invalid path, Path is empty.\n[behavior_server]: Running backup\n[bt_navigator]: Behavior tree threw exception: Action server timed out\n\nthe lidar is meant to publish at 10Hz and the CPU on the nav box sits at 60%", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payslip PDF still says 2025 tax year", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.15, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "a spanish customer signs in september and we support four countries, none of them spain, which means social security bands, a different absence model and a filing format we've never produced. before anyone opens the calculator i want a plan: what a country pack actually has to contain, how much of spain is data versus code, and whether we can get there without touching the other four countries' behaviour at all", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "we owe a customer a written explanation for why four hundred people were paid late, and their HR director's actual question is why we didn't know until the morning. write the incident report: what happened, what the impact was, why our monitoring missed it, and what changes — without hiding behind the word \"deadlock\"", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "angular component behind our slowest screen. is the getter the whole problem or just part of it?\n\n@Component({\n selector: 'timesheet-grid',\n template: `\n <tr *ngFor=\"let row of rows\" [ngClass]=\"rowState(row)\">\n <td *ngFor=\"let day of row.days\">{{ formatHours(day) }}</td>\n <td>{{ totalFor(row) }}</td>\n </tr>`\n})\nexport class TimesheetGridComponent {\n @Input() entries: Entry[] = []\n get rows() { return this.groupByEmployee(this.entries) }\n rowState(r: Row) { return r.days.some(d => this.hasConflict(d)) ? 'row-error' : 'row-warning' }\n totalFor(r: Row) { return r.days.reduce((a, d) => a + this.minutes(d), 0) / 60 }\n hasConflict(d: Day) { return this.entries.filter(e => e.day === d.date).length > 1 }\n}", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "before this goes anywhere near a payroll run, tell me what's wrong with it:\n\n@Transactional\npublic void run(UUID runId) {\n PayrollRun run = runs.findById(runId).orElseThrow();\n run.getEmployees().parallelStream().forEach(emp -> {\n Payslip slip = calculator.calculate(emp, run.getPeriod());\n payslips.save(slip);\n run.addTotal(slip.getNetCents());\n });\n run.setStatus(COMPLETED);\n runs.save(run);\n events.publish(new PayrollCompleted(runId, run.getTotalCents()));\n}\n\nrun.addTotal mutates a long field on the entity; calculator hits the database for tax bands per employee", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "three services in the ROS graph each do their own transform lookup, with their own error handling:\n\n// pick_place_node.cpp\ntry { tf_buffer_->lookupTransform(\"base_link\", \"tool0\", tf2::TimePointZero); }\ncatch (const tf2::TransformException& e) { RCLCPP_WARN(get_logger(), \"%s\", e.what()); return; }\n\n// perception_node.cpp\nauto tf = tf_buffer_->lookupTransform(\"base_link\", \"camera_link\", msg->header.stamp,\n tf2::durationFromSec(0.1)); // throws on timeout\n\n// safety_node.cpp\nif (!tf_buffer_->canTransform(\"base_link\", \"lidar\", tf2::TimePointZero)) { return last_known_; }\n\none returns stale data on failure, one drops the message, one throws into a callback", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "absence type dropdown is missing bereavement", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.15, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "one date-range validator for all controllers", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "what happens when a tax table is missing?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "is `IsSafe` thread-safe as written?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "robot cell has to pass certification in november and our own numbers don't obviously add up — the perception pipeline alone measures 180ms against a 250ms budget, and the safety check shares a process with the motion controller. work through what the architecture would need to look like to actually satisfy the requirement, and what evidence we'd have to produce alongside it", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.9, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payslip generation, PDF rendering and the bank file writer all live in one class called `PayrollService`", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "a walkthrough of how an absence becomes a deduction line would help before i touch the calculator", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "we need bank file generation to be resumable, because a 40MB export currently regenerates from scratch on every poll", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "arm drifts a few centimetres over a shift and we recalibrate every morning as a workaround:\n\n[ INFO] [1753843201.114]: joint_state_publisher: publishing at 50Hz\n[ WARN] [1753843261.882]: TF_REPEATED_DATA ignoring data with redundant timestamp for frame base_link at time 1753843261.880\n[ WARN] [1753843262.114]: TF_REPEATED_DATA ignoring data with redundant timestamp for frame tool0 at time 1753843262.112\n[ WARN] [1753843321.441]: Lookup would require extrapolation into the past. Requested time 1753843321.401 but the earliest data is at time 1753843321.412\n[ERROR] [1753843382.002]: Trajectory execution aborted: goal tolerance violated on joint_4 (0.0142 > 0.0100)\n[ INFO] [1753843382.114]: controller reset, resuming\n\nsim is perfect, and it only happens on the two cells with the newer controllers", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "webhooks to our customers' HR systems started failing on tuesday, only for two of them:\n\nPOST https://hr.customer-a.example/webhooks/paycrest\n → 200 OK in 412ms\n\nPOST https://api.customer-b.example/paycrest\n → SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert handshake failure\n → retry 1: same\n → retry 2: same\n → giving up after 3 attempts, event queued\n\nPOST https://hooks.customer-c.example/in\n → 421 Misdirected Request\n → retry 1: 421\n → giving up\n\nwe upgraded the base image on monday, from debian bookworm to trixie", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "reorg handling, which i inherited and don't trust:\n\nasync fn handle_block(&mut self, block: Block) -> Result<()> {\n let parent = self.db.get_block(block.number - 1).await?;\n if parent.hash != block.parent_hash {\n let depth = self.find_common_ancestor(&block).await?;\n self.db.delete_blocks_from(depth + 1).await?;\n self.cursor = depth;\n return Ok(());\n }\n let logs = self.rpc.get_logs(block.number, block.number).await?;\n let mut tx = self.db.begin().await?;\n self.db.insert_block(&mut tx, &block).await?;\n for log in logs { self.apply_log(&mut tx, log).await?; }\n tx.commit().await?;\n self.cursor = block.number;\n Ok(())\n}\n\nfind_common_ancestor walks back one block at a time; delete_blocks_from cascades to the balances table", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "this is the safety check on our motion controller and i want another pair of eyes before the certification audit:\n\nbool MotionController::IsSafe(const State& s) const {\n if (estop_pressed_.load()) return false;\n if (s.velocity.norm() > max_velocity_) return false;\n if (last_heartbeat_age() > std::chrono::milliseconds(250)) return false;\n for (const auto& obstacle : obstacles_) {\n if ((s.position - obstacle.position).norm() < safety_radius_) return false;\n }\n return true;\n}\n\nobstacles_ is refreshed by the perception callback on another thread; last_heartbeat_age reads a member updated in the same callback; there is no mutex anywhere in this class", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "RFC for our new payout scheduling. does the reasoning survive contact with reality?\n\n## Proposal\nMove payroll runs from a single nightly batch to a queue of per-employee jobs. Each job is independently retryable, and a run completes when every job reports success.\n\n## Rationale\nA single failing employee currently fails the whole run, and we cannot restart from the middle.\n\n## Consequences\n- Partial runs become visible to customers, who will ask what \"partially paid\" means.\n- Totals can no longer be computed in the same transaction as the slips.\n- Retry storms are possible if the tax service is down.\n\n## Open\nWhether a run can be approved before all jobs complete.", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "safety documentation for the cell, which the auditor will read line by line. what we have:\n\n- e-stop cuts power to the servo drives directly, software is not in the loop\n- the software safety check runs at 100Hz and stops motion if the heartbeat is older than 250ms\n- obstacle detection comes from two lidars, fused, with a 200mm safety radius around the tool\n- reduced-speed mode is entered when a human is detected in the cell, at 250mm/s\n- the perception pipeline has a measured worst-case latency of 180ms\n- recovery from a safety stop requires a physical reset, not a software command\n\nwrite the safety concept document; where our numbers don't add up against a 250ms budget, say so rather than smoothing it over", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "changelog for the indexer, from the commits since v0.9:\n\n41c9e0b feat(reorg): handle reorgs deeper than 12 blocks\n88f21c0 fix(logs): decode indexed value parameters on Transfer\nc0aa774 perf(rpc): batch eth_getLogs into 200-block ranges\n2e91b45 fix(db): don't hold a transaction across an RPC call\naa30f19 feat(api): expose /v1/balances/{address} with block-height parameter\n9c1d004 chore: bump alloy to 0.8\n4410bb7 fix(cursor): persist the cursor after commit, not before\nb77e910 feat(metrics): per-contract indexing lag\n\nour users are other teams who run this themselves; two of these change behaviour in ways that need explaining", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "support keeps getting asked this and answering differently each time. from the code, write the definitive page:\n\ncustomer question: \"When exactly does an absence affect pay? We entered sick leave on the 28th for the period that closed on the 25th, and the employee was paid in full, then a correction appeared the following month with no explanation on the payslip.\"\n\nwhat the code does: absences in a closed period are accepted with retro=true; the next run generates a correction line; the correction line's description is the absence type only, with no dates; the payslip PDF renders corrections in a separate block at the bottom; and if the employee leaves before the next run, the correction is silently dropped", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "same date-range validation lives in four controllers with four different error messages:\n\n// AbsenceController\nif (req.getEnd().isBefore(req.getStart())) throw new BadRequest(\"end before start\");\n\n// TimesheetController\nif (!req.getEnd().isAfter(req.getStart())) throw new BadRequest(\"invalid range\");\n\n// ReportController\nif (req.getStart().plusYears(1).isBefore(req.getEnd())) throw new BadRequest(\"range too wide\");\nif (req.getEnd().isBefore(req.getStart())) throw new BadRequest(\"end before start\");\n\n// PayrollController\nAssert.isTrue(req.getStart().compareTo(req.getEnd()) <= 0, \"bad range\");\n\nthe API contract says a range where start equals end is valid, and two of these disagree", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer's event decoding is a match arm per contract and there are now 40 of them:\n\nmatch (log.address, log.topics[0]) {\n (addr, topic) if addr == USDC && topic == TRANSFER => decode_transfer_indexed(log),\n (addr, topic) if addr == DAI && topic == TRANSFER => decode_transfer(log),\n (addr, topic) if addr == WETH && topic == TRANSFER => decode_transfer(log),\n (addr, topic) if addr == USDC && topic == APPROVAL => decode_approval(log),\n // ... 36 more\n _ => Ok(None),\n}\n\nadding a token means editing this match, and half the arms differ only in whether the value parameter is indexed", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "design spec for the timesheet week view, angular, replacing the grid that falls over:\n\nWeek view (desktop, 1280px+)\n- Employee rows, sticky first column with name and role, 7 day columns plus a total column.\n- Cells show hours as a decimal to one place; empty cells show an em dash at 40% opacity.\n- Conflicts (two entries on the same day) render an amber left border on the cell and a tooltip listing both.\n- Cells are editable inline: click focuses an input, enter commits and moves down, escape reverts, tab moves right.\n- Unsaved edits show a small dot in the corner; a failed save turns the cell's border destructive with a retry affordance.\n- The total column recalculates optimistically as you type.\n- Above 500 rows the table virtualises, but the sticky column and the totals must stay correct while scrolling.\n- Keyboard-only operation must be possible for the whole grid, including conflict resolution.", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "run progress bar needs an elapsed timer", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.25, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "why does startup take four minutes?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "whatever the auditor needs", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "timesheet screen is the top support complaint and the obvious fix is virtualising the grid, but i suspect the real problem is that the component recomputes everything in template getters. before committing to a rewrite i want a view on whether this is a restructure of the existing component or a genuine redesign, and what each would cost", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "nobody can tell me whether our motion controller's safety check is actually safe, because the obstacle list and the heartbeat are written by a perception callback on another thread and there isn't a mutex in the class. read it properly and tell me what can go wrong, how likely it is, and whether the certification auditor would accept it", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "employee portal fails most of an accessibility audit and our public sector customers will ask about it at renewal. fix the concrete items — the payslip iframe, the calendar keyboard navigation, form error association — and write the accessibility statement we can publish afterwards the statement has to be specific enough that a procurement reviewer can check it.", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "i want a position on whether the robot's perception and safety should share a computer at all", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "one tf lookup helper for the three nodes", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "three more chains are on the indexer's roadmap and each one is a week of work plus permanent RPC cost, while the existing chain already falls behind after every reorg. i'd rather we agreed what \"supporting a chain\" means for us — backfill, lag SLOs, cost per chain — before saying yes to any of them, and then decided which of the three is actually worth doing first", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "before we build spanish payroll i want the country-pack boundary agreed — what's data, what's code, how tax years are versioned — and then the boundary proven by moving one existing country onto it, ideally the simplest one, so we find out what's wrong with the design before spain lands", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": "refactor", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "is the reporting query's correlated subquery the reason it times out, or is it the left join on payslips", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "what guarantees does the export endpoint make when two of the customer's servers poll it at once", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "absence approval endpoint should reject approvals from someone in the requester's own reporting line", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "les cotisations sociales sont fausses pour trois salariés et je ne vois pas pourquoi :\n\nSalarié 4412 brut 3 200,00 plafond SS 3 864,00 tranche A 3 200,00 tranche B 0,00 ✓\nSalarié 4418 brut 4 100,00 plafond SS 3 864,00 tranche A 3 864,00 tranche B 236,00 ✓\nSalarié 4421 brut 4 100,00 plafond SS 3 864,00 tranche A 4 100,00 tranche B 0,00 ✗\nSalarié 4429 brut 5 000,00 plafond SS 3 864,00 tranche A 3 864,00 tranche B 1 136,00 ✓\nSalarié 4433 brut 4 100,00 plafond SS 3 864,00 tranche A 4 100,00 tranche B 0,00 ✗\n\nles trois salariés en erreur ont tous eu un avenant au contrat en cours de mois, et le plafond devrait être proratisé", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "fr"}
|
|
{"prompt": "balances in the indexer disagree with the chain for exactly four addresses:\n\naddress indexed on-chain diff\n0x8f21c0aa774119a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4 1,204.118401 1,204.118401 0\n0x41ba190c0aa7741192b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3 882.441000 882.437600 0.0034\n0x2e91b45aa30f199c1d0044410bb7b77e91030cc2 0.000000 12.400000 12.4\n0xc0aa7741ba190882e91b452e91b45aa30f199c1d 4,118.220000 4,118.220000 0\n0xaa30f199c1d0044410bb7b77e91030cc219e1f0a 41.000000 40.999999 0.000001\n\nreconciliation job output:\n checked 41,882 addresses across 12 tokens\n mismatches: 4 (all on token 0x9c1d0044410bb7b77e91030cc219e1f0a8f21c0a)\n first divergence at block 21,041,882\n last full agreement at block 21,041,881\n\nthe token's ABI:\n event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 indexed value)\n\nevery other token we index declares value as a non-indexed parameter, and all four addresses received from this contract", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll engine migration has two months of parallel running left and has to finish before year end, but the diff process is a gist, the sign-off is an email, and nobody has defined what a clean month looks like. i'd like the remaining migration planned properly, including the cutover criteria, what we do if month four fails, and how we prove to an auditor afterwards that the numbers matched", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer decodes events through a forty-arm match on address and topic, where most arms differ only in whether the value parameter is indexed, and adding a token means editing it. replace it with a registry that's data rather than code, keeping the decoding behaviour byte-identical for every contract we currently index", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our javadoc claims the run is atomic, which stopped being true when we parallelised it", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the payroll run has no alert while it sits in RUNNING, which is why a failure at two in the morning was found at six by a human. add the alerting, and tell me what else in that pipeline has the same shape — a state that can be entered and never left without anyone noticing", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "angular build warnings that have been ignored for a year and now break the budget:\n\nWarning: bundle initial exceeded maximum budget. Budget 1.00 MB was not met by 412.11 kB with a total of 1.40 MB.\nWarning: src/app/timesheet/timesheet-grid.component.ts depends on 'moment'. CommonJS or AMD dependencies can cause optimization bailouts.\nWarning: src/app/shared/icons.ts depends on '@fortawesome/fontawesome-free'. CommonJS or AMD dependencies can cause optimization bailouts.\nWarning: src/app/payroll/payroll.module.ts is part of the declarations of 2 modules\n\nError: Budget exceeded, build failed\n\nmoment is used in three files for date formatting only", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer needs a story for backfilling a single contract after a decoding bug, without reindexing everything or touching other contracts' data. think it through with me — cursor per contract, ranges, how balances get recomputed — then implement the range-reprocessing command ranges have to be resumable, because one contract's history is months of blocks.", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll calculator is one class with a branch per country, two hundred lines each, and the proposal on the table is a rules engine with country packs loaded at runtime. i can see why, and i can also see auditors asking which rules produced a payslip three years ago. weigh the options honestly, including the boring one where it stays code but gets restructured", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our health endpoint reports the indexer healthy while it's six hundred blocks behind head", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the `dual_write` flag governs the whole payroll migration and nobody can say precisely what it switches any more. work out what it actually does from the code, then write the page describing it, including what happens if someone turns it off halfway through a run", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "robot cell repo has a two-line readme and a twenty-minute manual calibration procedure documented in a scanned pdf. write the readme a new engineer could actually follow to a moving robot, including the vendored driver patch, the realtime kernel requirement, and the launch-order problem that bites everyone on hardware assume the reader has used ROS before but has never seen this cell.", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payslip viewer should let people download the PDF without opening the iframe at all", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "a short note for the team on why balances are becoming a sum over deltas", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "we need to decide whether the timesheet week view keeps its own state or moves to the store the rest of the app uses", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "angular modules call the API three different ways depending on which year they were written, three components forget to unsubscribe, and only one handles the error case. bring all fourteen onto the newest pattern, keep every screen behaving as it does now, and make the error handling consistent rather than absent fourteen components in total, and the newest pattern is the one we want to end up on.", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "spring boot app takes 4 minutes to start in prod and 20 seconds locally:\n\n2026-07-29T11:02:14.881Z INFO 1 --- [main] o.s.b.w.embedded.tomcat.TomcatWebServer : Tomcat initialized with port(s): 8080 (http)\n2026-07-29T11:02:18.114Z INFO 1 --- [main] o.h.jpa.internal.util.LogHelper : HHH000204: Processing PersistenceUnitInfo [name: default]\n2026-07-29T11:04:41.882Z INFO 1 --- [main] o.h.e.j.e.i.LobCreatorBuilderImpl : HHH000424: Disabling contextual LOB creation as createClob() method threw error\n2026-07-29T11:05:52.114Z INFO 1 --- [main] o.s.o.j.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean : Initialized JPA EntityManagerFactory for persistence unit 'default'\n2026-07-29T11:06:02.441Z INFO 1 --- [main] i.p.config.TaxTableLoader : loaded 41,882 tax bands\n2026-07-29T11:06:14.002Z INFO 1 --- [main] i.paycrest.Application : Started Application in 241.118 seconds\n\nthe gap between 11:02:18 and 11:04:41 is where it sits doing nothing visible", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "gazebo sim passes, real robot fails the same test, and the only difference i can find is timing:\n\n[component_container]: Failed to load component: Package 'gripper_driver' not found\n[component_container]: Component loaded: force_sensor_node\n[force_sensor_node]: Publishing /wrench at 500Hz\n[gripper_action_server]: Waiting for /wrench...\n[gripper_action_server]: Waiting for /wrench...\n[gripper_action_server]: Timed out waiting for /wrench after 5.0s\n[pick_place_node]: Aborting: gripper action server unavailable\n[pick_place_node]: Retrying (1/3)\n[gripper_action_server]: Received first /wrench message\n\nthe force sensor node comes up about 6 seconds after the gripper server on hardware, instantly in sim", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "der Kollege hat das für die Lohnabrechnung geschrieben, bitte einmal drüberschauen:\n\npublic BigDecimal berechneSteuer(BigDecimal brutto, Steuerklasse klasse, int jahr) {\n var tabelle = tabellen.get(jahr);\n if (tabelle == null) {\n tabelle = tabellen.get(jahr - 1); // Fallback auf das Vorjahr\n }\n var band = tabelle.stream()\n .filter(b -> brutto.compareTo(b.von()) >= 0 && brutto.compareTo(b.bis()) <= 0)\n .findFirst()\n .orElse(tabelle.get(tabelle.size() - 1));\n return brutto.multiply(band.satz()).setScale(2, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);\n}\n\ndie Tabellen für 2026 sind noch nicht eingepflegt, und die Klasse wird nirgends verwendet", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "sql the reporting screen runs, which times out for our biggest customer:\n\nSELECT e.id, e.full_name, d.name AS department,\n SUM(p.gross_cents) AS ytd_gross,\n SUM(p.tax_cents) AS ytd_tax,\n (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM absences a WHERE a.employee_id = e.id AND a.starts_at >= $2) AS absence_count,\n (SELECT MAX(pr.paid_at) FROM payslips pr WHERE pr.employee_id = e.id) AS last_paid\nFROM employees e\nJOIN departments d ON d.id = e.department_id\nLEFT JOIN payslips p ON p.employee_id = e.id AND p.period >= $2\nWHERE e.org_id = $1 AND e.terminated_at IS NULL\nGROUP BY e.id, e.full_name, d.name\nORDER BY e.full_name;\n\n41,000 employees, payslips has 4.1M rows, and there's an index on payslips(employee_id, period)", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "ROS launch file, which nobody wants to touch. what does it actually guarantee about startup order?\n\ndef generate_launch_description():\n return LaunchDescription([\n Node(package='lidar_driver', executable='lidar_node', output='screen'),\n Node(package='force_sensor', executable='force_node', output='screen'),\n Node(package='gripper_driver', executable='gripper_action_server', output='screen'),\n TimerAction(period=5.0, actions=[\n Node(package='nav2_bringup', executable='navigation_launch', output='screen'),\n ]),\n Node(package='pick_place', executable='pick_place_node', output='screen',\n parameters=[{'wrench_timeout': 5.0}]),\n ])\n\non hardware the force sensor takes about six seconds to enumerate over USB", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll's parallel-run notes from the migration, they need to become a proper runbook:\n\n- we run the old and new engines on the same period and diff the payslips\n- differences under 2 cents are ignored, anything above goes in a spreadsheet\n- the diff script lives in a gist, takes a run id, and needs read access to both databases\n- known acceptable differences: rounding on pension contributions, and the order of deduction lines\n- if more than 5 employees differ we don't cut over that month\n- the finance lead signs off by replying to an email, which is our only record\n- we've done this for three months and have two months to go", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "public API for absences, documented by nobody. this is what the controller does:\n\n@PostMapping(\"/v2/absences\")\npublic AbsenceDto create(@RequestBody @Valid AbsenceRequest req, @AuthenticationPrincipal Principal p) {\n // employee must belong to the caller's org, else 404 (deliberately not 403)\n // overlapping absences of the same type are rejected with 409\n // overlapping absences of different types are allowed and both count\n // half days are expressed as 0.5 in `days`, quarter days are not supported\n // absences in a closed payroll period are accepted but flagged `retro: true`\n // a retro absence triggers a correction on the next run, never a rerun\n // the `approver_id` is ignored on create and set by the approval endpoint\n}\n\nwrite the reference page, and be explicit about the 404-instead-of-403 because integrators keep filing bugs about it", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "incident notes from the failed payroll run, and 400 people were paid late. we owe the customer a write-up:\n\n02:14 run 88412 starts, 1,204 employees\n02:31 run fails with a database deadlock, status stuck at RUNNING\n02:33 automatic retry starts, fails identically\n06:02 on-call notices during the morning check, not from an alert\n06:40 we establish 804 payslips were written and 400 were not\n07:15 decision: complete the run manually rather than restart it\n09:52 remaining 400 payslips generated, bank file submitted\n11:30 bank confirms the second file, employees paid same day but late\n14:00 root cause: parallel processing of employees updating a shared run total row\n\nthe customer's HR director wants to know why we didn't know until the morning", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "escribe la guía de despliegue a partir de estas notas, que hoy están en la cabeza de una persona:\n\n- el indexador se despliega con helm, pero antes hay que parar el reorg handler manualmente\n- si no se para, la migración de la tabla `blocks` se bloquea y hay que matar la conexión a mano\n- las migraciones se aplican con `sqlx migrate run` desde un pod temporal, no en el arranque\n- después del despliegue hay que verificar que el cursor avanza; si no avanza en dos minutos, rollback\n- el rollback es volver al chart anterior y reiniciar desde el último checkpoint, se pierden unos 10 minutos de datos\n- nunca desplegar durante una reorganización en curso, se corrompen los saldos\n- hay un feature flag `dual_write` que debe estar activo durante toda la migración", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "es"}
|
|
{"prompt": "README for the robot cell repo, currently two lines. what a new person needs:\n\n- ROS 2 Jazzy, ubuntu 24.04, colcon workspace, three packages plus a vendored driver\n- the vendored gripper driver has a patch on top of upstream that must be reapplied after any update, patch is in patches/\n- simulation: `ros2 launch cell_bringup sim.launch.py`, works on any machine\n- hardware: needs the realtime kernel, the user in the dialout group, and the safety PLC in maintenance mode\n- the calibration procedure is a 20 minute manual process documented in a pdf someone scanned\n- tests: unit tests run anywhere, integration tests need either sim or hardware and are not in CI\n- known issue: the force sensor enumerates slowly on hardware, which breaks the launch order\n\nwrite the readme so someone can get to a moving robot without a tap on the shoulder", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "o texto do email que vai para 1.400 empregados está mau, reescreve-o:\n\n\"Caro colaborador, Informamos que devido a uma incidência técnica no processamento do vencimento referente ao mês de Julho, o pagamento poderá ter sido efetuado com atraso relativamente à data habitual. A situação encontra-se resolvida. Agradecemos a compreensão. Departamento de Recursos Humanos.\"\n\nfactos: o pagamento chegou no mesmo dia mas várias horas mais tarde; não houve erro nos valores; ninguém precisa de fazer nada; quem tenha tido encargos bancários por causa do atraso deve contactar o RH e será reembolsado", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "pt"}
|
|
{"prompt": "checkstyle and spotbugs after the merge, and the build gate goes on next week:\n\n[ERROR] PayslipRepository.java:141: Method length is 88 lines (max allowed is 50). [MethodLength]\n[ERROR] RunProcessor.java:88: 'if' construct must use '{}'s. [NeedBraces]\n[WARNING] TaxTableLoader.java:22: Found reliance on default encoding: new FileReader(String) [DM_DEFAULT_ENCODING]\n[WARNING] AbsenceService.java:66: Possible null pointer dereference of approver in AbsenceService.approve() [NP_NULL_ON_SOME_PATH]\n[WARNING] Money.java:41: Class defines equals() but not hashCode() [HE_EQUALS_USE_HASHCODE]\n\n2 errors, 3 warnings", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "clippy on the indexer, some of these look like they matter:\n\nwarning: this `.await` holds a non-Send type across an await point\n --> src/indexer/handler.rs:88:9\nwarning: large enum variant\n --> src/types.rs:41:1\n |\n41 | enum Event { Transfer(TransferEvent), Approval(Box<ApprovalEvent>), Raw([u8; 4096]) }\nwarning: this loop never actually loops\n --> src/rpc/retry.rs:22:5\nwarning: called `unwrap` on a `Result` value in an async fn\n --> src/db/cursor.rs:141:32\n\nwarning: `indexer` (bin \"indexer\") generated 18 warnings", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "connection pool settings across our services, and the indexer is the one that exhausts:\n\n# api\nspring.datasource.hikari.maximum-pool-size: 40\nspring.datasource.hikari.connection-timeout: 30000\n\n# worker\nspring.datasource.hikari.maximum-pool-size: 20\nspring.datasource.hikari.connection-timeout: 30000\n\n# indexer (rust, sqlx)\nmax_connections: 20\nacquire_timeout: 30s\nidle_timeout: 600s\n\n# postgres\nmax_connections = 100\nreserved_connections = 3\n\nthe indexer opens a transaction per block and holds it across the RPC call for logs", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "docker base image bump broke outbound TLS to two customers, here's the difference:\n\n# before (bookworm)\nopenssl version: OpenSSL 3.0.11\nMinProtocol = TLSv1.2\nCipherString = DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=2\n\n# after (trixie)\nopenssl version: OpenSSL 3.5.0\nMinProtocol = TLSv1.2\nCipherString = DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=3\n\ncustomer-b's endpoint:\n TLSv1.2, ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA, RSA 2048, SHA1 signature\ncustomer-c's endpoint:\n TLSv1.2, cipher fine, but the certificate chain is missing an intermediate", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "パラメータの設定が本番とステージングで違っていて、実機だけ止まる原因かもしれません:\n\n# staging (sim) — config/controller.sim.yaml\ncontroller:\n loop_rate: 20.0\n goal_tolerance: 0.02\n lidar_rate_expected: 10.0\n wrench_timeout: 5.0\n tf_buffer_duration: 10.0\n use_sim_time: true\n max_velocity: 0.5\n\n# production (hardware) — config/controller.hw.yaml\ncontroller:\n loop_rate: 20.0\n goal_tolerance: 0.01\n lidar_rate_expected: 10.0\n wrench_timeout: 5.0\n tf_buffer_duration: 1.0\n use_sim_time: false\n max_velocity: 0.5\n\n# 実機のログ（抜粋、1 時間に 40 回ほど）\n[ WARN] Lookup would require extrapolation into the past. Requested time 1753843321.401 but the earliest data is at time 1753843321.412\n[ERROR] Trajectory execution aborted: goal tolerance violated on joint_4 (0.0142 > 0.0100)\n[ INFO] controller reset, resuming\n\ntf_buffer_duration は去年、メモリ使用量を下げるために変更したものです。goal_tolerance を誰が変えたのかは記録が残っていません", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "ja"}
|
|
{"prompt": "github action for the rust indexer, cache never hits:\n\n- uses: actions/checkout@v4\n- uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable\n- uses: actions/cache@v4\n with:\n path: |\n ~/.cargo/registry\n target\n key: ${{ runner.os }}-cargo-${{ github.sha }}\n- run: cargo build --release\n- run: cargo test --all-features\n- run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings\n\nevery run: \"Cache not found for input keys: Linux-cargo-<sha>\"\nbuild time: 14 minutes", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.25, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "this calculator has grown a parameter every time a country was added. same numbers out, better shape:\n\npublic Payslip calculate(Employee e, Period p, boolean includeBonus, boolean prorate,\n Country country, TaxYear year, boolean applyPensionCap,\n BigDecimal overrideRate, boolean skipSocial, List<Deduction> extra) {\n if (country == Country.FR && prorate) { /* 40 lines */ }\n else if (country == Country.DE) { /* 60 lines, ignores prorate */ }\n else if (country == Country.PT) { /* 30 lines, uses overrideRate if set */ }\n else { /* the original UK path, 80 lines */ }\n}\n\nfour call sites pass different combinations, and two of them pass nulls for parameters the branch ignores", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "unser Angular-Code hat drei Wege, dieselbe API zu rufen. Bitte vereinheitlichen, ohne Verhalten zu ändern:\n\n// altes Modul\nthis.http.get<Absence[]>('/api/v2/absences').subscribe(a => this.absences = a)\n\n// neueres Modul\nthis.absenceService.list().pipe(takeUntilDestroyed()).subscribe(a => this.absences.set(a))\n\n// neuestes Modul\nabsences = toSignal(inject(AbsenceService).list(), { initialValue: [] })\n\nvierzehn Komponenten insgesamt, drei davon vergessen das Abmelden, und der Fehlerfall wird nur in einem behandelt", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "test fixtures for payroll are four builders that disagree about defaults:\n\nEmployee e1 = TestEmployees.uk(); // salaried, tax code 1257L, no pension\nEmployee e2 = new EmployeeBuilder().build(); // salaried, no tax code at all\nEmployee e3 = Fixtures.employee(FR); // hourly, with a pension scheme\nEmployee e4 = anEmployee().withSalary(50000).build(); // salaried, UK, pension at 5%\n\nabout 900 tests, and a test that passes with one builder often fails with another because of the pension default", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "planning input for the half, and i need a sequence rather than a wish list:\n\n- payroll engine migration has two months of parallel running left, and it has to finish before year end\n- a customer in Spain signs in september and we don't support Spanish social security at all\n- the timesheet screen is the top support complaint and is unusable above 200 entries\n- the indexer team wants to add three chains, each of which is a week of work plus ongoing RPC cost\n- our robot cell customer needs the certification audit passed by november or the deployment slips a year\n- two engineers are shared between payroll and the indexer and are context-switching badly\n- there's a compliance deadline in january for real-time payroll reporting in one country", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.9, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "architecture ticket that needs thinking, not code:\n\nPAY-620 — Multi-country payroll calculation\nThe calculator is one class with a country branch and 200 lines per country. Adding Spain means a fifth branch. Proposal is a rules engine with country packs loaded at runtime, so a country can be added without a deploy. Concerns raised: payroll rules change annually and must be versioned by tax year; auditors need to see exactly which rules produced a given payslip, years later; a rules engine makes the calculation harder to unit test than a plain class; and two of our countries have rules that genuinely need arbitrary code, not data.", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.9, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer's roadmap request from the teams that depend on it:\n\n- three more chains, with the same API surface\n- historical backfill on demand rather than the current \"reindex everything\" script\n- per-contract lag metrics so a team can alert on their own contract falling behind\n- a way to reprocess a range after a decoding bug, without touching other contracts' data\n- read replicas, because the reporting queries are now competing with indexing writes\n- some story for reorgs deeper than our current 12-block assumption\n\none engineer, one quarter. what would you do and in what order", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "customer requirement for the robot cell, and the certification audit is in november:\n\n\"The safety function shall bring the manipulator to a controlled stop within 250 ms of a human entering the collaborative workspace. Detection shall be redundant, with no single sensor failure defeating the function. The safety function shall be independent of the application software and shall be verifiable without disassembly. Evidence shall include a documented worst-case latency analysis covering sensing, processing, communication and actuation.\"\n\nour perception pipeline alone measures 180ms worst case, the safety check runs in the same process as the motion controller, and we have two lidars but they feed one fusion node", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.9, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "spec for the payroll run screen, which is what customers stare at on the 25th:\n\nRun detail\n- Header: period, status (Draft / Calculating / Ready / Approved / Paid / Failed), employee count, total net. Status drives a coloured left border on the whole card.\n- Progress: during Calculating, a determinate bar with \"812 of 1,204 payslips\", updating over websocket, plus an elapsed timer.\n- Employee table: name, gross, deductions, net, a warning glyph where the payslip differs from last period by more than 20%.\n- Filters: only warnings, only changes, by department. Filters persist for the session.\n- Approve is a primary button, disabled unless status is Ready, with a confirmation dialog that restates the total and the employee count.\n- Failed state shows which employees failed, why, and a Retry failed button that does not touch the successful ones.\n- Everything must degrade gracefully when the websocket drops — fall back to polling, never show stale progress as live.", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "accessibility audit of the employee portal, which our public sector customers care about:\n\n- The payslip PDF viewer is an iframe with no title and no text alternative; screen reader users get nothing.\n- The absence calendar is a table of divs; dates are not announced and arrow-key navigation does nothing.\n- Form errors appear only as red text under the field, not associated with the input and not announced.\n- The \"submit timesheet\" flow uses colour alone to indicate which days are incomplete.\n- Focus is lost to the top of the page after every modal closes.\n- Session timeout warning appears visually with a countdown that is never announced.\n- Contrast fails on the secondary button in both themes (3.1:1).", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "design tokens versus what the payroll module actually uses:\n\ntokens:\n color.text.default #1B1F23\n color.text.muted #5A6672\n color.status.warning #B26A00\n color.status.danger #B3261E\n space.1..6 4 8 12 16 24 32\n radius.sm/md/lg 4 8 12\n font.size.body 14/20\n font.size.caption 12/16\n\npayroll module: 14 hardcoded hex values, six of which are near-misses of the token colours; paddings of 6, 10 and 18px; two font sizes not in the scale; and a warning colour that fails contrast on the row background it's used with\n\nbring it onto the tokens and fix the contrast failure while you're there", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "integration spec our customer's HR system expects from us:\n\nGET /v2/exports/payroll?period=2026-07&format=sepa-xml\n auth: mutual TLS with a client cert we issue, plus an API key header\n response: 200 with the file, or 202 with a Location header if generation takes longer than 5 seconds\n the 202 path must be pollable and the result cached for 24 hours\n the file must be byte-identical on repeated requests for the same period unless a correction was posted\n a correction invalidates the cache and increments a `revision` in the filename\n they poll every 30 seconds from three of their servers, so concurrent identical requests must not generate the file three times\n file sizes are up to 40MB and they cannot handle chunked encoding", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "schema we agreed for reorg-safe balances, needs implementing in the indexer:\n\nCREATE TABLE balance_deltas (\n id bigserial PRIMARY KEY,\n address bytea NOT NULL,\n token bytea NOT NULL,\n delta numeric(78,0) NOT NULL,\n block_number bigint NOT NULL,\n log_index int NOT NULL,\n UNIQUE (block_number, log_index)\n);\nCREATE INDEX ON balance_deltas (address, token, block_number);\n\nbalances become a sum over deltas up to a block height; a reorg deletes deltas above the fork point; the /v1/balances endpoint must answer at any height without scanning the whole history, and it's currently answering from a mutable balances table that reorgs corrupt", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "pasted-context", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "drop moment from the timesheet module", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.25, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "cargo cache key uses the sha", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "lower the indexer's batch to 200 blocks", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "la fecha del recibo sale en formato americano", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.15, "slice": "core", "lang": "es"}
|
|
{"prompt": "seclevel back to 2 for the outbound client", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "tf buffer duration to 10s on hardware", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "hashCode missing on the Money class", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll calculator takes ten parameters, four of which are ignored on three of the four country paths, and two call sites pass nulls into branches that never read them. restructure it so each country's rules live somewhere coherent, with identical output for every payslip in the last twelve months as the acceptance criterion the last twelve months of payslips are the regression suite, so nothing may move by a cent.", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer holds a database transaction across an RPC call, which is why the pool exhausts whenever the provider is slow", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our on-call has no alerting on payroll runs at all, and the obvious alerts would have caught tuesday's failure four hours earlier", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the tax table loader falls back to the previous year when the current year's bands aren't loaded, silently, and the 2026 bands are not in yet. before we change anything i want to know exactly what that fallback produces on a real payslip and how we'd have noticed if a customer hadn't told us", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "das Bundle-Budget auf 1,5 MB anheben", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "unwrap in db/cursor.rs, make it fallible", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "warning glyph on payslips that jumped 20%", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "sticky name column on the week view", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "empty cells should show an em dash", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.15, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "chain selector in the indexer console", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "休暇カレンダーの矢印キー操作が効きません", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "ja"}
|
|
{"prompt": "secondary button contrast fails in both themes", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.25, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "focus jumps to the top after a modal closes", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "conflict border should be amber, not red", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.15, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "totals row scrolls away", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "`RunProcessor` per-country strategies", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "decode table instead of 40 match arms", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "un seul builder pour les tests de paie", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "core", "lang": "fr"}
|
|
{"prompt": "`gross_cents` naming, everywhere", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "pull the retry policy out of the rpc client", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "inline `minutes()`, one caller", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.2, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "signals everywhere in the absence module", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "javadoc on the payroll calculator, please", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "changelog entry for the reorg fix", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "kurze Notiz zur Parallelabrechnung", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "core", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "document the retro absence behaviour", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "summarise the safety concept for the auditor", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "PR body for the balance deltas change", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.3, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "¿el indexador maneja bien las reorganizaciones?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "core", "lang": "es"}
|
|
{"prompt": "can two runs touch the same payslip?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "walk me through the approval flow", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payslips missing for 400 employees", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "arm drifts over a shift", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "webhooks to two customers fail TLS", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "warum hängt der Indexer nach einer Reorg?", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "endpoint for per-contract indexing lag", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "algo pequeno para hoje", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "pt"}
|
|
{"prompt": "carry on where that left off", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "tidier, please", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "grid, you know", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "next one on the list", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "same but for Spain", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "unblock the robot people", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "faster, ideally", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "another look at that screen", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "finish the migration bit", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "le truc d'hier, la suite", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "fr"}
|
|
{"prompt": "start wherever you like", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "absences API is integrated against by six customers and documented nowhere, which is why we get the same three bugs filed repeatedly — the 404 instead of 403, the retro flag, and half days. write the reference page from the controller's actual behaviour, with the surprising parts called out rather than buried in a table", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "deployment procedure for the indexer lives in one engineer's head and includes at least two steps that will corrupt balances if skipped. write it up as a runbook: the pre-deploy checks, the manual stop, the migration step, how to tell within two minutes whether it worked, and exactly what rollback costs us in lost data", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "support answers \"when does an absence affect pay\" differently every time, and the honest answer involves retro flags, corrections on the next run, and a case where the correction is silently dropped. write the page that settles it, in language an HR administrator understands, and be explicit about the dropped-correction case rather than omitting it", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "reorg handler walks back one block at a time to find a common ancestor and deletes forward with a cascade to balances, and i want to understand what that does during a twelve-block reorg while the indexer is already behind. no changes yet — i want to know what actually happens, including what a reader sees mid-rollback", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "RFC proposing per-employee payroll jobs mentions that partial runs become customer-visible and then moves on, which is the part i'd have thought hardest. read it against how runs work today and tell me whether the consequences section is complete, particularly around approval before all jobs finish i would rather know now than after we have built the queue.", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "four addresses have balances that disagree with the chain, all of them holding a token whose Transfer event indexes the value parameter, unlike every other token we index. work out whether our decoder is silently producing zero for those, and how many other contracts we index have the same shape i also want to know how many other contracts we index emit the same event shape.", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "timesheet grid needs to survive five hundred rows without falling over, which means virtualising it, but the sticky employee column and the optimistic totals have to keep working while scrolling. rebuild it to the spec, keep inline editing and keyboard navigation exactly as designed, and make sure conflicts are still visible when a row is partially scrolled", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payroll run screen shows progress over a websocket and simply freezes when the socket drops, which during a run is indistinguishable from the run being stuck. add a polling fallback, make stale progress visibly stale rather than silently wrong, and keep the approve button's guard conditions exactly as they are it should also survive the tab being backgrounded for ten minutes and brought back.", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "safety architecture needs redesigning for certification and there's a piece we can start regardless: separating the safety check into its own process with its own watchdog. give me the design for the whole thing first, then do that separation so we have something to measure assume the auditor will ask for the latency budget in writing, with measurements.", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.9, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "unsere Zeiterfassung ist auf Wochenbasis gebaut und ein Kunde braucht Schichtmodelle über Mitternacht hinweg. Ich hätte gern zuerst ein Konzept, wie das Datenmodell aussehen müsste, und danach die Migration der bestehenden Einträge", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "de"}
|
|
{"prompt": "real-time payroll reporting becomes a legal requirement in one country in january and we currently report monthly in a batch. map out what compliance means for our architecture, then start on whichever piece has the longest lead time — my guess is the submission client, but tell me if it isn't", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "parallel-run process for the payroll migration exists only as folklore and a gist. write it up properly as a runbook, and while you're in the diff script, make it fail loudly when it can't reach one of the two databases instead of reporting zero differences the finance lead's email sign-off should become something we can actually find later.", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": "quickFix", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "escreve a documentação da API de exportação para o cliente e confirma no código se o ficheiro é mesmo idêntico entre pedidos repetidos, porque é isso que estamos a prometer", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "pt"}
|
|
{"prompt": "three employees got the wrong social security bands and all three had a contract amendment mid-month, which suggests the cap isn't being prorated. confirm that from the code, then fix it and tell me how many past payslips are affected i would also like to know whether mid-month terminations hit the same proration bug.", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "robot stops mid-path about once a day and the lidar's publishing rate is wildly variable in the logs. work out whether that's the sensor, the USB bus or our own callback blocking, and once you know, put the diagnostic in place that would tell us next time without a manual dump", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.85, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "i'd like to understand what our launch file actually guarantees about node startup order on hardware", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "is it expected that the indexer's cursor is persisted before the commit rather than after", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "docs/payroll.md describes the old sequential run and the retry semantics we removed", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "api changelog needs an entry for the balances endpoint's block-height parameter", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "write the customer-facing note about the late payment, apologetic but factual, one paragraph", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "necesitamos documentar qué hace el flag `dual_write` durante la migración, nadie se acuerda", "purpose": "writing", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "es"}
|
|
{"prompt": "dates differ between the UI and PDF", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.25, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "goal tolerance on hardware is half what it is in sim, and nobody knows who changed it or why", "purpose": "quickFix", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.35, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "per-contract cursors in the indexer, so one slow contract doesn't hold up everything else", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "how should we version country payroll rules so an auditor can reproduce a payslip from three years ago", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "what's the right way to test payroll calculations, given that a wrong answer is a legal problem rather than a bug", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.75, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "two engineers are split across payroll and the indexer and neither project is moving, what would you do about the allocation", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "what should the story be for customers who want their payroll data in their own warehouse, three have asked now", "purpose": "planning", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.7, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "run detail screen needs the failed-employee list with a retry that skips the successful ones", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "absence calendar should show public holidays for the employee's country, greyed and non-selectable", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.45, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "indexer console needs a reorg history view, so we can see when balances were rolled back", "purpose": "frontendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "reporting screen times out on our biggest customer and the obvious fix is pagination, which finance will hate", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "whatever is on fire", "purpose": "debugging", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "other half of that", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "vague-eval", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "deduction-line ordering differs between the old and new payroll engines, which the migration diff flags every month and we've been waving through as cosmetic. work out whether the order is actually meaningful for the payslip PDF and the bank file, make the new engine match wherever it is, and then write down what \"acceptable difference\" means so the next person isn't guessing", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "topic names are hardcoded as string literals in forty places across the ROS packages, with two typos that only bite in one launch configuration. centralise them properly, and while you're there tell me whether the two typo'd topics were ever connected to anything or have been silently dead since the port to Jazzy", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "`PayrollService` does payslip generation, PDF rendering and bank file writing in one class of about nine hundred lines, and the bank file part is the bit under audit. split it along those three responsibilities, then document which class owns what so the auditor's questions have an obvious answer", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "our angular error handling is three parsers deep because each spring service invented its own error shape. unify the server side onto one shape, and confirm from the client code which of the three parsers is still reachable before you delete anything", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": "review", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "employee test fixtures exist in four flavours with different pension defaults, which is why moving a test between packages changes its outcome. consolidate onto one builder, then write the short note on fixture conventions that should have existed before the fourth one appeared about nine hundred tests depend on these, so the migration has to be mechanical.", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "i want to know whether a parallel stream over employees can corrupt the run total — the entity has a mutable long that every thread adds to — and if it can, the fix, with a test that reproduces it reliably rather than one that passes by luck the run total is a mutable long on the entity, which is the part that worries me.", "purpose": "review", "secondary": "backendImpl", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "angular timesheet grid recomputes row state in a template getter on every change detection pass, which i think explains both the stack overflow and the changed-after-checked error. confirm the mechanism from the code, then tell me the smallest change that fixes it without the rewrite we've been putting off", "purpose": "review", "secondary": "planning", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "before i touch the calculator i'd like to understand how an absence becomes a deduction line — which service decides the daily rate, what happens with a half day, and where the retro flag enters — and then have the tax table cache invalidation documented, because i can't find the call at all", "purpose": "review", "secondary": "writing", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "we need per-contract cursors in the indexer so one slow contract doesn't hold up the rest, but that changes what \"indexed up to block N\" means for the API and for our lag alerts. decide the semantics with me first, then implement the cursor split", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": "planning", "mixed": true, "difficulty": 0.8, "slice": "mixed", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "error responses differ per spring service — some return a problem-details object, some a bare string, one an html error page from the container — and the angular client has grown a parser for each. settle on one shape across the services, keep every status code as it is, and make sure the html case can't happen at all", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "payslip generation, PDF rendering and bank file writing share one class and one set of tests, so a change to the PDF layout requires understanding the bank file format. separate them with the same public entry points, and keep the generated output byte-identical for the last three periods as the acceptance test", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.65, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "nobody can tell me how a payslip correction gets matched back to the absence that caused it, which matters because the correction line on the PDF shows only the absence type. trace it through and explain the matching, including what happens when two absences of the same type land in the same closed period", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "leavers keep their portal access until the next payroll run processes their termination, which HR has now raised as a compliance problem rather than an inconvenience. revoke access at the termination date instead, keep payslip access for the statutory period, and make sure a termination entered in error can be reversed without a support ticket", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.6, "slice": "core", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "a nightly job should flag employees whose net pay has moved more than twenty percent since the last period, before the run is approved rather than after someone complains. thresholds per organisation, an obvious way to acknowledge a flag, and the flags need to survive a recalculation of the run without being silently cleared", "purpose": "backendImpl", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.55, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "the `Run` entity collides with three other Runs across the java service — the payroll one, an import run, a robot cell test run — and every import block has to disambiguate. rename the payroll one throughout, including the JPA table mapping if that can be done without a migration, and check nothing depends on the class name reflectively", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "who else defines a `Run` type?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "why does row state recompute constantly?", "purpose": "review", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.5, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|
|
{"prompt": "one employee builder for the tests", "purpose": "refactor", "secondary": null, "mixed": false, "difficulty": 0.4, "slice": "boundary", "lang": "en"}
|